Abstract
Innovation in the green economy entails transformative change in society. Vital infrastructure technologies in the fields of energy, water, communication, waste handling, and so on have many interdependencies with other economic sectors. Hence, introducing green innovation in such sectors has complex repercussions and requires many complementary changes to be made elsewhere in the economy as well. Therefore, such innovations come with large uncertainties and risks. They need a long time to be fully developed and assimilated into society, and this is never a smooth journey because many effects were not foreseen at the start. Undesirable social, economic and environmental consequences can easily occur along the way. Therefore, innovation in the green economy introduces the need to foreground issues of accountability more prominently and explicitly throughout the innovation process. This implies that it is necessary to start defining accountability from the beginning of the innovation process—not only toward the end. This can help us to figure out beforehand about what (negative) impacts could possibly emerge and how they can be prevented, in order to lead to satisfactory outcomes for all stakeholders. Therefore, this paper attempts to create an understanding of the importance of embedding accountability throughout innovation process in the green economy by addressing the following questions: How do we define accountability for innovation in the green economy? What kind of approach may help us in embedding accountability throughout the innovation process in the green economy? To answer these questions, the concept of responsible innovation is introduced and the application of the approach is illustrated through a case study. The paper concludes that responsible innovation approach allows the careful scrutinizing of the (emerging) impacts of innovation and provides a clear map of the roles, tasks, and liabilities of innovation actors as the basis for embedding accountability throughout the innovation process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are also recent approaches that are very closely related to the RI approach, for example the term “responsive research” used by researchers in the UK and “reflexive modernization” used by René Kemp and Jan Peter Voss. (See e.g., https://blogs.nottingham.ac.uk/makingsciencepublic/2014/03/31/responsive-research-which-research-whose-responsibility/.).
References
UNEP. What is the “Green Economy”? 2010; Available from: http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/AboutGEI/WhatisGEI/tabid/29784/Default.aspx.
UNCSD. The Future We Want. Official Outcome Document of the Rio + 20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro. 2012; Available from: http://www.uncsd2012.org/index.php?menu=140.
Chapple, K., et al., Innovation in the Green Economy: An Extension of the Regional Innovation System Model? Economic Development Quarterly, 2011. 25(1): p. 5–25.
Peng, L. and G.-S. Yan, Clean Energy Grid-Connected Technology Based on Smart Grid. Energy Procedia, 2011. 12(0): p. 213–218.
Verbong, G.P.J., S. Beemsterboer, and F. Sengers, Smart grids or smart users? Involving users in developing a low carbon electricity economy. Energy Policy, 2013. 52(0): p. 117–125.
Phuangpornpitak, N. and S. Tia, Opportunities and Challenges of Integrating Renewable Energy in Smart Grid System. Energy Procedia, 2013. 34(0): p. 282–290.
van de Poel, I., et al., The Problem of Many Hands: Climate Change as an Example. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2012. 18(1): p. 49–67.
Owen, R. and N. Goldberg, Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Analysis, 2010. 30(11): p. 1699–1707.
Singh, R. and O. Kroesen, Understanding responsible innovation from developing countries perspectives, in The 2nd Conference on Responsible Innovation 2012. 2012: The Hague, The Netherlands.
Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten, Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 2013. 42(9): p. 1568–1580.
Setiawan, A.D. and R. Singh, Responsible Innovation in Practice: The Adoption of Solar PV in Telecom Towers in Indonesia, in Responsible Innovation Volume II, J. Van den Hoven, E. J. Koops, H. A. Romijn, T. E. Swierstra and I. Oosterlaken, Editor. Forthcoming, Springer.
Ubois, J., Responsible Innovation/Sustainable Innovation, in Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, November 2010. 2010.
Halle, M., Accountability in the Green Economy. Review of Policy Research, 2011. 28(5): p. 473–477.
Leat, D., Are voluntary organizations accountable?, in Voluntary Agencies: Challenges of Organization and Management, D. Billis, and Harris, M., Editor. 1996: Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Taylor, M., Democracy and Accountability, in International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home, S.J. Smith, Editor. 2012, Elsevier: San Diego. p. 314–318.
Hellström, T., Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society, 2003. 25(3): p. 369–384.
Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 1998. 10(2): p. 175–195.
Lee, R.G., Look at Mother Nature on the Run in the 21st Century: Responsibility, Research and Innovation. Transnational Environmental Law, 2012. 1(01): p. 105–117.
Sutcliffe, H., A Report on Responsible Research and Innovation for the European Commission. 2011: MATTER, London.
von Schomberg, R., Prospects for technology assessment in a framework ofresponsible research and innovation. In: Dusseldorp, M., Beecroft, R. (Eds.), Tech-nikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer. Vs Verlag,Methoden, Wiesbaden. 2011.
De Moor, K., et al., Towards Innovation Foresight: Two empirical case studies on future TV experiences for/by users. Futures, (0).
Peter, M.K. and D.G. Jarratt, The practice of foresight in long-term planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (0).
Sarpong, D., M. Maclean, and C. Davies, A matter of foresight: How practices enable (or impede) organizational foresightfulness. European Management Journal, 2013. 31(6): p. 613–625.
Muniesa, F. and M. Lenglet, Responsible Innovation in Finance: Directions and Implications, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 185–198.
Parkhill, K., et al., Deliberation and Responsible Innovation: A Geoengineering Case Study, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 219–239.
Stahl, B.C., G. Eden, and M. Jirotka, Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs, in Responsible Innovation. 2013, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 199–218.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP), the Ministry of Finance of Republic of Indonesia for the scholarship support to the first author of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Setiawan, A.D., Singh, R., Romijn, H. (2017). Embedding Accountability Throughout the Innovation Process in the Green Economy: The Need for an Innovative Approach. In: Taufik, T., et al. ICoSI 2014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-661-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-661-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-660-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-661-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)