Skip to main content
  • 1675 Accesses

Abstract

Being able to read academic texts and think critically is a much sought after skill in today’s globalised work environments. Postgraduate students need to learn how to develop their critical literacy awareness by being able to read and discuss a wide range of texts as it is seen as a response to the social construction of one’s peers, culture, family, classrooms, neighbours, communities and world (Lesley M, J Adolesc Adult Lit 48(4):320–334, 2004). Responding to local concerns about the lack of attention accorded to the development of postgraduate students’ critical literacy awareness, this paper suggests the use of critical literacy strategies advocated by the New London Group (Har Educ Rev 66(1):60–92, 1996) and Kress (Literacy in the new media age. Routledge, New York, 2003) to increase students’ motivation and engagement in multimodal environments. Two course lecturers and 30 MA postgraduate students from two public universities in Malaysia participated in this study. The qualitative data cover two intact classes of each of the lecturers who teach literacy and pedagogy courses. The findings gleaned from the audio-taped student-teacher interactions and focus group interviews suggest that majority of the postgraduate students appreciated the following developmental stages in using the four knowledge processes in classroom activities: situated practice, overt instruction, critical framing and transformed practice. The implications of the study suggest that university lecturers can actively use the critical literacy awareness framework in their classrooms as it can generate active student voices and promote more meaningful learning experiences among their postgraduate students. Such pedagogical strategies can be integrated into current higher education curriculums to enhance active student participation in taught postgraduate classrooms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Behrman, H. E. (2006). Teaching about language, power and text: A review of classroom practices that support critical literacy. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(6), 490–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, C., & Jay, L. (2010). Innovation in postgraduate teaching: Mixed methods to enhance learning and learning about learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwyn, A., & Stables, A. (2004). Learning to read critically in language and literacy. New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janes, D. (2009). Designing multiliteracies curricula for various target learners. Retrieved September 20, 2013, from http://drofilm1.edublogs.org/artifacts-2/designing-multiliteracies-curricula-for-various-target-learners/

  • Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2004). Designs for learning. E-learning, 1(1), 38–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, S. (2013). Critical literacy practices of English majors in a tertiary institution. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 13(2), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, S., Ganapathy, M., & Sidhu, G. K. (2012). Designing learning elements using the multiliteracies approach in an ESL writing classroom. 3L Language, Linguistics Literature: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(3), 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. L. (2008, March 5–7). The role of postgraduate education in research systems. Paper presented at the UNESCO/DCU workshop on ‘Trends in Postgraduate Education’, Dublin City University, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Y. L. (2008). Language, culture and literacy: Meaning-making in global contexts. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Y. L., Wong, F. F., & Ismail, K. (2012). Students’ critical consciousness through critical literacy awareness. Gema Online® Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 727–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krish, P., Latif, H., & Zalina Mohd Lazim. (2012). Editorial: Interdisciplinary perspectives on culture, power and values: Language and literary studies in the local-global context. Gema Online ® Journal of Language Studies (Special Edition), 2, 339–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesley, M. (2004). Looking for critical literacy with postbaccalaureate content area literacy students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(4), 320–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M., & DeVoogd, G. (2004). Critical literacy as comprehensions: Expanding reader response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48, 52–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morshidi Sirat, P. A., Muniandy, B., Fazal M., Harshita A., Azman, H., Muhammad Kamarul Kabilan., & Ratna, R. A. R. (2008). The University curriculum and the employment of graduates. In Z. M. Don (Ed.), Enhancing the quality of higher education through research: Shaping future policy (p. 939). Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, (MoHE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nambiar, R. M. K. (2007). Enhancing academic literacy among tertiary learners: A Malaysian experience. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 13, 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normazidah Che Musa, Koo, Y. L., & Azman, H. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. Gema Online ® Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescatore, C. (2007). High school students’ instructional preferences when reading literary works of art. The Reading Matrix, 4(2), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, L. M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddel & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1363–1398). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarjit Kaur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kaur, S., Sidhu, G.K. (2016). Postgraduate Students’ Engagement Through Critical Literacy Awareness. In: Fook, C., Sidhu, G., Narasuman, S., Fong, L., Abdul Rahman, S. (eds) 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-663-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-664-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics