Advertisement

Introduction

  • Guofeng ZhangEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)

Abstract

Water shortages and water pollution in China is a serious situation that still has not been fundamentally reversed. In order to improve water quality, many sewage plants has been constructed. However, sewage sludgy as the by-product of sewage treatment is ignored by Chinese government. The purpose of our research is to evaluate the environmental and economic impacts with a dynamic comprehensive optimization simulation model, and suggest an optimal policy can achieve the goal of environmentally sustainable economic development. Beijing is selected to make empirical research. The background, objectives, statement of the problem, and literature reviews are shown in this chapter.

Keywords

Sewage sludge Water pollution Water quality 

References

  1. Ayres RU, Kneese AV (1969) Production, consumption and externalities. Am Econ Rev 59(3):282–297Google Scholar
  2. Bao XB (2008) The impact assessment of soil and water conservation investment. J Econ Water Resour 26(4):23–26Google Scholar
  3. Beijing Environmental Protection Bureau (2011) Beijing Environment Bulletin 2010 [EB/OL]. http://www.bjepb.gov.cn/portal0/tab181/, 3 Jun 2011 (in Chinese)
  4. Beijing Municipal Development and Reform Commission (2011) The Twelfth Five-Year Plan for the National Economic and Social Development of Beijing [EB/OL]. http://www.bjpc.gov.cn/fzgh_1/guihua/12_5/Picture_12_F_Y_P/, 21 Jan 2011
  5. Beijing Water Authority (2011) Beijing Water Resources Bulletin 2010 [EB/OL]. http://www.bjwater.gov.cn/tabid/207/Default.aspx, 8 Mar 2011 (in Chinese)
  6. Chen QC, Zhang RS (2007) Study on approaches and index system for quantitatively analyzing comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation. J China Inst Water Resour Hydropower Res 5(2):95–104Google Scholar
  7. Chriemchaisri C, Yamamoto Y, Vigneswaran S (1993) Household membrane bioreactor in domestic wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 27:171–178Google Scholar
  8. Chung W, Tohno S, Shim S (2009) An estimation of energy and GHG emission intensity caused by energy consumption in Korea: an energy IO approach. Appl Energy 86(10):1902–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churchouse S (1997) Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment-operating experiences with the Kubota submerged membrane activated sludge process. Membr Technol 1997(83):5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Côté P, Masini M, Mourato D (2004) Comparison of membrane options for water reuse and reclamation. Desalination 167(15):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cui FJ, Yang YS (2010) The assessment on the influence of industry structure on urban ecological environment. China Environmental Science 10(1):37–42 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. Enrica U, Ivet F, Jordi M, Joan G (2011) Technical, economic and environmental assessment of sludge treatment wetlands. Water Res 45:73–582Google Scholar
  13. Fletcher H, Mackley T, Judd S (2007) The cost of a package plant membrane bioreactor. Water Res 41(12):2627–2635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forsund FR (1985) input–output models: national economic models and the environment. In: Kneese AV, Sweeney JL (eds) Handbook of national resource and energy economics, vol 1 p 6Google Scholar
  15. Gander M, Jefferson B, Judd S (2000) Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep Purif Technol 18:119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gander M, Jefferson B, Judd S (2002) Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations. Sep Purif Technol 18:119-130Google Scholar
  17. Gao ZG, Zhao XW (2011) An empirical research on the relationship between regional industrial structure adjustment and Environment Pollution in Xinjiang Based on the Panel Data Model. Ecol Econ 1:82–95Google Scholar
  18. Gunder B, Krauth K (1998) Replacement of secondary clarification by membrane separation-results with plate and hollow fibre modules. Water Sci Technol 38:383–393Google Scholar
  19. Hannon B (2011) Ecological pricing and economic efficiency. Ecol Econ 36:19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higano Y, Sawada T (1997) The dynamic policy to improve the water quality of lake Kasumigaura. Stud Reg Sci 26(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higano Y, Yoneta A (1999) Economic policies to relieve contamination of Lake Kasumigaura. Stud Reg Sci 29(3):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirose F, Higano Y (2000) A simulation analysis to reduce pollutants from the catchment area of lake Kasumigaura. Stud Reg Sci 30(1):47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong JL, Hong JM, Otaki M, Jolleit O (2009) Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan. Waste Manag 29:696–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hristu VD, Karagianni S, Pempetzoglouc M, Sfetsos A (2010) Optimizing product with energy and GHG emission constraints in Greece: an input–output analysis. Energy Policy 38:1566–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu LC, Zhang SC (2008) Analysis on content and methods of environmental impact evaluation of industrial structure adjustment. Environ Prot 406:16–19Google Scholar
  26. Kim Y, Parker W (2008) A technical and economic evaluation of the pyrolysis of sewage sludge for the production of bio-oil. Bioresour Technol 99:1409–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kimura K, Yamato N, Yamamura H, Watanabe Y (2005) Membrane fouling in pilot-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs) treating municipal wastewater. Environ Sci Technol 39:6293–6299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krauth K, Staab KF (1993) Pressurized bioreactor with membrane separation for wastewater treatment. Water Res 27:405–411Google Scholar
  29. Laera G, Cassano D, Lopez A, Pinto A, Pollice A, Ricco G, Mascolo G (2012) Removal of organics and degradation products from industrial wastewater by a membrane bioreactor integrated with ozone or UV/H2O2 treatment. Environ Sci Technol 46:1010–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Le-Clech P, Chen V, Fane TAG (2006) Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J Membr Sci 284(1–2):17–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee KS (1982) A generalized input–output model of an economy with environmental protection. Rev Econ Stat 64(3):466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lenzen M (1998) Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis. Energy Policy 26(6):495–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leontief WW (1977) The future of the world economy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Lesjean B, Gnirssb R, Adamc C (2002) Process configurations adapted to membrane bioreactors for enhanced biological phosphorous and nitrogen removal. Desalination 149:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li B, Higano Y (2007) An environmental socioeconomic framework model for adapting to climate change in China. In: Cooper R, Donaghy K, Hewings G (eds) Globalization and regional economic modeling in advances in spatial science. Springer, New York, pp 327–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li WJ, Yang MC, Shi PJ (2002) Analysis for the relationship between Tangshan industrial structure and its environment impacts. Geogr Res 21(4):511–518Google Scholar
  37. Li Y, Zou SX, Xu F, Yabar H, Higano Y (2012) The impact of introducing recycling taxes on China’s environmental policy: case study on E-waste recycling. J Sustain Dev 5(4):83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liang Z, Das A, Beerman D, Hu Z (2010) Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater. Water Res 44(11):3313–3320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin HJ, Chen JR, Wang FY, Ding LX, Hong HC (2011) Feasibility evaluation of submerged anaerobic membrane bio-reactor for municipal secondary wastewater treatment. Desalination 280:120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lv WZ, Zheng X, Yang M et al (2006) Virus removal performance and mechanism of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 41:299–304Google Scholar
  41. Mao H, Xu DQ, Wang WJ (2010) The evaluation model and application research of sludge disposal method in sewage plant. Environ Sci Manag 35(1):191–184Google Scholar
  42. Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43(6):1489–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ministry of Environmental Protection (2011) China Environmental Protection Bulletin 2010. [EB/OL]: http://jcs.mep.gov.cn/hjzl/zkgb/, 3 Jun 2011 (in Chinese)
  44. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (2011) China Urban Construction Statistics 2010. Yearbook China Planning Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  45. Mizunoya T, Sakurai K, Kobayashi S, Piao SH, Higano Y (2007) A simulation analysis of synthetic environment policy: effective utilization of biomass resources and reduction of environmental burdens in Kasumigaura basin. Stud Reg Sci 36(2):355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moffatt I, Hanley N (2001) Modeling sustainable development: systems dynamic and input–output approaches. Environ Model Softw 16:545–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Murray A, Horvath A, Nelson K (2008) Hybrid life-cycle environmental and cost inventory of sewage sludge treatment and end-use scenarios a case study from China. Environ Sci Technol 42(9):163–3169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nieuwenhuijzen AFV, Evenblij H, Uijterlinde CA, Schulting FL (2008) Review on the state of science on membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 57(7):979–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nywenind JP, Zhou H (2009) Inganfluence of filtration conditions on membrane fouling and scouring aeration effectiveness in submerged membrane bioreactors to treat municipal wastewater. Water Res 43(14):3548–3558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliveira C, Antunes H (2004) A multiple objective model to deal with economy-energy-environment interactions. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):370–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Owen G, Bandi M, Howell JA, Churchouse SJ (1995) Economic assessment of membrane processes for water and waste water treatment. J Membr Sci 102:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peng J, Wang YL, Ye MT, Chang Q (2005) Research on the change of regional industrial structure and its eco-environmental effect: a case study in Lijiang City. Yunnan Province. Acta Geographica Sinica 60(5):798–806 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  53. Perrings C (1987) Economy and environment. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shi J (2009) Cost-effectiveness analysis and evaluation on the municipal wastewater sludge treatment and disposal system (I). Water Wastewater Eng 35(8):32–35 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  55. Tangsubkul N, Beavis P, Moore SJ, Lundie S, Waite TD (2005) Life cycle assessment of water recycling technology. Water Resour Manag 19(5):521–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. The National Development and Reform Commission (2011) National Economic and Social Development Twelfth Five-Year Plan. People’s Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  57. Trouve E, Urbain V, Manem J (1994) Treatment of municipal wastewater by a membrane bioreactor: results of a semi-industrial pilot-scale study. Water Sci Technol 30:151–157Google Scholar
  58. Turner RK (2000) Integrating natural and socio-economic science in coastal management. J Mar Syst 25:447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang L (2008) The environmental impact of industrial structure adjustment analysis in Jiangsu province. Mark Wkly Disquis Ed 7:49–50 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  60. Wang YL (2010) Benefit evaluation of soil erosion control of small watershed in loess hilly and gully regions-taking gaoquan small watershed in Dingxi of Gansu as an example. J Northwest A&F Univ (Social Science Edition) 10(1):37–42Google Scholar
  61. Wang JQ, Chen CG, Li TS (2003) Benefit evaluation of watershed management on Loess Plateau of Shanxi Province. Bull Soil Water Conserv 23(6):61–64 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  62. Wang XY, Yang LF, Liu R (2013) Application of resource/environment efficiency analysis in environmental impact assessment of regional industry development planning. Environ Sci Manag 38(7):10–12 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  63. Wei Y (2006) A scenario analysis of energy requirements and energy intensity for China’s rapidly developing society in the year 2020. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73(4):405–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Xiang N, Xu F, Sha JH, Helmut Y, Higano Y (2012) Comprehensive evaluation of effectively utilizing reclaimed water to accomplish sustainable development in Tianjin. China. Adv Mater Res 524–527:3040–3045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xu F, Yoshiro H (2009) Comprehensive evaluation of water quality improvement policy in reservoir of Yang He in Qin Huang Dao He Bei China. Stud Reg Sci 39(3):751–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yan JJ, Xao RG, Sha JH (2010) Comprehensive evaluation of integrated pollutant-minimization policies in rural areas of China. China Popul Res Environ 20(3):124–127Google Scholar
  67. Yang XP (2010) Status and ideas of the Beijing Municipal sludge disposal. Water Wastewater Inf 8:17–18 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  68. Yao WB, Liu WZ, Zhao AC, Li HY (2009) Evaluation index of the soil and water conservation benefit. Sci Soil Water Conserv 7(1):112–117Google Scholar
  69. Yoona SH, Kimb HS, Yeomb IT (2004) The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment. Water Res 38(1):37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhang J (2008) Evaluation and regulation of ecological environmental impact of the Regional Industrial Structure. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi 20(2):129–133 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  71. Zhang SY, Houten RV, Eikelboom DH, Doddema H, Jiang ZC, Fan YB, Wang JS (2003) Sewage treatment by a low energy membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 90(2):185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zheng X, Lv WZ, Yang M et al (2005) Evaluation of virus removal in MBR using coliphages T4. Chin Sci Bull 50:862–867Google Scholar
  73. Zhao T, Ding P (2008) An empirical analysis of regional industrial structural change impacts on the ecological environment—in Jiangsu Province. Ind Technol Econ 27(12):90–93Google Scholar
  74. Zhou J (2011) The Sludge status and the treatment strategy of Beijing. Water Ind Mark 4:30–32 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic and TradeShijiazhuang University of EconomicsShijiazhuangChina

Personalised recommendations