Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking pp 33–52Cite as

A Review of Integrated Approaches to the Study of Creativity: A Proposal for a Systems Framework for Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

Abstract

Since the inception of creativity research, creativity has been thought of and described in terms of the 4Ps: person, product, process and press (Rhodes in The Phi Delta Kappan 42(7):305–310, 1961). Each component has been favoured during different decades of the twentieth century and has settled into different sub-disciplines of psychology as well as other areas such as human resources, management and entrepreneurial studies. This monolithic approach is useful in understanding a certain aspect of creativity such as personality, however, the 4Ps do not happen in isolation. Although Rhodes’ model suggested that all four “Ps” should be viewed in conjunction with one another, little contemporary research has used a more integrated approach. This chapter has three main aims. Firstly, to provide a review of the current models that take on an integrated, ecological, or systems approach to the study of creativity. These models will then be assessed for their strengths, weaknesses and their contribution to understanding creativity as a multi-faceted phenomenon. Lastly, this chapter will propose a framework for a new, integrated model for the study of creativity that synthesises the strengths from extant models and addresses the weaknesses that were identified in the review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Straw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of the creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2008). Studying creativity, its processes, and its antecedents: An exploration of the componential theory of creativity. In J. Zhou, & C. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 33–64). New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 478–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. X. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. (2014). Toward avoiding an empirical march to nowhere. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(1), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectic perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2(3), 305–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67, 380–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M., & Amabile, T. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 385–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996a). Creativity. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996b). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Handbook of creativity (p. 313). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2006). Developing creativity. Developing creativity in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1985). The discipline of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, T. M. (2005). Creativity in the context of team diversity: Team leader perspectives. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 207–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Byron, K. (2011). Rewards and creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 313–318). New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Facaoaru, C. (1985). Kreativität in Wissenschaft und Technik [Creativity in science and technology]. Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. (2010). The function of personality in creativity: The nature and nurture of the creative personality. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 113–130). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Firestien, R. L. (1990). Effects of creative problem solving training on communication behaviors in small groups. Small Group Research, 21(4), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. G., Macrosson, W. D. K., & Wong, J. (1998). Cognitive style and team role preference. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 13(8), 544–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A., & Bachtiar, V. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 613–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P., Machin, S., & Van Reenen, J. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. The RAND Journal of Economics, (24), 198–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., & McGarvey, H. R. (1937). Experimental studies of thought and reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 34(6), 327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1989). Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1981). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1(1), 27–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 93–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 14, 469–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haner, U. (2005). Spaces for creativity and Innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. Based on a colloquium, “toward a psychology of creative environments: an ecological perspective,”. Presented at the Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California, Berkeley, September 1984. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B., & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, S., & Aerts, W. (2011). Linking problem-solving style and creative organisational climate: An exploratory interactionist study. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 21(2), 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, S., & Treffinger, D. (2004). Celebrating 50 years of reflective practice: Versions of creative problem solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(2), 75–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, K. & Drown, D. (2012). Organizations and creativity: Trends in research, status of education and practice, agenda for the future. In M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity. Access Online via Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: innovation and productivity in American corporations. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007). Values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazier, C., & Shore, B. (1995). Strategy flexibility in more and less competent students on mathematic word problems. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennel, V., Reiter-Palmon, R., de Vreede, T., & de Vreede, G. J. (2013). Creativity in teams: An examination of team accuracy in the idea evaluation and selection process. In 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 630–639). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontoghiorghes, C., Awbre, S. M., & Feurig, P. L. (2005). Examining the relationship between learning organization characteristics and change adaptation, innovation, and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(2), 185–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotrlik, J., & Higgins, C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19(1), 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. Kaufman, & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzberg, T. R. (1998). Creative thinking, a cognitive aptitude, and integrative joint gain: A study of negotiator creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzberg, T. (2005). Feeling creative being creative: An empirical study of diversity and creativity in teams. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. (2001). Models of the creative process: past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M. (2014). The empirical march: Making science better at self-correction. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(1), 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makel, M., & Plucker, J. (2014). Creativity is more than novelty: Reconsidering replication as a creativity act. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(1), 27–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E.C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1972). “A holistic approach to creativity,” in Taylor, C. Climate For Creativity. New York: Pergaman.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGourty, J., Tarshis, L. A., & Dominick, P. (1996). Managing innovation: Lessons from world class organizations. International Journal of Technology Management, 11(3–4), 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, P. (2012). Constraining and enabling creativity: The theoretical ideas surrounding creativity, agency and structure. IJCPS-International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 22(1), 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miliken, F., Bartel, C., & Kurtzberg, T. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups. In P. Paulis & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity (pp. 32–62). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 740–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2011). Beyond postnormal times: The future of creativity and the creativity of the future. Futures, 43(2), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1995). Deconstructing the lone genius myth: Toward a contextual view of creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 35(3), 69–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (Ed.). (2011). Handbook of organizational creativity. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., & Sager, C. E. (2003). Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical and creative thinking (pp. 19–68). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Uhlman, C. E., & Costanza, D. P. (1993). Personality, adaptability, and performance: Performance on well-defined problem solving tasks. Human Performance, 6(3), 241–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., & Robledo, I. C. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Importance and approaches. In M. Mumford (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 3–16). Access Online via Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 235–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. (2001). On the use of college students in social science research: Insights from a second-order meta-analysis. Journal of consumer research, 28(3), 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhu, V., Sutton, C., & Sauser, W. (2008). Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 20(1), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E. B. (2007). Managing invention and innovation. Research-Technology Management, 50(1), 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, L., & Lin, H. (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 18, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1991). The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(5), 435–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilpzand, M. C., Herold, D. M., & Shalley, C. E. (2010). Members “openness to experience and teams” creative performance. Small Group Research, 42(1), 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E. (2002). How valid and useful is the integrative model for understanding work groups’ creativity and innovation? Applied Psychology, 51(3), 406–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1963). A transactional approach to creativity. In Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 217–227). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2005). Creativity or creativities? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. and Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). USA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggar, S. (2001). Group composition, creative synergy, and group performance. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(4), 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A, I. I. I. (1997). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organization change and renewal. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Angle, H. L. (1989). Suggestions for managing the innovation journey. Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartanian, O. (2014). Toward a cumulative psychological science of aesthetics, creativity and the arts. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(1), 15–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The history and status of general systems theory. Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. W., & Horng, R. Y. (2002). The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B., & Kolomyts, Y. (2010). Cognition and creativity. In Kaufman, J. & Sternberg, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 93–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An Integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, L. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54(8), 594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1989). Individual differences in creativity. In J. Glover, R. Ronning, & C. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 77–91). US: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1990). An interactionist model of creative behavior. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24(4), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide, SA, 5095, Australia

    Kristina Dorniak-Wall

Authors
  1. Kristina Dorniak-Wall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Dorniak-Wall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DEI Department, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Giovanni Emanuele Corazza

  2. Marconi Institute for Creativity, Bologna, Italy

    Sergio Agnoli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dorniak-Wall, K. (2016). A Review of Integrated Approaches to the Study of Creativity: A Proposal for a Systems Framework for Creativity. In: Corazza, G., Agnoli, S. (eds) Multidisciplinary Contributions to the Science of Creative Thinking. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-618-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-617-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-618-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation