Advertisement

The Quest for Regional Education Hub Status: Challenges, Possibilities and Search for New Governance in Hong Kong

  • Ka Ho MokEmail author
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 28)

Abstract

The growing global interdependence has been recognized within higher education circles for decades, usually seen as “international education” and having its primary manifestation in student and faculty exchanges between countries. Over the last decade, especially after reaching the GATS agreement, higher education has been refined in part as a tradable commodity, and the amount of “globalized education” taking place is on the increase. With the strong intention of enhancing the global competitiveness of their higher education systems, governments across different parts of the world, especially in Asia, have engaged in the quest for different forms of hub status such as education hub, student hub, talent hub, and knowledge/information hub. Transnational higher education has become increasingly popular in Asian societies. Some Asian governments have invited foreign universities to set up their campuses to provide transnational education programs, while others have engaged in the quest for regional education hub status. The quest to become a regional hub of education inevitably leads to a new terrain of governance, complex and sometimes convoluted, which involves problems of coordination (and accountability and transparency), especially when dealing with multinational businesses, but which can bring to the state benefits in terms of flexibilities and forms of flexibilization and substitution which are not normally possible in administrative systems. This chapter sets out against this wider policy context to critically examine how Hong Kong stands in the journey toward making the city-state a regional education hub (When referring to “education hub” here, we adopt the definition by Knight that “an education hub is a planned effort to build a critical mass of local and international actors strategically engaged in crossborder education, training, knowledge production and innovation initiatives” (Knight, J Stud Int Educ 15(3):221–240, 2011, p. 277)), with particular reference to examining the major challenges and possibilities, as well as the implications, for university governance with the rise of transnational education programs and proliferation of providers in education.

Keywords

Education hub Transnational higher education New university governance Governed market Varieties of regulatory regimes Market-accelerationist state Market-facilitating state 

Notes

References

  1. Chan, D. K. K. (2008, December 10–11). Global Agenda, local response: Changing university governance and academic reflections in Hong Kong’s Higher Education. Paper presented at the symposium on Positioning University in the Globalized World: Changing Governance and Coping Strategies in Asia, the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  2. Chan, D. K. K., & Lo, W. (2007). Running universities as enterprises: University governance Changes in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27(3), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chan, D. K. K., & Lo, W. (2008). University restructuring in East Asia: Trends, challenges and prospects. Policy Futures in Education, 6(5), 641–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan, D. K. K., & Ng, P. T. (2008). Developing transnational higher education: Comparing the approaches of Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Reform, 17(3), 291–307.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, Y. C., Ng, S. W., Cheung, A. C. K., Choi, P. L., Tang, Y. F. & Yuen, Y. M. (2009). A technical research report on the development of Hong Kong as a regional education hub. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Education.Google Scholar
  6. Dou, L., & Knight, J. (2014). Emerging hubs: South Korea, Sri Lanka, Mauritius and Bahrain. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. East–west Centre. (2010, September 13–24). The IFE 2020 tool kit. Paper presented at the International For Education 2010 Leadership Institute, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  8. Education Bureau. (2015b). Statistical information. Education commission (2000). Review of Education System Reform Proposal: Excel and Grow. Hong Kong: Government Printer. http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/postsecondary/non-local-higher-professional-edu/stat-info/index.html
  9. Education Commission. (2000) Education Reform in Hong Kong, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printer.Google Scholar
  10. French, N. J. (1999). Transnational education—Competition or complementarity: The case of Hong Kong. Higher Education in Europe, 24(2), 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong Kong Council for Accreditation of Academic and Vocational Qualifications (HKCAAVQ). (2007, December). Code of practice for non-local courses recommended by the Hong Kong Council for accreditation of academic and vocational qualifications. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  12. Hong Kong Council for Accreditation of Academic and Vocational Qualifications (HKCAAVQ). (2008, May). Guidelines on four-stage quality assurance process under the qualifications framework: QF Levels 1–3 (Version 1.0). Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  13. Information Portal for Accredited Post-secondary Programs. (2013). Full-time accredited self-financing post-secondary programs, 2004/05 to 2013/14 Academic Years. http://www.ipass.gov.hk/edb/index.php/en/home/statheader/stat/stat_pg_index
  14. Knight, J. (2002). Trade talk: An analysis of the impact of trade liberalization and the general agreement on trade in services on higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 6(3), 209–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knight, J. (2011). Education hubs: A fad, a brand or an innovation. Journal for Studies in International Education, 15(3), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knight, J. (Ed.). (2014). International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Kooiman, J. (1993). Socio-political governance: Introduction. In J. Kooiman (Ed.), Modern governance: New government-society interactions (pp. 1–8). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lai, A., & Maclean, R. (2014). Managing human capital in world cities: Reflections on Hong Kong developing into an education hub. In K. H. Mok & K. M. Yu (Eds.), Internationalization of Higher Education in East Asia. (pp. 42–57). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Levi–Faur, D. (1998). The competition state as a Neo–Mercantilist state: Understanding the restructuring of national and global telecommunications. Journal of Socio–Economics, 27(6), 655–86.Google Scholar
  20. McBurnie, G., & Ziguras, C. (2001). The regulation of transnational higher education in Southeast Asia: Case studies of Hong Kong. Malaysia and Australia. Higher Education, 42, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mok, K. H. (2008a). Varieties of regulatory regimes in Asia: The liberalization of the higher education market and changing governance in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. The Pacific Review, 21(2), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mok, K. H. (2008b). Positioning as regional hub of higher education: Changing governance and regulatory reforms in Singapore and Malaysia. International Journal of Educational Reform, 17(3), 230–250.Google Scholar
  23. Mok, Ka Ho. (2010). The changing role of university in promoting entrepreneurship and innovation: A comparative study of selected Asian economies. Paper published on-line at the World Bank website.Google Scholar
  24. Mok, K. H. (2011). The quest for regional hub of education: Growing Heterarchies, organizational hybridization and new governance in Singapore and Malaysia. Journal of Education Policy, 26(1), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mok, K. H. (2012). International benchmarking with the best: The varied role of the state in the quest for regional education hubs in Malaysia and Hong Kong. In F. Waldow & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Policy borrowing and lending in education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Mok, K. H. (2013). The quest for entrepreneurial universities in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mok, K. H., & Bodycott, P. (2014). Hong Kong: The quest for regional education hub status. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Mok, K. H., & Ong, K. C. (2012). Asserting brain power and expanding educational service: Searching for new governance and regulatory regimes in Singapore and Hong Kong. In D. E. Neubauer (Ed.), The emergent knowledge society and the future of higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Mok, K. H., & Yu, K. M. (Eds.). (2014). Internationalization of higher education in East Asia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Sidhu, R., Ho, K.-C., & Yeoh, B. S. A. (2014). Singapore: Building a knowledge and education hub. In J. Knight (Ed.), International education hubs. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Task Force on Economic Challenges, Hong Kong. (2009, June 22). Recommendations from the task force on economic challenges for promoting the development of the six economic areas. Hong Kong: Author. http://www.fso.gov.hk/tfec/eng/doc/TFEC%20-%20final%20Recommendations%20_TFEC-INFO-13_%20_Eng_.pdf. Accessed on 30 Aug 2009.
  32. Tsang, D. Y. K. (2007). The 2007–2008 policy address: The new direction for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  33. Hwa, T. C. (2000). The 2000 policy address: Quality education, policy objective for education and manpower bureau. Hong Kong: Government Printer.Google Scholar
  34. UNESCO/Council of Europe. (2001). Code of good practice in the provision of transnational education. Riga, Latvia: UNESCO-CEPES. http://www.cepes.ro/hed/recogn/groups/transnat/code.htm. Accessed on 29 Aug 2009.
  35. University Grants Committee (UGC). (2002). Higher education in Hong Kong: Report of the University Grants committee. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  36. University Grants Committee (UGC). (2004a). Hong Kong higher education: To make a difference, to move with the times. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  37. University Grants Committee (UGC). (2004b). Hong Kong higher education integration matters: A report of the institutional integration working party of the University Grants Committee. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  38. University Grants Committee (UGC). (2013). Higher education in Hong Kong: Report of the University Grants Committee. Hong Kong: Author. http://cdcf.ugc.edu.hk/cdcf/searchStatSiteReport.do
  39. Yang, R. (2006). Transnational higher education in Hong Kong: An analysis. In H. Futao (Ed.), Transnational higher education in Asia and the Pacific Region (pp. 41–67). Hiroshima, Japan: Research Institute for Higher Education, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lingnan UniversityTuen MunHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations