Skip to main content

Influencing Metacognition in a Traditional Classroom Environment Through Learning Analytics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

Metacognition plays an important role in the learning process as it allows learners to become better aware of their level of understanding and comprehension. Knowledge of learners’ metacognition level allows teachers to provide feedback to learners to enable correction of learning strategies. However, measuring metacognition based upon learner activities outside a computer-based learning environment is a challenging task. This paper explores this challenge in adult learners for the purpose of developing a learning analytics model that can be used to influence the use of metacognitive strategies to improve learning and comprehension. As a solution, a novel learning analytics model is presented. This model is based upon data captured from a traditional physical classroom environment and can be used to build a working learning analytics model designed to provide feedback to the learner. Such feedback can provide insights of learners’ use of metacognitive strategies with a view to improving their comprehension of a given topic and thus to improve their understanding of that topic and ultimately to improve their academic success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brokenshire, D., & Kumar, V. (2014). Discovering causal models of self-regulated learning. Master’s thesis, School of Computing and Information Systems, Athabasca University. Retrieved March 31, 2015 from http://david.brokenshire.ca/artifacts/David%20Brokenshire%20-%20MSc%20Thesis.pdf

  2. Dyckhoff, A. L., Zielke, D., Bültmann, M., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Efklides, A. (2014). How does metacognition contribute to the regulation of learning? An integrative approach. Psychological Topics, 23(1), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers: A generic framework for learning analytics. Educational Technology and Society, 15(3), 42–57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hadwin, A., Nesbit, J., Jamieson-Noel, D., Winne, P., & Kumar, V. (2005). Tracing self-regulated learning in an e-learning environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, C. (2013). Examining intentional knowing among secondary school learners: Through the lens of metacognition. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Larkin, S. (2010). Metacognition in young children (1st ed., pp. 37–39). New York: Routledge. doi:www.imd.inder.cu/…/Metacognition%20in%20Young%20Children.pdf

  8. Mytkowicz, P., Goss, D., Steinberg, B., & College, C. (2014). Assessing metacognition as a learning outcome in a postsecondary strategic learning course. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(1), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sarac, S., & Karakelle, S. (2012). On-line and off-line assessment of metacognition. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(2), 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K., & Bauer, K. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(2), 169–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tin Can API. (2015). What is the tin can API? Retrieved March 31, 2015 from http://tincanapi.com/overview/

  12. Winnie, P., Nesbit, J., Kumar, V., Hadwin, A., Lajoie, S., Azevedo, R., & Perry, N. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with gstudy software: The learning kit project. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3(1), 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wayne J. Brown .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brown, W.J., Kinshuk (2016). Influencing Metacognition in a Traditional Classroom Environment Through Learning Analytics. In: Li, Y., et al. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-866-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-868-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics