Skip to main content

Strategy in a World Where ‘Change has Changed’

  • Chapter
Foresight & Strategy in the Asia Pacific Region

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 809 Accesses

Abstract

Research strongly evidences that the majority of executives find that strategic thinking is their most significant work-related challenge and that in excess of 90 % of directors are not competent direction givers. Executives admit that they find strategic thinking an ‘agony’ while many subscribe to the evolutionary approach to strategy which discounts the value of strategy. Like it or not businesses now function in a world described by Stephen Hawking as “the age of complexity” and Ziauddin Sardar as “postnormal times”.

Probable futures are contrasted to possible futures within the context of complex systems and operational environments. Strategy, again, is seen as necessary yet difficult for leaders to ‘get right’ in navigating this complexity. A view that is shared by leading researchers of strategy acknowledges that strategy was heavily influenced by predictive models based mostly on quantitative empirical research. Stemming from when the past was quite useful in predicting the future, strategy literature rapidly evolved into a litany of theories and frameworks that sought to understand strategy as a science and to assist practitioners in formulating successful strategy.

Recent research reveals that when studying foresight in just under 500 Austrian industrial firms only 2.4 % have integrated foresight in their strategy development. This alarming, but evidenced situation is likely to be the case in most economies. Indeed Rohrbeck confirms that foresight activities that are not integrated into strategy systems are likely to have no impact on their host organizations. As such, there is an imperative to integrate foresight and strategic thinking as necessary antecedents of formulating strategic value. This is represented in the “strategy value chain” which suggests an end-to-end illustration of strategy.

The findings of a research study titled “Foresight and strategic thinking of strategy-level leaders” are presented. A theoretical model based on structural equation modelling (SEM) multivariate analysis is illustrated suggesting the conceptual relationship between foresight and strategic thinking of strategy-level leaders in the way they formulate strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bonn I (2001) Developing strategic thinking as a core competence. Manag Decis 39(1):63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabantous L, Gond J-P (2011) Rational decision making as performative praxis: explaining rationality’s eternel retour. Organ Sci 22(3):573–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter SM, Greer CR (2013) Strategic leadership: values, styles, and organizational performance. J Leadersh Org Stud 20:375–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham E (2009) A practical guide to structural equation modelling using Amos. Statsline, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • de Geus A (1997) The living company. Harv Bus Rev 75(2):51–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dian N (2009) Foresight styles assessment: a theory based study in competency and change. J Futures Stud 13(3):59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson PR, Farris PW, Verbeke WJ (2001) Dynamic strategic thinking. J Acad Mark Sci 29(3):216–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1996) Strategic leadership: top executives and their effects on organisations. West, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato VJ, Furey JT (2010) The theory of MindTime: the relationships between thinking perspective and time perspective. Personal Individ Differ 48(4):436–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt B (1995) Developing strategic thought: rediscovering the art of direction-giving, McGraw-Hill developing organizations series. McGraw-Hill, London/New York, xvii, 264

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary JE (2008) Evaluation of the Dian scales as a foresight measure, in school of global leadership and entrepeneurship. Regent University, Virginia Beach, p 118

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman EF (2007) Strategic thinking at the top. Sloan Manag Rev (Summer): 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Goll I, Rasheed AA (2005) Title the relationships between top management demographic characteristics, rational decision making, environmental munificence, and firm performance. Organ Stud 26(7):999–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick DC (2007) Upper echelons theory: an update. Acad Manage Rev 32(2):334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (2008) The future of management. Hum Resour Manag Int Dig 16(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G, Prahalad CK (1994) Competing for the future. Harv Bus Rev 72(4):122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammonds K (2001) Michael Porter’s big ideas. Fast Company. http://www.fastcompany.com/42485/michael-porters-big-ideas

  • Jarzabkowski P (2005) Strategy as practise. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • König M, Sedlatschek E, Wallner N (2014) Strategic foresight. Oder: Hic sunt dracones! CFO aktuell – Zeitschrift für Finance and Controlling 2014(4): 139–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtka JM (1998) Strategic thinking: can it be taught? Long Range Plann 31(1):120–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Major E, Asch D, Cordey-Hayes M (2005) Foresight as a core-competence. In: Slaughter RA, Inayatullah S, Ramos JM (eds) Knowledge base of futures studies. Foresight International, Indoorpilly, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Malan R (2010) The role of shared mental models of strategic thinking in the development of organisational strategy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland. http://www.eprints.usq.edu.au

  • Marcuse H (2013) One-dimensional man: studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadakis VM, Barwise P (2002) How much do CEOs and top managers matter in strategic decision‐making? Br J Manag 13(1):83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrinelli S (2002) Shaping context: the role and challenge for programmes. Int J Proj Manag 20(3):229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimond P (1996) Two styles of foresight: are we predicting the future or inventing it? Long Range Plann 29(2):208–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhorbeck R (2014) Only 2.4 percent of firms have integrated strategic foresight systems. Future Orientation

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe AJ, Boulgarides JD (1994) Managerial decision making: a guide to successful business decisions. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, xv, 253

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardar Z (2010) Welcome to postnormal times. Futures 42(5):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey J (1995) Title what next for strategic-level leadership research? Leadersh 1(1):89–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavakoli I, Lawton J (2005) Strategic thinking and knowledge management. In: Handbook of Business Strategy 6(1):155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Laan L (2010) Foresight competence and the strategic thinking of strategy-level leaders. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba. http://www.eprints.usq.edu.au

  • van der Laan L, Erwee R (2012) Foresight styles assessment: a valid and reliable measure of dimensions of foresight competence? Foresight 14(5):374–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Laan L, Erwee R (2013) In good hands? Foresight and strategic thinking capabilities of regional university leaders. In: Proceedings of the 36th Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia Conference (HERDSA 2013). Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), Auckland, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • White DW (1998) The impact of environmental uncertainty on strategy creation style in a franchise channel setting. J Strateg Mark 6(4):273–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington R (2001) What is strategy – and does it matter? 2nd edn. Thomson Learning, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Laan, L., Yap, J. (2016). Strategy in a World Where ‘Change has Changed’. In: Foresight & Strategy in the Asia Pacific Region. Management for Professionals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-597-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics