Abstract
Adequate guidance, constructive feedback and professional support during teaching practice can significantly change a mediocre student teacher to one who teaches more outstandingly. This study investigates the nature of supervisor support during reflective inquiry sessions, and how the support contributes to student teachers’ professional growth as teachers-to-be. In-depth interviews with five student teachers provided data for the study. The findings revealed that the focus of reflections in the discussions between the student teachers and their supervisors revolved around the direction and implementation of the lesson; professional qualities; expressions of personal feelings, opinions and concerns; achievability of the pre-determined learning outcomes, student teachers’ manifested behaviors; and other professional supports. Reflecting on the research participants’ levels of reflectivity, 45 % interview entries were coded at level one -Technical Rationality (TR), 50 % at level two – Practical Action (PA), and 5 % at level three – Critical Reflection (CR). The findings also showed that the development of student teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in teaching was due to three contributing factors: the employment of reflective techniques by the supervisors, the value of accepting the strengths and weaknesses in teaching experienced by the trainees, and the applications of the outcomes gained during the reflective inquiry sessions on the upcoming lessons. These findings imply that supervisors must take reflective inquiry conferences more seriously and recognize that productive sessions with their trainees are critical in developing future teachers with sound pedagogical know-how.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anglea, K. A. (2009). Rediscovering purpose: The power of reflective inquiry as professional development. Retrieved June 15, 2012, from Proquest Database.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barone, D., Maddux, J. E., & Snyder, C. B. (1997). Social cognitive psychology: History & current domains. New York: Plenum.
Borko, H., & Mayfield, V. (1995). The roles of the cooperating teacher and university supervisor in learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 501–518.
Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of contexts (Studies in higher education). London: Routledge.
Dellinger, A. (2001). A study of the measurement and sources of teachers’ self and collective efficacy beliefs in professional learning environments. Retrieved March 4, 2013, from Proquest Database.
Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.
Farrel, T. (2003). Reflective teaching: Principles and practices. English Teaching Forum, 41(4), 14–21.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Heng, L. W., & Khim, T. S. (2004). Reflective practice in Malaysia teacher education: Assumptions, practices and challenges. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.
Maddux, J. E. (2009). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 469–479.
Mc Clelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Moon, J. A. (2008). Reflection in learning and professional development. London/New York: Routledge Falmer Taylor & Francis Group.
O’Donoghue, T. A., & Brooker, R. (1996). The rhetoric and reality of promoting reflective practice during practice teaching: An Australian case study. Journal of Teacher Education, 47(2). Proquest Journals Database.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 609–611.
Rubina, K. (2004). Using the reflective approach in a teaching practicum. Retrieved October 28, from, http://www.melta.org.my/modules/tinycontent/Dos/rubina_khan.Pdf
Skinner, E. A. (1995). Perceived control, motivation, and coping. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205–228. Retrieved August 10, 2012, from Procedia and Behavioral Sciences Database.
White, R. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wan Mahzan, M.S., Abdullah, N., Mohammad Nor, N.H. (2016). The Impact of Reflective Inquiry on Professional Development of Student Teachers. In: Fook, C., Sidhu, G., Narasuman, S., Fong, L., Abdul Rahman, S. (eds) 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-663-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-664-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)