Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the associations of teacher support and teacher–student relationship with the academic engagement of 1469 Secondary 1 (Grade 7) students in Singapore. The students were identified as academically at risk based on the results of a national test given at the end of Primary 6 (Grade 6). Teacher autonomy and competence support, along with trust accorded to teachers, were found as significant positive predictors of the students’ academic engagement. In general, alienation of students from teachers and quality of students’ communication with teachers did not emerge as significant predictors of academic engagement. It was also found that, compared to the students in the high-risk group, the students in the low-risk group tended to be more engaged in class and perceived higher levels of trust and competence support from their teachers. There was no significant difference in the degree of teacher autonomy support that was reported by low-risk and high-risk students. However, teacher autonomy support was found to be the strongest predictor of academic engagement for the entire sample of at-risk students, as well as in separate analyses focusing on high- and low-risk students. Implications for future research and school practice are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). IBM SPSS Amos 21.0 user’s guide. Retrieved from ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/amos/21.0/en/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Amos_Users_Guide.pdf
Australian Council for Educational Research [ACER]. (2014). Progressive achievement test in reading. Retrieved from http://www.acer.edu.au/pat-reading
Biggs, J. (1994). Asian learners through Western eyes: An astigmatic paradox (Vol. 2, pp. 40–63). Adelaide, Australia: NCVER.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740–756.
Brewster, A. B., & Bowen, G. L. (2004). Teacher support and the school engagement of Latino middle and high school students at risk of school failure. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 21(1), 47–67.
Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York/London: Routledge.
Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Comprobando la equivalencia multigrupal de un instrumento de medida: pasos del proceso., 20(4), 872–882.
Cappella, E., & Weinstein, R. S. (2001). Turning around reading achievement: Predictors of high school students’ academic resilience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(4), 758–771.
Cemalcilar, Z. (2010). Schools as socialisation contexts: Understanding the impact of school climate factors on students’ sense of school belonging. Applied Psychology, 59(2), 243–272.
Chen, J. K., & Astor, R. A. (2011). Students’ personal traits, violence exposure, family factors, school dynamics and the perpetration of violence in Taiwanese elementary schools. Health Education Research, 26(1), 150–166.
Chen, J. J. L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
D’ Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 84–96.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4), 325.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.
Fogarty, G. (2007). Research on the progressive achievement tests and academic achievement in secondary schools. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Fok, A., & Watkins, D. A. (2007). Does a critical constructivist learning environment encourage a deeper approach to learning? The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 16, 1–10.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Alison, H. P. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148.
Goddard, R., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (2001). A multilevel examination of the distribution and effects of teacher trust in students and parents in urban elementary schools. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 3–17.
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-teacher relationships. In G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention and intervention. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Ho, J., & Crookall, D. (1995). Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions: Learner autonomy in English language teaching. System, 23(2), 235–243.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (Vol. 6). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hughes, J., & Kwok, O.-M. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers’ engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39–51.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. doi:10.1037/a0019682.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented South Korean adolescents? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661.
Kao, G. (2004). Parental influences on the educational outcomes of immigrant youth. The International Migration Review, 38(2), 427–449.
King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2014). Culture’s consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49, 175–198.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.
Kraft, M. A., & Dougherty, S. M. (2012). The effect of teacher-family communication on student engagement: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(3), 199–222.
Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (2009). Parent–child relationships during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 3–42). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lee, S. J. (2007). The relations between the student–teacher trust relationship and school success in the case of Korean middle schools. Educational Studies, 33(2), 209–216.
Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567–582.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (Eds.). (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action (Vol. 49). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Martin, A. (2008). How domain specific is motivation and engagement across school, sport, and music? A substantive–methodological synergy assessing young sportspeople and musicians. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 785–813.
Ministry of Education [MOE]. (2014). Secondary education. Singapore. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary/
Murphy, D. (1987). Offshore education: A Hong Kong perspective. Australian Universities Review, 30(2), 43–44.
Murray, C., & Zvoch, K. (2011). The inventory of teacher-student relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity among African American youth in low-income urban schools. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(4), 493–525.
Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323–367.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation & Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493.
Schneider, B., & Lee, Y. (1990). A model for academic success: The school and home environment of East Asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21(4), 358–377.
Short, L. (2013). Teachers’ and pupils’ views of teacher-pupil relationships through primary and middle school. Doctorate in Applied Educational Psychology, Newcastle University.
Skinner, E., & Belmont, M. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571–581.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765–781.
Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A test of self-determination theory in school physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 411–433.
Tan, J. P.-L. (2008). Closing the gap: A multiliteracies approach to English language teaching for ‘at-risk’ students in Singapore. In A. Healy (Ed.), Multiliteracies and diversity in education: New pedagogies for expanding landscapes (pp. 144–167). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
VanZile-Tamsen, C., & Livingston, J. A. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high- and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40(1), 54.
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39.
Watkins, D. A. (2010). Culture and learning. In D. M. McInerney & V. McInerney (Eds.), Educational psychology: Constructing learning (5th ed.). Frenchs Forrest, NSW: Pearson.
Watkins, D. A., McInerney, D. M., Lee, C., Akande, A., & Regmi, M. (2002). Motivation and learning strategies: A cross-cultural perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 329–343). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Waxman, H. C., Huang, S.-y. L., & Padron, Y. N. (1997). Motivation and learning environment differences between resilient and nonresilient Latino middle school students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 19, 137+.
Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70(4), 767–779.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250.
Yeh, S. S. (2010). Understanding and addressing the achievement gap through individualized instruction and formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 169–182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caleon, I.S., Tan, J.PL., Wui, M.G.L., Leen, C.C., King, R.B. (2016). Academically At-risk Adolescents in Singapore: The Importance of Teacher Support in Promoting Academic Engagement. In: King, R., Bernardo, A. (eds) The Psychology of Asian Learners. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-575-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-576-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)