Advertisement

Tax Incentives for Museums and Cultural Heritage

  • Sigrid HemelsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Creative Economy book series (CRE)

Abstract

Museums and cultural heritage are a specific sub-sector of creative industries. Usually, legal entities in this sector operate as an NPO or charity. Many countries apply tax incentives for charities, benefitting this sector. The best-known example of such incentives is probably tax incentives for donations. It is often stated that the USA’s incentive is most generous in this regard; however, as this chapter will show, this assumption does not seem to be correct. Other incentives are tax exemptions for charities and tax incentives for volunteers . Important incentives for museums and archives are the ability to pay taxes with art and heritage objects as well as the wealth tax exemption of objects given on loan. A specific sub-sector of the cultural industries, businesses specialized in restoring and maintaining heritage, benefits from tax incentives that several countries provide to private owners of heritage buildings and objects.

Keywords

Museum Cultural heritage Acceptance in lieu of tax Gift deduction Charity Monument Donation Resale right Volunteers 

References

  1. Agency for Cultural Affairs (2014) Policy of cultural affairs in Japan. Fiscal 2014. http://www.bunka.go.jp/english/about_us/policy_of_cultural_affairs/pdf/2014_policy.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2014
  2. Arts Council England (2013) Acceptance in Lieu report 2013. http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/Acceptance_in_Lieu_report_2013.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2015
  3. Arts Council England (2014) Cultural gifts scheme and acceptance in Lieu report 2014. http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/Cultural_Gifts_Scheme_and_Acceptance_in_Lieu_publication_Nov14.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2015
  4. Attorney-General’s Department (2013) Cultural gifts program guide. Tax incentives for cultural gifts to Australia’s public collections. http://arts.gov.au/sites/default/files/collections/cultural-gifts-progam-guide.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2015
  5. Bekkers R, Schuyt T, Gouwenberg B (2015) Geven in Nederland 2015. Reed Business Information, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell FW (2012) How are museums supported financially in the U.S.? United States Department of Stae. Bureau of International Information Programs. http://photos.state.gov/libraries/amgov/133183/english/P_You_Asked_How_Are_Museums_Supported_Financially.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2015
  7. Brody E (1998) Of sovereignty and subsidy: conceptualizing the charity tax exemption. J Corp Law 23: 585–629Google Scholar
  8. Bullain N (2006) About miracles and misperceptions—lessons from the “percentage mechanism” in Hungary. http://www.icnl.org/research/library/files/Hungary/miracles.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015
  9. Commission interministérielle d’agrément pour la conservation du patrimoine artistique national (2008) La Dation en paiement. http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/actualites/communiq/albanel/Plaquedation.pdf. Accessed 28 July 2015
  10. Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2015) Cultural gifts scheme guidance. http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/doc/CGSguidance27january2015.docx. Accessed 28 July 2015
  11. Department of Arts, Heritage and the Gaeltacht (2015) Tax relief for donations of heritage items under Section 176 of finance act, 1995 and Section 1003 taxes consolidation act, 1997. http://www.ahg.gov.ie/app/uploads/2014/08/donations_1995_to_date.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2015
  12. EFC (2015) Comparative highlights of foundation laws: the operating environment for foundations in Europe. EFC BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. Feld AL, O’Hare M, Schuster MDJ (1983) Patrons despite themselves: taxpayers and arts policy. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Gruber J (2011) Public finance and public policy. Worth Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemels SJC, Shiba Y (2015) Tax legislation as instrument to support private patronage of the arts and cultural heritage. Tokoha Law Rev 2(1):45–68Google Scholar
  16. Indiana University, Lilly Family School of Philantropy (2015) Giving USA 2015. Annual report on philanthropy for the year 2014. Giving USA Foundation, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. List JA (2011) The market for charitable giving. J Econ Perspect 25:157–180Google Scholar
  18. Mastellone P (2013) Religion and taxation in Italy: the principle of laïcité and compliance with EU law. Eur Tax 53:378–391Google Scholar
  19. Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication (2015) Dation en paiement. http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/fiscal/dation.htm. Accessed 28 July 2015
  20. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2000) Japanese government policies in education, science, sports and culture 2000. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/hpae200001/hpae200001_2_137.html. Accessed 28 July 2015
  21. Murphy SJ (2012) Irish historical mysteries: the trade in Joyce manuscripts. http://homepage.eircom.net/~seanjmurphy/irhismys/joyce.htm. Accessed 28 July 2015
  22. Nährlich S (2013) Percentage philanthropy. Selbstbestimmte Steuerzuweisungen an Gemeinnützige. Stiftung Sponsoring 4:26–27Google Scholar
  23. O’Hagan J (2011) Tax concessions. In: Towse R (ed) A handbook of cultural economics, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 408–412Google Scholar
  24. Spyker CL, Peloza, J (2009) The potential impact of Canadian federal and/or provincial tax credit incentives for volunteer participation. Volunteer Alberta, Edmonton. http://volunteer.ca/content/potential-impact-canadian-federal-andor-provincial-tax-credit-incentives-volunteer. Accessed 23 July 2015
  25. Peloza J, Steel P (2005) The price elasticities of charitable contributions: a meta-analysis. J Public Policy Mark 24(2):260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perez W (2015) Federal income tax rates for the year 2015. http://taxes.about.com/od/Federal-Income-Taxes/fl/Federal-Income-Tax-Rates-for-the-Year-2015.htm. Accessed 22 July 2015
  27. Petersen J (2015) Kirchensteuer kompakt Strukturierte Darstellung mit Berechnungsbeispielen. Spinger Gabler, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quick E, Kruse TA, Pickering A (2014) Rules to Give By. A global philanthropy legal environment index. Nexus/McDermott Will & Emery/Charities Aid Foundation, Washington. http://www.nexusyouthsummit.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/RULES-TO-GIVE-BY-FINAL-Print.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2015
  29. Rijksmuseum (2009) Grote schenking uit collectie Prof. Dr. I.Q. van Regteren Altena. http://62.212.91.193/collectie/aanwinsten2009/tekeningen-regteren-altena?lang=nl. Accessed 28 July 2015
  30. Rustin S, Arnett G (2015) The sponsorship files: who funds our biggest arts institutions. The Guardian 2 March. http://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/mar/02/arts-corporate-sponsorship-tate-british-museum. Accessed 22 July 2015
  31. Spector M (2008) A portrait of art as a tax deduction. Wall Street J 22 July. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB121667821980971651. Accessed 22 July 2015
  32. Stanco GP (2014) Ruim vijftien jaar kwijtschelding van successierechten met kunst; een evaluatie. Weekblad fiscaal recht 7077:1604–1614Google Scholar
  33. Stanley SS, McDaniel PR (1985) Tax expenditures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts/LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Stratemeyer G (ed) (2010) Tax credit incentives for volunteer participation. http://volunteer.ca/content/tax-credit-incentives-volunteer-participation-white-paper-supporting-policy. Accessed 22 July 2015
  35. Tabart M (2003) La dation Brancusi. Designs et archives. Editions du Centre Pompidou, Paris Vanistendael F (ed) (2015) Taxation of Charities. IBFD AmsterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Tax LawErasmus School of Law, Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Allen & OveryAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations