Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Socio-Economic and Environmental Policies

  • Guofeng ZhangEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)


In this chapter, a comprehensive optimization simulation model was constructed which has four submodels that are: water pollutant balance model, energy model, GHG model, and socio-economic model. The objective function is the maximization of economic growth. Integrated policies by using advanced sewage and sewage sludge treatment technologies are dynamically simulated in this model. Based on this simulation results, optimal integrated policies, sewage, and sewage sludge treatment technologies can be selected. The environmental and economic impact of sewage sludge treatment can be forecasted.


Model Simulation Integrated policies Advanced technologies 


  1. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics (2011) Beijing Input-Output Extension Table 2010. BMBS, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. Beijing Municipal Development and Reform Commission (2011) The Twelfth Five-Year Plan for the National Economic and Social Development of Beijing [EB/OL]:, 21 Jan 2011
  3. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics (2012) Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2011. BMBS, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  4. Chae SR, Shin HS (2007) Effect of condensate of food waste (CFW) on nutrient removal and behaviours of intercellular materials in a vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR). Bioresour Technol 98(2):373–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Higano Y, Sawada T (1997) The dynamic policy to improve the water quality of Lake Kasumigaura. Stud Reg Sci 26(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Higano Y, Yoneta A (1999) Economic policies to relieve contamination of Lake Kasumigaura. Stud Reg Sci 29(3):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirose F, Higano Y (2000) A simulation analysis to reduce pollutants from the catchment area of Lake Kasumigaura. Stud Reg Sci 30(1):47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jing DB et al (2009) COD, TN and TP removal of Typha wetland vegetation of different structures. Pol J Environ Stud 18(2):183–190Google Scholar
  9. Kyou HL, Jong H, Tae JP (1998) Simultaneous organic and nutrient removal from municipal wastewater by BSACNR process. Korean J Chem Eng 15(1):9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li H, Jin YY, Li YY (2011) Carbon emission and low-carbon strategies of sewage sludge treatment. J Civ Archit Environ Eng 33(2):117–121Google Scholar
  11. Mizunoya T, Sakurai K, Kobayashi S, Piao SH, Higano Y (2007) A simulation analysis of synthetic environment policy: effective utilization of biomass resources and reduction of environmental burdens in Kasumigaura basin. Stud Reg Sci 36(2):355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang YH, Inamori R, Kong HN, Xu KQ, Inamori Y, Kondoc T, Zhang JX (2008) Influence of plant species and wastewater strength on constructed wetland methane emissions and associated microbial populations. Ecol Eng 32:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yan JJ, Xao RG, Sha JH (2010) Comprehensive evaluation of integrated pollutant-minimization policies in rural areas of China. China Popul Resour Environ 20(3):124–127Google Scholar
  14. Zhang GF, Xu F, Wang TY et al (2016) Comprehensive evaluation of the regional environmental and economic impacts of adopting advanced technologies for the treatment of sewage sludge in Beijing. In: Thill J-C (ed) Spatial analysis and location modeling in urban and regional systems in advances in spatial science. Springer, New York. Accepted 29 Oct 2013Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic and TradeShijiazhuang University of EconomicsShijiazhuangChina

Personalised recommendations