Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Means and Variability on Creative Thinking: Patterns in Childhood, Adolescence, and Emerging Adulthood

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

Gender differences in creative thinking remain an unresolved research question. Researchers have increasingly recognized that both mean and variability analyses should be conducted to uncover a complete picture of gender differences. Moreover, it has been suggested that gender differences in intellectual abilities are dynamic across age, and gender differences need to be analyzed developmentally. This study aimed to reframe the study of gender differences in creative thinking by (1) using both mean and variability analyses and (2) employing a developmental perspective. Creativity was assessed with the Test for Creative Thinking–Drawing Production (TCT–DP) which was developed based on the componential model of creativity. The TCT–DP scores of six age groups (N = 2,224), which included participants of ages 3–4 years, 5–7 years, 10–12 years, 13–15 years, 18–19 years, and 20–22 years, were analyzed. Results showed that while mean analyses generally revealed trivial gender differences, variability analyses tend to support great gender differences. Furthermore, developmental data demonstrated that the magnitude and the direction of gender differences change across age. While greater female variability (favoring girls) was observed in young children, a reverse pattern that was found in adolescents and young adults. The findings shed lights on the different developmental trajectories of boys and girls in creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arden, R., & Plomin, R. (2006). Sex differences in variance of intelligence across childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1969). Social-learning theory of identificatory processes. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 213–262). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chae, S. (2003). Adaptation of a picture-type creativity test for pre-school children. Language Testing, 20, 178–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, P. C., & Lau, S. (2010). Gender differences in the creativity of Hong Kong school children: Comparison by using the new electronic Wallach-Kogan creativity tests. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 194–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colom, R., & Lynn, R. (2004). Testing the developmental theory of sex differences in intelligence on 12–18 year olds. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: Further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, H. (1894/1934). Man and woman: A study of human sexual characters. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M., Marschik, P. B., Tulviste, T., Almgren, M., Pereira, M. P., & Wehberg, S. et al. (2012). Differences between girls and boys in emerging language skills: Evidence from 10 language communities. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 326–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Review of Educational Research, 62, 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (1997). Sex differences in intelligence: Implications for education. American Psychologist, 52, 1091–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, W. J., & Wong, W. C. (2011). Gender differences in creative thinking revisited: Findings from analysis of variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 807–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, W. J., & Wong, W. C. (2014). Greater male variability in overexcitabilities: Domain-specific patterns. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, W. J., Wong, W. C., Li, Y., & Xu, H. (2013). A study of the greater male variability hypothesis in creative thinking in Mainland China: Male superiority exists. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 882–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jellen, H., & Urban, K. K. (1986). The TCT–DP (Test for Creative Thinking–Drawing Production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 138–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I. J. (2008). Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: A new look at the old question. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 518–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N. (1974). Creativity and sex differences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 8, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T., Pacteau, C., Jacquet, A. Y., & Caroff, X. (2010). Children’s creative potential: An empirical study of measurement issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 388–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1999). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A developmental theory. Intelligence, 27, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., Allik, J., & Must, O. (2000). Sex differences in brain size, stature and intelligence in children and adolescents: some evidence from Estonia. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 555–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, R., Hurks, P. P. M., Meijs, C., Wassenberg, R., & Jolles, J. (2011). Sex differences in arithmetical performance scores: Central tendency and variability. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matud, M. P., Rodríguez, C., & Grande, J. (2007). Gender differences in creative thinking. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1137–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1992). Variability—A pernicious hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 62, 85–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudowicz, E. (2004). Applicability of the test of Creative Thinking-Drawing Production for assessing creative potential of Hong Kong adolescents. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, S., Deary, I. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Sex differences in cognitive abilities test scores: A UK national picture. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 463–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K. (2004). Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT–DP). The concept, application, evaluation, and international studies. Psychology Science, 46, 387–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1995/2010). Test for Creative Thinking–Drawing Production (TCT–DP). Manual. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Pearson Assessment & Information GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vista, A., & Care, E. (2011). Gender differences in variance and means on the Naglieri Non-verbal Ability Tests: Data from the Philippines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 292–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work described in this paper was partly supported by the Internal Research Grant of The Hong Kong Institute of Education (No. RG73/2011–2012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mavis Wu-Jing He .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

He, M.WJ., Wong, WC., Hui, A.NN. (2015). Gender Differences in Means and Variability on Creative Thinking: Patterns in Childhood, Adolescence, and Emerging Adulthood. In: Tan, AG., Perleth, C. (eds) Creativity, Culture, and Development. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-636-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics