Skip to main content
  • 670 Accesses

Abstract

Soekarno’s regime was monumental (1945–1966). The characteristics of his government facilitated Indonesia to be an independent country from Dutch colonial rule on August 17, 1945. Soekarno and his regime launched radical policies on economic nationalization in terms of estate plantation, mining, and buildings from the Dutch. In addition, his government encouraged the holding of the Asia Africa Conference. The Conference was held in 1955, in Bandung, to liberate their countries from Western colonial domination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nasakom was an Indonesian term widely used in the Soekarno--> government, which means an ideology based on three pillars (nationalism, religion, and communism). See Soekarno, Dibawah Bendera Revolusi. Jakarta: Jambatan Press, 1961. Kahin, George, Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1952.

  2. 2.

    Supersemar --> is an abbreviated Indonesian term for Surat Perintah Sebelas Maret’. This Supersemar letter had three substantial meanings: (1) Soeharto as head of Kostrad--> (Army Strategic Reserve Command) had duties to recover political and security affairs at the national level; (2) to cooperate and coordinate concerning national security with other army heads of command; (3) to make reports concerning political stability and national security to Soekarno--> as President still believed in the “Nasakom” (Nationalism, Religion and Nationalism) ideology. For further discussion, see Soekarno, Dibawah Bendera Revolusi, Jambatan Press, Jakarta 1961. But, in reality Soeharto took over this authority for his interest on coming to power--> in 1966. For further discussions, see Taufik Abdullah (Head of LIPI: Indonesian Institute of Sciences) interviewed in Metro TV, June 6, 2001. And see SEKNEG (State Secretary) official document in 1966.

  3. 3.

    The Soeharto government has held a general election six times from 1971, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, and 1997, and Golkar as the ruling party was to be winner between 60 % and 70 % of the vote. It was because the government’s policy and facilities were given to Golkar as the ruling party and discriminated against the opposition party, for example, the PPP the Muslim supporters’ base and the PDI, of which nationalist, Christian, and other religions were followers. For a discussion on general elections issues in the Soeharto government, see Liddle, William R, Pemilu-Pemilu Orde Baru (The General Election in the New Order), Jakarta: LP3ES, 1992; and Suyyadinata, Leo, Golkar dan Militer: Studi Tentang Budaya Politik (Golkar and Military --> : A Study of Political Culture), Jakarta: Gramedia Press, 1992; If you would like to compare with the general election in 1955, see Feith, Herbert, The Indonesian Election of 1955, Interim Report Series. Ithaca: Cornell Modern Indonesia Project, 1957.

    And to learn about the political characteristics of the new order, see, Pabottingi , Mochtar, Suara Waktu (The Voice of Time), Surabaya: Erlangga Press, 1999.

  4. 4.

    Professor Sarbini was interviewed on May 18, 2000 in Jakarta. Sarbini was formerly head of the Statistic Bureau. He had graduated from Harvard University in the 1960s and became lecturer and professor in the Faculty of Economics, The Indonesian University. Meanwhile, Ibrahim was the secretary general of the Islamic Students Association (Himpunan Mahasiswa Islam/HMI) in the 1950s and he actively participated in the Indonesian business community in the 1960s. The interview with Ibrahim was conducted on March 13, 2000.

  5. 5.

    For a further information of economic development--> in The New Order, see Hill, Hal, The Indonesian Economy Since 1966, Cambridge University Press, 1996; and for agricultural policy in the early 1970s, see Booth, Anne and Mac Cawley, Peter (Eds.), The Indonesian economy during the Soeharto era, London: Cambridge University Press, 1981. As they noted, in the early 1970s because of economic policy and the foreign exchange earnings from the oil sector totally increased, the Indonesian economy recovered soon and infrastructure development grew from irrigation, transportation, port, airport sector, and so on.

  6. 6.

    Sato, Yuri, ‘The development of business in groups in Indonesia: 1967–1989’ in Approaching Suharto’s Indonesia from the Margins, (edited by Takashi Shiraishi), Southeast Asia Program, Cornell University, New York, 1994, p. 101.

  7. 7.

    Conglomeration (grouping business) supported by government policy and their bureaucrats in Southeast Asia often occurred in the business sector in the 1980s and 1990s. In terms of the Indonesian case, the Soeharto government’s bureaucrats gave special facilities through economic policies and colluded with private business especially in the forestry and industries sector. For a further discussion on the growth of capitalism in Southeast Asia, see Yoshihara, Kunio, The Rise of Ersatz Capitalism in Southeast Asia, 1988; and Robinson, Richard, Indonesia: The Rise of Capital, Australia: Allen & Unwin Ltd, 1986.

References

  • BKPM (Badan Koordinasi Penanamam Modal/The Board of Investment Coordination) (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth A, MacCawley P (eds) (1981) The Indonesian economy during the Soeharto era. Cambridge University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassburner B (1971) The economy of Indonesia: selected readings. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahin G (1952) Nationalism and revolution in Indonesia. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle WR (1992) Pemilu-Pemilu Orde Baru (The general elections in the new order). LP3ES Press, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle WR (2000) Indonesia: Soeharto’s tightening grip. In: Diamond L, Marc PF (eds) Democracy in East Asia. Johns Hopkin University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Nusantara HG (ed) (1995) Atas Nama pembangunan: Bank Dunia dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia (On behalf of development: World Bank and human rights in Indonesia). Elsam Press, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabottingi M (1999) Suara Waktu [The time voice]. Airlangga Press, Surabaya

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R (1986) The rise of capital in Indonesia. Allen and Unwin Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Soekarno (1961) Dibawah Bendera Revolusi [Under revolution flag]. Jambatan Press, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Suyyadinata L (1992) Golkar dan Militer: Studi Tentang Budaya Politik (Golkar and military: a study of political culture). Gramedia Press, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshihara K (1988) The rise of ersatz capitalism in Southeast Asia. Kyoto University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Feith H (1957) The Indonesian election of 1955, Interim report series. Cornell Modern Indonesian Project, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • The Financial Times 13 October 1981

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hidayat, H. (2016). Political Transition from Soekarno to Soeharto. In: Forest Resources Management in Indonesia (1968-2004). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-745-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics