Abstract
This paper describes a study whose goal was to assess students’ prior knowledge level with respect to a target domain based solely on characteristics of the natural language interaction between students and a state-of-the-art conversational ITS. We report results on data collected from two conversational ITSs: a micro-adaptive-only ITS and a fully adaptive (micro- and macro-adaptive) ITS. Our models rely on both dialogue and session interaction features including time-on-task, student-generated content features (e.g., vocabulary size or domain-specific concept use), and pedagogy-related features (e.g., level of scaffolding measured as number of hints). Linear regression models were explored based on these features in order to predict students’ knowledge level, as measured with a multiple-choice pre-test, and yielded in the best cases an r = 0.949 and adjusted r-square = 0.878.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students’ understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 363–387.
Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471–533.
Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Consortium for Policy Research in Education Report #RR-63. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Forbes-Riley, K., & Litman, D. J. (2006). Modelling user satisfaction and student learning in a spoken dialogue tutoring system with generic, tutoring, and user affect parameters. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference.
Lintean, M., Rus, V., & Azevedo, R. (2011). Automatic detection of student mental models during prior knowledge activation in metatutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21(3), 169–190.
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Romero, C., López, M. I., Luna, J. M., & Ventura, S. (2013). Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Computers and Education, 68, 458–472.
Rus, V., D’Mello, S., Hu, X., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Recent advances in conversational intelligent tutoring systems. AI Magazine, 34(3). Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795–825.
Rus, V., Stefanescu, D., Baggett, W., Niraula, N., Franceschetti, D., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Macro-adaptation in Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Matters, The 12th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, June 5–9, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.
Shute, V. J., & Ventura, M. (2013). Measuring and Supporting Learning in Games: Stealth Assessment. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Taraban, R., & Rynearson, K. (1998). Computer-based comprehension research in a content area. Journal of Developmental Education, 21, 10–18.
VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 3–62.
Williams, C., & D’Mello, S. (2010). Predicting student knowledge level from domain-independent function and content words. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 62–71). Berlin: Springer.
Woolf, B. (2008). Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors, Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-Learning. Elsevier & Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Yoo, J. -B., & Kim, J. (2012). Predicting learner’s project performance with dialogue features in online Q&A discussions. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 570–575).
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Institute for Education Sciences (IESs) under award R305A100875 to Dr. Vasile Rus. All opinions and findings presented here are solely the authors’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rus, V., Stefanescu, D. (2016). Toward Non-intrusive Assessment in Dialogue-Based Intelligent Tutoring Systems. In: Li, Y., et al. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-866-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-868-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)