Abstract
There is a recurrent paradox in the data of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA): within each participating country, there is a positive correlation between students’ learning motivation and achievement; when aggregating the data at country level, this correlation becomes negative. Using PISA data across 64 countries, we investigate the association of motivation and achievement within and between countries and attempt to explain the paradox with three measures indicative of culturally preferred scale usage: cultural response style, overclaiming, and anchoring vignettes. We confirmed the paradox and found that the three measures, in particular anchoring vignettes, could partially explain the negative association between motivation and achievement at country level. Our study is intellectually indebted to the tradition, initiated by David Watkins, to go beyond a simple classification of Chinese learners as focusing on rote memory learning. We illustrate how core Chinese values impinge on educational motivation and achievement and can help to explain seemingly paradoxical cross-cultural differences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernardo, A. I., & Ismail, R. (2010). Social perceptions of achieving students and achievement goals of students in Malaysia and the Philippines. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 385–407. doi:10.1007/s11218-010-9118-y.
Chen, C., Lee, S.-Y., & Stevenson, H.-W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x.
Chen, C., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Motivation and mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Asian-American, Caucasian-American, and East Asian high school students. Child Development, 66, 1215–1234. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.ep9509180284.
Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W. Y. (2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement: High school students in 41 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 579–592. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.007.
Chiu, M. M., & Zeng, X. (2008). Family and motivation effects on mathematics achievement: Analyses of students in 41 countries. Learning and Instruction, 18, 321–336. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.06.003.
d'Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning: A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 84–96. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.84.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138. doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.121.
Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766–794. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.766.
Hopkins, D. J., & King, G. (2010). Improving anchoring vignettes: Designing surveys to correct interpersonal incomparability. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 201–222. doi:10.1093/poq/nfq011.
King, G., Murray, C. J. L., Salomon, J. A., & Tandon, A. (2003). Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research. The American Political Science Review, 97, 567–583. doi:10.2307/3593024.
King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012a). Competitiveness is not that bad…at least in the East: Testing the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in the Asian setting. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 446–457. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.10.003.
King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012b). Studying for the sake of others: the role of social goals on academic engagement. Educational Psychology, 32, 749–776. doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.730479.
Lee, J. W., Jones, P. S., Mineyama, Y., & Zhang, X. E. (2002). Cultural differences in responses to a likert scale. Research in Nursing & Health, 25, 295–306. doi:10.1002/nur.10041.
Leung, K. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In F. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions-A comparative study of East Asia and the West (Vol. 9, pp. 21–46). New York: Springer.
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690.
Mizokawa, D. T., & Ryckman, D. B. (1990). Attributions of academic success and failure: A comparison of six Asian-American ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 434–451. doi:10.1177/0022022190214003.
OECD. (2009). Analyses with plausible values PISA data analysis manual: SPSS (2nd ed.). Paris: OECD publishing.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (forthcoming). PISA 2012 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response biases. In J. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17–59). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Paulhus, D. L., Harms, P. D., Bruce, M. N., & Lysy, D. C. (2003). The over-claiming technique: Measuring self-enhancement independent of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 890–904. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.890.
Rutkowski, L., Gonzalez, E., Joncas, M., & von Davier, M. (2010). International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and reporting. Educational Researcher, 39, 142–151. doi:10.3102/0013189x10363170.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Vevea, J. L. (2005). Pancultural self-enhancement reloaded: A meta-analytic reply to Heine (2005). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 539–551. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.539.
Uguroglu, M. E., & Walberg, H. J. (1979). Motivation and achievement: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 16, 375–389. doi:10.3102/00028312016004375.
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Watkins, D. (2006). Assessing similarity of meaning at the individual and country level: An investigation of a measure of independent and interdependent self. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 69–77. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.69.
Wang, J. H.-Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2.
Watkins, D. (1996). The influence of social desirability on learning process questionnaires: A neglected possibility? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 80–82. doi:10.1006/ceps.1996.0006.
Watkins, D. (2000). Learning and teaching: A cross-cultural perspective. School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 20, 161–173. doi:10.1080/13632430050011407.
Watkins, D. (2009). Motivation and competition in Hong Kong secondary schools: the students’ perspective. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 71–88). Hong Kong: Springer.
Watkins, D., & Cheung, S. (1995). Culture, gender, and response bias: An analysis of responses to the self-description questionnaire. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 490–504. doi:10.1177/0022022195265003.
Watkins, D., McInerney, D., Akande, A., & Lee, C. (2003). An Investigation of ethnic differences in the motivation and strategies for learning of students in desegregated South African schools. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 189–194. doi:10.1177/0022022102250563.
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2004). Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 331–346.
Xu, Y., Zhang, L., & Hee, P. (2014). Parenting practices and shyness in Chinese children. In H. Selin (Ed.), Parenting across cultures (Vol. 7, pp. 13–24). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Yu, J., & Murphy, K. R. (1993). Modesty bias in self-ratings of performance: A test of the cultural relativity hypothesis. Personnel Psychology, 46, 357–363.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
He, J., Van de Vijver, F.J.R. (2016). The Motivation-Achievement Paradox in International Educational Achievement Tests: Toward a Better Understanding. In: King, R., Bernardo, A. (eds) The Psychology of Asian Learners. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-575-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-576-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)