Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering ((BRIEFSELECTRIC))

  • 544 Accesses

Abstract

Advancements in wireless sensor networks have led the researchers to develop new protocols to cater all the stringent requirements of WSN. Awareness in routing protocols has been considered a most important issue because they are dependent upon the applications design and architecture. WSN systems gather data from multiple sensors to monitor some area. Networking and management of these sensors is difficult task due to various constraints imposed on tiny nodes. Routing is very challenging job in WSN due to contemporary communication. In this chapter, we have thrown light on the various challenges and design issues in WSN. A general classification of routing protocols is presented here with advantages and limitation of each scheme. Overview of applications of WSN and future trends towards the multi-hop routing protocols is discussed here with various research issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akyildiz F, Kasimoglu IH (2004) Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw 2(4):351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karl H, Andreas W (2007) Protocols and architectures for wireless sensor networks. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Estrin D, Culler D, Pister K, Sukhatme G (2002) Connecting the physical world with pervasive networks. In: IEEE Pervasive Computing, Jan 2002, pp 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stankovic JA, Wood AD, He T (2011) Realistic applications for wireless sensor networks. In: Theoretical Aspects of Distributed Computing in Sensor Networks. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 835–863

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oliveira LM, Rodrigues JJ (2011) Wireless sensor networks: a survey on environmental monitoring. J Commun 6(2):143–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aberg PA, Togawa T, Spelman FA (eds) (2002) Sensors in medicine and healthcare. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ko J, Lu C, Srivastava MB, Stankovic J, Terzis A, Welsh M (2010) Wireless sensor networks for healthcare. Proc IEEE 98(11):1947–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gungor VC, Hancke GP (2009) Industrial wireless sensor networks: Challenges, design principles, and technical approaches. Industr Electron IEEE Trans 56(10):4258–4265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clare LP, Romanov N, Twarowsk A (1999) Wireless sensor networks for area monitoring and integrated vehicle health management applications. American Institute of Aeronautics and Aeronautics (AIAA)

    Google Scholar 

  10. De Lara E, LaMarca A, Satyanarayanan M (2008) Location systems: an introduction to the technology behind location awareness. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, p 88. ISBN 978-1-59829-581-8

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Research Council (U.S.), Committee on the Future of the Global Positioning System, National Academy of Public Administration (1995) The global positioning system: a shared national asset: recommendations for technical improvements and enhancements. National Academies Press, p 16. ISBN 0-309-05283-1. Retrieved 16 Aug 2013

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schiettecatte B (2004) Interaction design for electronic musical interfaces. In Proceedings of the conference on Extended abstract on human factors in computing systems, Apr 2004, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  13. Younis M, Youssef M, Arisha K (2003) Energy-aware management in cluster-based sensor networks. Comput Netw 43(5):649–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hou YT, Shi Y, Sherali HD (2005) On energy provisioning and relay node placement for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 4(5): 2579–2590

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oyman EI, Ersoy C (2004) Multiple sink network design problem in large scale wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC 2004), Paris, June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  16. Khanna R, Liu H, Chen HH (2006) Self-organization of sensor networks using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE international conference on communications (ICC’06), Istanbul, Turkey, June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moscibroda T, Wattenhofer R (2005) Maximizing the lifetime of dominating sets. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE international parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS’05), Denver, Colorado, Apr 2005

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dasgupta K, Kukreja M, Kalpakis K (2003) Topology-aware placement and role assignment for energy-efficient information gathering in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of 8th IEEE symposium on computers, 2003. doi:10.1109/ISCC.2003.1214143

  19. Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad-hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 3:366–379. doi:10.1109/TMC.2004.41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan AP, Balakrishnan H (2002) Application specific protocol architecture for wireless micro sensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Network, pp 660–670. doi:10.1109/TWC.2002.804190

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bandyopadhyay S, Coyle E (2003) An energy efficient hierarchical clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 22nd annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (INFOCOM 2003), San Francisco, California, Apr 2003

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amis AD, Prakash R, Vuong THP, Huynh DT (2000) Max-Min d-cluster formation in wireless ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of 20th joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies (INFOCOM’2000), Mar 2000. doi:10.1109/INFCOM.2000.832171

  23. Garcia F, Solano J, Stojmenovic I (2003) Connectivity based k-hop clustering in wireless networks. Telecommun Syst 22(1):205–220

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fernandess Y, Malkhi D (2002) K-clustering in wireless ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on principles of mobile computing (POMC’02), Toulouse, France, Oct 2002

    Google Scholar 

  25. Younis M, Akkaya K, Kunjithapatham A (2003) Optimization of task allocation in a cluster–based sensor network. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE symposium on computers and communications (ISCC’2003), Antalya, Turkey, June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krishnamachari B, Estrin D, Wicker S (2002) Modeling data centric routing in wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, New York, June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gupta G, Younis M (2003) Fault-tolerant clustering of wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE wireless communication and networks conference (WCNC 2003), New Orleans, Louisiana, Mar 2003

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oyman EI, Ersoy C (2004) Multiple sink network design problem in large scale wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications (ICC 2004), Paris, June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  29. Akyildiz IF et al (2002) A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 40(8):102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Karaki JN, Kamal AE (2004) Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Wirel Commun IEEE 11(6):6–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pantazis N, Nikolidakis SA, Vergados DD (2013) Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Commun Surv Tutor IEEE 15(2):551–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pottie G, Kaiser W (2000) Wireless integrated sensor networks (WINS). Commun ACM 43(5):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Merrill WM, Sohrabi K, Girod L, Elson J, Newberg F, Kaiser W (2002) Open standard development platforms for distributed sensor networks. In: Proceedings of SPIE—unattended ground sensor technologies and applications IV (AeroSense 2002), vol 4743, Orlando, FL, Apr 2002, pp 327–337

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hill J, Szewcyk R, Woo A, Culler D, Hollar S, Pister K (2000) System architecture directions for networked sensors. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on architectural support for programming languages and operating systems (ASPLoS IX), Cambridge, MA, Nov 2000, pp 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  35. Broch J, Maltz DA, Johnson DB, Hu YC, Jetcheva J (1998) A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In: Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking (pp 85–97). ACM

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalli Rani .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rani, S., Ahmed, S.H. (2016). Introduction. In: Multi-hop Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-730-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-730-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-729-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-730-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics