Abstract
Despite the increasing realization of the importance of creativity and innovation , there is little in the way of practical guidance regards their implementation into an organizational environment. This lack of guidance, stems in part at least, from a lack of understanding of the core processes that stimulate or undermine people’s motivation to be creative. This, in turn, may be caused by a traditional view of creativity being viewed as an attribute of ‘special’ people with less consideration for the social and environmental aspects of the structure within which innovation occurs. The individual versus the group model of creative behavior outlined in this chapter attempts to go some way to redressing this imbalance, and outlines creativity as a fundamental human attribute that represents our need to be distinct and individual. Watching my five year-old granddaughter growing up, I am struck by the fact that every day she has a thought that leads to an action that is a little bit different than before. That is to say, every day she thinks something or generates an idea that changes her world in some small way. This seemingly rather trivial observation has fundamental implications for the role of creativity in our development, our organizations, our lives, and ultimately, the evolution of the human race. In other words, the process of growing up, observing, learning and making choices is intimately linked to the creative process, and one that we all go through. Whether organizations or children are our focus, when studying creativity maybe we should be studying it as a social phenomenon first, and understand that, before we increase the magnification of our research microscopes down to the individual level. Secondly, since my granddaughter’s creative curiosity is a natural, frequent, and possibly universal, phenomenon, perhaps we might find it more profitable to study creativity from the perspective: What is it about our socialization processes that, in some cases, suppresses our motivation to be creative as we mature? Indeed, there is increasing research interest in examining our organisations in the same way and asking: What is it within them that enhances or undermines individuals’ motivation to be creative?
Discovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.
Albert von Szent-Györgyi
[Irving Good (Ed.), The Scientist Speculates]
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identification, self-categorization and social influence. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 195–228.
Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2006). Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 479–497.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 3–15.
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333.
Anti-polio Vaccine Guaranteed by Salk. (1953, November 13). The new york times.
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439–476.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 177, 497–529.
Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Bettenhausen, K. L., & Murnighan, J. K. (1991). The development of an intergroup norm and the effects of interpersonal and structural challenges. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 20–35.
Bhawuk, D. P. (2003). Culture’s influence on creativity: The case of Indian spirituality. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 1–22.
Birenbaum, A., & Sagarin, E. (1976). Norms and human behavior. New York: Praeger.
Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B. (1994). Human resource management practices and total quality management. Atlanta, GA: Paper presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management.
Brandstätter, V., Herrmann, M., & Schüler, J. (2013). The struggle of giving up personal goals affective, physiological, and cognitive consequences of an action crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1668–1682.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.
Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208–212.
Bruner, J. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking. New York: Atherton Press.
Chu, S. & Townes, C. (2003). Arthur schawlow. In Edward, P. L. (Ed.), Biographical memoirs. 83 (p. 202). National Academy of Sciences.
Connolly, T., Routhieaux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of an underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490–503.
Culshaw, J. (1950). Rachmaninov: The man and his music. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22–49.
Deaux, K., & Reid, A. (2000). Contemplating collectivism. In S. Stryker, T. J. Owens, & R. W. White (Eds.), Self, identity, and social movements (pp. 175–190). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392–403.
Earley, P. C. (1993). East meets West meets Mideast: Further explorations of collectivistic and individualistic work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 319–348.
Earley, P. C., & Gibson, C. B. (1998). Taking stock in our progress on individualism-collectivism: 100 years of solidarity and community. Journal of Management, 24, 265–304.
Elder, G. H., & Clipp, E. C. (1988). Wartime losses and social bonding: Influence across 40 years in men’s lives. Psychiatry, 51, 177–198.
Forsyth, D. R. (2006). Group dynamics. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
Freud, S. (1908). Creative writers and day-dreaming. Standard edition, 9, 141–153
Friedman, R. S., & Forster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.
Friedman, R. S., & Forster, J. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41–55.
Friedman, R. S., & Forster, J. (2005). Effects of motivational cues on perceptual asymmetry: Implications for creativity and analytical problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 263–275.
Gilovich, T., Keltner, D., & Nisbett, R. (2006). Social psychology. New York: Norton.
Grassian, S. (1983). Psychopathological effects of solitary confinement. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1450–1454.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. Waltham: Academic Press.
Haslam, S. A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 384–401.
Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280–293.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1993). Relational orientation in Asian social psychology. In U. Kim & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 240–259). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Ho, D. Y. F., & Chiu, C. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory, method and applications (pp. 200–212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw Hill.
Janis, I., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Kabanoff, B., & Rossiter, J. (1993). Recent developments in applied creativity. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9, 283–324.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681–706.
Krumm, D. J. (2000). Psychology at work: An introduction to industrial/organizational psychology. New York: Macmillan.
Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361–388.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand.
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
Miron-Spektor, E., Gino, F., & Argote, L. (2011). Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 229–240.
Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3–23.
Newcomb, T. M. (1958). Attitude development as a function of reference groups: The Bennington study. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 265–275). New York: Holt.
Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. (1967). The process of creative thinking. In H. Gruber, G. Terrel, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63–119). New York: Atherton.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1996). Cultures as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. In A. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 157–200). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Osborn, A. F. (1948). Your creative power. New York: Scribner.
Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
Oyserman, D. (1993). The lens of personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 993–1009.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.
Paulus, P. B. (2002). Different ponds for different fish: A contrasting perspective on team innovation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 394–399.
Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575–586.
Paulus, P. B., & Nijstad, B. A. (2003). Group creativity: An introduction. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 3–11). New York: Oxford University Press.
Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76–87.
Penner, L., Brannick, M. T., Webb, S., & Connell, P. (2005). Effects on volunteering of the September 11, 2001, attacks: An archival analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1333–1360.
Piasecki, B. (2013). Why teams matter more than ever: Collaboration is critical in today’s economy. Public Management, 95, 12–15.
Rank, O. (1932/1989). Art and artist: Creative urge and personality development. New York: Knopf.
Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 518–528.
Rofe, Y. (1984). Stress and affiliation: A utility theory. Psychological Review, 91, 235–250.
Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation: Experimental studies of the sources of gregariousness. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 21, 139–157.
Shalley, C. E., & Zhou, J. (2008). Organizational creativity research: A historical overview. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–31).
Sherif, M. (1936). The Psychology of Social Norms. Oxford, U.K.: Harper.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A Psychology of Science. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, G. J. W., & Van der Meer, G. (1994). Creativity through psychosomatics. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 159–170.
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
Stein, M. (1974). Stimulating creativity (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology, 3, 83–100.
Thompson, L. L. (2003). Making the team: A guide for managers. Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Unsworth, K. (2001). Unpacking creativity. Academy of Management Review, 26, 289–297.
Van der Meer, J. D. (1996). Profile of an innovative organisation. In J. Prokopenko & K. North (Eds.), Productivity and quality management: A modular programme. Geneva: ILO.
Van Maanen, J. (1991). The smile factory: Work at Disneyland. In P. J. Frost, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture (pp. 58–76). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Voronov, M., & Singer, J. (2002). The myth of individualism-collectivism: A critical review. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 461–480.
Walton, R. E. (1980). Establishing and maintaining high commitment work systems. In J. R. Kimberly (Ed.), The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations (pp. 208–290). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Walton, A. P., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2012). Creativity in its social context: The interplay of organizational norms, situational threat, and gender. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 208–219.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walton, A.P. (2016). Creativity and a Human Dichotomy: Individual or Part of a Team?. In: Corazza, G., Agnoli, S. (eds) Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-617-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-618-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)