Skip to main content

The Dead Are Rising: Gender and Technology in the Landscape of Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Generation Z

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education ((CSTE))

  • 3332 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates the gender-technology divide through the Zombie Apocalypse. Zombies ‘provide indexes of how we collectively [grapple] with past (and present) social issues’ (Platts, Social Compass 7(7): 547–560, 2013), indicating that they are a social barometer of both our past and present situation. They may be “read” in a variety of ways, suggesting that the zombie is both metaphor and symbol, and that the zombie apocalypse narrative is largely allegorical. George A Romero’s Living Dead series begins in 1968 with Night of the Living Dead and has had numerous sequels. For the purposes of this chapter, Diary of the Dead (2007) has been selected for exploration. While DOTD did not have a major cinematic release in the US, it has been selected for three very important reasons: it fits into the wider Night of the Living Dead (1968) franchise; it privileges an unorthodox, amateur filming and editing style that has become increasingly employed in the contemporary horror film (Was popularised by the Blair Witch Project (1999) and utilised sporadically until Paranormal Activity (2009) repopularised it with such a profound impact on contemporary horror films); and, finally, it represents American university students engaging with filmmaking education and simultaneously applying this amateur style to their own project before the Zombie Apocalypse pans out.

I guess in my pictures you’re either doomed or you’ve got yourself a hell of a job(George A. Romero)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Romero’s Living Dead Franchise is comprised of these films: Night of the Living Dead (1968), Dawn of the Dead (1978), Day of the Dead (1985), Land of the Dead (2005), Survival of the Dead (2009).

  2. 2.

    Was popularised by the Blair Witch Project (1999) and utilised sporadically until Paranormal Activity (2009) repopularised it with such a profound impact on contemporary horror films.

  3. 3.

    For a more in-depth study of the connections between the Gothic and the Zombie, see Kyle W. Bishop’s (2010) American Zombie Gothic: The Rise and Fall (and Rise) of the Walking Dead in Popular Culture.

  4. 4.

    By contemporary, I am suggesting from Romero’s 1968 Night of the Living Dead on ward, as this has been the most influencing film on both the Zombie and the Zombie narrative (Heffernan 2002: 75; Platts 2013: 550).

  5. 5.

    This notion draws from Ellis’ division of the Gothic narrative into two strands: the masculine and the feminine, where the former being the travelling narrative and the latter being the domestic.

  6. 6.

    I am not suggesting one theory of developmental stages over the other; rather, I am illustrating the application of those stages to the representation of students in Diary of the Dead.

  7. 7.

    This is a highly understudied area of film studies, particularly as universities and university students feature in numbers of major Hollywood productions with a large portion of them falling within the genres of comedy and horror. See, for example, Black Christmas (1974 and 2006), Animal House (1978), The House on Sorority Row (1983), Scream 2 (1997), Dead Man on Campus (1998), The Blair Witch Project (1999), Cry_Wolf (2005), Sorority Row (2009).

  8. 8.

    This is not to ignore the important contribution and continuous enrolment of men in these humanities-based subjects, rather highlights how women have historically been “conditioned” to enter into these liberal arts subjects (Bagilhole and White 2013).

References

  • Auerbach, N. (1982). Woman and the demon: The life of a Victorian myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, N. (1995). Our vampires, ourselves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayalon, H. (2003). Women and men go to university: Mathematical background and gender differences in choice of field in higher education. Sex Roles, 48(5/6), 277–290. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badley, L. (1995). Film, horror, and the body fantastic. London: Greenwood Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B., & White, K. (2011). Gender, power and management: A cross-cultural analysis of higher education. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bagilhole, B., & White, K. (2013). Generation and gender in academia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berenstein, R. J. (1996). Attack of the leading ladies: Gender, sexuality, and spectatorship in classic horror cinema. New York: Columbia UP. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch-Bayley, N. (2012). Terror in horror genres: The global media and the millennial zombie. The Journal of Popular Culture, 45(6), 1137–1151. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, K. W. (2010). American zombie gothic: The rise and fall (and rise) of the walking dead in popular culture. Jefferson: McFarland. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, B. (1999). Refusing to refuse to look: Female viewers of the horror film. In M. Stokes & R. Maltby (Eds.), Identifying Hollywood’s audiences: Cultural identity and the movies. London: BFI. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, B. (2001). Screaming for release: femininity and horror film fandom in Britain. In C. Steve & P. Julian (Eds.), British horror cinema. London: Routledge. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, B. (2009). Horror. London: Routledge. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clery, E. J. (2004). Women’s Gothic: From Clara Reeve to Mary Shelley. London: Northcote House Publishers Ltd. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clover, C. J. (1992). Men women and chainsaws: Gender in the modern horror film. London: BFI. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, B. (2007). The monstrous-feminine: Film, feminism, psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beauvoir, S. (1953). The second sex. New York: Knopf. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dendle, P. (2007). The zombie as barometer of cultural anxiety. In S. Niall (Ed.), Monsters and the monstrous: Myths and metaphors of enduring evil. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, M. (1997). Nightmare on Main Street: Angels, sadomasochism, and the culture of gothic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K. F. (1989). The contested castle: Gothic novels and the subversion of domestic ideology. Urbana: U of Illinois. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: W.W. Norton. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: W.W. Norton. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K., & Gill, R. (1995). The gender-technology relation: Contemporary theory and research. London: Taylor & Francis. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, H. (2007). Hollywood heroines: Women in film noir and the female gothic film. London: I. B. Tauris & Co Ltd. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, K. (2002). Inner-city exhibition and the genre film: Distributing Night of the Living Dead (1968). Cinema Journal, 41(3), 59–77. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, T. (1992). Dead secrets: Wilkie Collins and the female gothic. New Haven: Yale UP. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. A. (1996). Gender inequality and higher education. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 153–185. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jancovich, M. (1992). Horror. London: Batsford. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. G. (2006). Introduction. In F. Mary Frank, D. G. Johnson, & S. V. Rosser (Eds.), Women, gender, and technology (pp. 1–12). Urbana: U of Illinois. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2013). Gender monstrosity. Feminist Media Studies, 13(3), 525–539. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, E. A. (1983). Women and film: Both sides of the camera. New York: Methuen. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, G. (2001). Varieties of female gothic. London: Pickering & Chatto. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platts, T. K. (2013). Locating zombies in the sociology of popular culture. Sociology Compass, 7(7), 547–560. Web.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam, J. (2007). The zombie. In S. T. Joshi (Ed.), Icons of horror and the supernatural: An encyclopedia of our worst nightmares (pp. 723–753). Westport: Greenwood. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, K. A. (2004). Mixed race students in college: The ecology of race, identity, and community on campus. Albany: State U of New York. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twitchell, J. (1987). Dreadful pleasures: An anatomy of modern horror. Oxford: Oxford UP. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park: Pennsylvania State UP. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajcman, J. (2006). TechnoFeminism. Cambridge: Polity. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, D. (2013). Female gothic histories: Gender, history and the gothic. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, P. (2000). The horror genre: From Beelzebub to Blair Witch. London: Wallflower Press. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme, S. (1993). Gothic (re)visions: Writing women as readers. Albany: SUNY UP. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worland, R. (2007). The horror film: An introduction. Malden: Blackwell Publications. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Videography

  • 28 Days Later. Dir: Danny Boyle. 20th Century Fox. 2002. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Animal House. Dir: John Landis. Universal Pictures. 1978. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Christmas. Dir: Bob Clark. Warner Bros. 1974. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black Christmas. Dir: Glen Morgan. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. 2006. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cry_Wolf. Dir: Jeff Wadlow. Universal Pictures. 2005. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawn of the Dead. Dir: George A. Romero. United Film Distribution Company. 1979. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawn of the Dead. Dir: Zack Snyder. Universal Pictures. 2004. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day of the Dead. Dir: George A. Romero. United Film Distribution Company. 1985. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dead Man on Campus. Dir: Alan Cohn. Paramount Pictures. 1998. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diary of the Dead. Dir: George A. Romero. The Weinstein Company. 2007. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • I, Robot. Dir: Alex Proyas. 20th Century Fox. 2004. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land of the Dead. Dir: George A. Romero. Universal Pictures. 2005. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Night of the Living Dead. Dir: George A. Romero. The Walter Reade Organization. 1968. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranormal Activity 2. Dir: Tod Williams. Paramount Pictures. 2010. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranormal Activity 3. Dir: Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman. Paramount Pictures. 2011. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranormal Activity 4. Dir: Henry Joost and Ariel Schulman. Paramount Pictures. 2012. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranormal Activity. Dir: Oren Peli. Paramount Pictures. 2009. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranormal Activity: The Marked Ones. Dir: Christopher B. Landon. Paramount Pictures. 2014. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paranormal Entity. Dir: Shane Van Dyke. The Asylum. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantine. Dir: John Erick Dowdle. Screen Gems. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scream 2. Dir: Wes Craven. Dimension Films. 1997. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinister. Dir: Scott Derrickson. Summit Entertainment. 2012. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorority Row. Dir: Stewart Hendler. Summit Entertainment. 2009. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Survival of the Dead. Dir: George A. Romero. E1 Entertainment; Magnet Releasing. 2009. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Blair Witch Project. Dir: Daniel Myrick and Eduardo Sanchez. Artisan Entertainment. 1999. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • The House on Sorority Row. Dir: Mark Rosman. Multicom Entertainment Group Inc. 1983. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Last Exorcism. Dir: Daniel Stamm. Lionsgate. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Matrix Franchise. Dir: Andy and Lana Wachowski. Warner Bros Pictures. 1999-2003. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Poughkeepsie Tapes. Dir: John Erick Dowdle. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. 2007. DVD.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Walking Dead. Creator: Frank Darabont. AMC. 2010-present. Television.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Patrick Bingham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bingham, W.P. (2016). The Dead Are Rising: Gender and Technology in the Landscape of Crisis. In: Carrington, V., Rowsell, J., Priyadharshini, E., Westrup, R. (eds) Generation Z. Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-934-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-934-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-932-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-934-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics