Abstract
This chapter starts by examining the vigorous debate that has surrounded the global issue of class size reduction (CSR) for so many years. It then charts a possible way ahead for class size research by arguing for a more substantial evidence base on how and why teaching and learning can differ in classes of different size in the under-researched context of the secondary school classroom. There then follows a definition of key terms and concepts in the class size literature. The issue of class size in East Asia is complicated by a host of cultural factors, and what is described as the Asian paradox. This paradox will be discussed with particular reference to the many international attainment tests which have been used erroneously in my opinion to suggest a positive link between large class sizes in Asia and students’ consistently high achievement levels when compared with their Western counterparts who often study in smaller classes. The chapter concludes with a description of the research aims of the book, an overview of the educational landscape for this study, and a comment on Hong Kong’s central position in current research on CSR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Achilles, C. A. (1999). Let’s put kids first, finally: Getting class size right. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Achilles, C. M. (2000). Should class size be a cornerstone for educational policy? The National Center on Education in the Inner Cities (CEIC) Review, 9(2), 15–23.
Allwright, R. L. (1984). The importance of interaction in classroom language learning. Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 156–171.
Anderson, L. (2000). Why should reduced class size lead to increased student achievement? In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), How small classes help teachers do their best (pp. 3–24). Philadelphia: Temple University Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
Anderson, L. W. (2002). Balancing breadth and depth of content coverage: Taking advantage of the opportunities provided by smaller classes. In J. D. Finn & M. C. Wang (Eds.), Taking small classes one step further (pp. 51–61). Greenwich: Information Age.
Annual Status of Education Report. (2013). India rural. New Delhi: Pratham.
Bain, H., & Achilles, C. M. (1986). Interesting developments on class size. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(9), 662–665.
Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best performing school systems come out on top. London: McKinsey & Company.
Bascia, N., & Faubert, B. (2012). Primary class size reduction: How policy space, physical space, and spatiality shape what happens in real schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11, 344–364.
Bateman, H. V. (2002). Students’ sense of community: Implications for class. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), Taking small classes one step further (pp. 63–75). Greenwich: Information Age.
Bennett, N. (1996). Class size in primary schools: Perceptions of head teachers, chairs of governors, teachers and parents. British Educational Research Journal, 22(1), 33–55.
Biddle, B. J., & Berliner, D. C. (2002). Small class size and its effects. Educational Leadership, 5(5), 12–23.
Blatchford, P. (2003). The class size debate: Is small better? Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Blatchford, P. (2011). The three generations of research on class size effects. In K. Harris, S. Graham, & S. Urdan (Eds.), The American Psychological Association (APA) educational psychology handbook. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Blatchford, P. (2015). The class sizes debate is tired and asks the wrong questions. Downloaded from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/13/class-size-debate-asks-wrong-question-simplistic
Blatchford, P., & Mortimore, P. (1994). The issue of class size in schools: What can we learn from research? Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 411–428.
Blatchford, P., & Lai, K. C. (2010). Class size: Arguments and evidence. In B. McGraw, E. Baker, & P. P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). New York: Elsevier.
Blatchford, P., Russell, P., & Brown, P. (2009). Teaching in large and small classes. In L. J. Saha & A. G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research (pp. 779–790). New York: Springer Science.
Blower, C. (2011). Downloaded from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8541457/Teachers-children-prioritised-in-school-admissions-overhaul.html
Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning UNESCO.
Bray, M. (2013). Benefits and tensions of shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the roles and impact of private supplementary tutoring in the lives of Hong Kong students. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(1), 18–30.
Brophy, J. (1992). Probing the subtleties of subject-matter teaching. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 4–8.
Cahen, L. S., Filby, N., McCutcheon, G., & Kyle, D. W. (1983). Class size and instruction. New York: Longman.
Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ re-interpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639–662.
Carless, D., & Harfitt, G. J. (2013). Innovation in secondary education: A case of curriculum reform in Hong Kong. In K. Hyland & L. Wong (Eds.), Innovation and change in English language education. London: Routledge.
Chan, C., & Rao, N. (Eds.). (2009). Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Chen, S. (1992). The problems and possible remedies in dealing with large classes. Teaching English in China, 24, 83–90.
Cooper, P., & McIntyre, D. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Teachers’ and pupils’ perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (2001). Large classes in China: ‘Good’ teachers and interaction. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: Central Electricity Regulatory Commission.
Department for Education. (2011, December). Class size and education in England evidence report. http://www.politics.co.uk/reference/class-sizes
Din, F. S. (1998). The benefits of teaching small classes perceived by Chinese urban school teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Education Research Association, Hilton Head.
Din, F. S. (1999). The benefits of teaching small classes – The Chinese perspectives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Education Research Association, Hilton Head.
Dong, B. (2001). A broad view of ‘small class education’. Shanghai Education, 8, 29–30. Available at http://www.sswxx.net/web/NewsDetail.aspx?NewsID=1964
Dong, B. (2013, June). Small Class Education in Mainland China. Practical difficulties and solutions. Presentation at Hong Kong Institute of Education (In Chinese).
Education and Manpower Bureau. (2003). LegCo panel on education: Study on effective strategies of class and group teaching in primary schools. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Ehrenberg, R. G., Brewer, D. J., Gamoran, A., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1–30.
Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1991). Students’ experience of the curriculum. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 465–485). New York: Macmillan.
Evertson, C. M., & Randolph, C. H. (1989). Teaching practices and class size: A new look at an old issue. Peabody Journal of Education, 67(1), 85–105.
Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: A statewide experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 557–577.
Finn, J. D., & Achilles, C. M. (1999). Tennessee’s class size study: Findings, implications, misconceptions. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 97–109.
Finn, J. D., & Wang, M. C. (2002). Taking small classes one step further. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing/Laboratory for Student Success.
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M., & Achilles, C. M. (2003). The “why’s” of class size: Student behaviour in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 21–368.
Flowerdew, L. (1998). A cultural perspective on group work. English Language Teaching Journal, 52(4), 323–329.
Flutter, J. (2007). Teacher development and pupil voice. The Curriculum Journal, 18(3), 343–354.
Galton, M. (1998). Class size: A critical comment on the research. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 809–818.
Galton, M., & Pell, T. (2009). Study on class teaching in primary schools in Hong Kong: Final report. Hong Kong: University of Cambridge and Education Bureau Hong Kong.
Galton, M., & Simon, B. (1980). Progress and performance in the primary classroom. London: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
Galton, M., Lai, K. C., & Chan, W. C. (2015). Learning to teach small classes: Lessons from East Asia. Oxon: Routledge.
Glass, G. V., & Smith, M. L. (1978). Meta-analysis of research on the relationship of class size and achievement. San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
Glass, G. V., Cahen, L., Smith, M. L., & Filby, N. (1982). School class size. Beverley Hills: Sage.
Goodnow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.
Gorard, S. (2012). Experiencing fairness at school: An international study in five countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 53(3), 127–137.
Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (1999). Hong Kong 1999. http://yearbook.gov.hk/1999/eng/appendices/app_33.htm
Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2011). Hong Kong: The facts. http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/population.pdf
Graue, E., & Rauscher, E. (2009). Researcher perspectives on class size reduction. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(9), 1–22.
Graue, E., Hatch, K., Rao, K., & Oen, D. (2007). The wisdom of class-size reduction. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 670–700.
Grissmer, D. (1999). Class size effects: Assessing the evidence, its policy implications, and future research agenda. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 231–248.
Handley, P. (2002). Every classroom teacher’s dream. Educational Leadership, 5(5), 33–35.
Hanushek, E. A. (1999). Some findings from an independent investigation of the Tennessee STAR experiment and from other investigations of class size effects. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 143–163.
Hanushek, E. A. (2002). Evidence, politics, and the class size debate. In L. Mishel & R. Rothstein (Eds.), The class size debate (pp. 37–67). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Harfitt, G. J. (2012a). An examination of teachers’ perceptions and practice when teaching large and reduced-size classes: Do teachers really teach them in the same way? Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(1), 132–140.
Harfitt, G. J. (2012b). Class size and language learning in Hong Kong: The students’ perspective. Educational Research, 54(3), 331–342.
Harfitt, G. J. (2013). Why ‘small’ can be better: An exploration of the relationships between class size and pedagogical practices. Research Papers in Education, 28(3), 330–346.
Harfitt, G. J. (2014). Brokering dialogue between secondary students and teachers to co-construct appropriate pedagogy in reduced-size classes. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 212–228.
Harfitt, G. J., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2015). An examination of class size reduction on teaching and learning processes: A theoretical perspective. British Educational Research Journal. doi:10.1002/berj.3165.
Hargreaves, L., Galton, M., & Pell, A. (1998). The effects of changes in class size on teacher-pupil interactions. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 779–795.
Hattie, J. (2005). The paradox of reducing class size and improving learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 387–425.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning, a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequence: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1994). Values survey module 1994 manual. Maastricht: The University of Limburg.
Hong Kong SAR Education Bureau: Small Class Teaching (2014a). Downloaded from: http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/edu-system/primary-secondary/applicable-to-primary/small-class-teaching/professional-support.html
Hong Kong SAR Education Bureau: Hong Kong. (2014b). Downloaded from: http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/about-edb/publications-stat/figures/sec.html
Hong Kong SAR, Curriculum Development Council. (2001). Learning to learn: The way forward in curriculum development: Consultation document summary. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Hong Kong SAR, Curriculum Development Council, & Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2007). Senior secondary curriculum guide. The future is now: From vision to realisation (secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Hong Kong SAR, Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life, reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. A. (1991). Foreign language classroom anxiety. In E. K. Horwitz & D. J. Young (Eds.), Language anxiety: From theory and research to classroom implications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Jenson, B., Hunter, A., Sonnermann, J., & Burns, T. (2012). Catching up: Learning from the best school systems in East Asia. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.
Jin, L., & Cortazzi, M. (1998). A dialogue: Large classes in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 29, 739–761.
Johnston, J. (1990). What are teachers’ perceptions of teaching in different classroom contexts? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Kennedy, K. (2011). Transformational issues in curriculum reform: Perspectives from Hong Kong. Journal of Textbook Research, 4, 87–113.
Kennedy, K., & Lee, J. (2010). The changing role of schools in Asian societies schools for the knowledge society. London: Routledge.
Lai, K. C. (2007, February 10). Understanding teacher change in small class teaching. Presentation at the international symposium on class size: Research, policy and practice, The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Hong Kong.
Lai, K. C., & Ip, K. (2007). Seeing large from small: Case studies of small class teaching. Hong Kong: Step Forward (In Chinese).
Lin, A. M. Y. (1999). Doing-English-lessons in the reproduction or transformation of social worlds? TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 393–412.
Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2011). Reticence and anxiety in oral English lessons: A case study in Mainland China. In L. Jin & M. Cortazzi (Eds.), Researching Chinese learners – Skills, perceptions, and intellectual adaptation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ministry of Education. (2009). www.moe.gov.my
Ministry of Education, PRC. (2013). National Educational Development Statistics Bulletin. Beijing: Ministry of Education, PRC.
Ministry of Education, Taiwan, (2014) downloaded http://english.moe.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15807&ctNode=11410&mp=1
Molnar, A., Smith, P., Zahorik, J., Palmer, A., Halbach, A., & Ehrle, K. (1999). Evaluating the SAGE program: A pilot program in targeted pupil-teacher reduction in Wisconsin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(2), 165–177.
Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey and Company.
Nanjing Education Bureau. (2007). Towards quality education: An exploration of teachers’ professional development in small class teaching. Nanjing: Nanjing Education Bureau (in Chinese).
Nelson, G. (1995). Cultural differences in learning styles. In J. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL Classroom. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
Obama, B. (2012). Presidential debate in Florida, 2012. Downloaded from: http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Barack_Obama_Education.htm
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011a). Education at a glance. Paris: OECD Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011b). Education at a glance, China. Paris: OECD Publications. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012a). How does class size vary around the world? (Education indicators in focus, no. 9). Paris: OECD Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012b, November). Education indicators in focus – 2012/09. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013a). Innovative learning environments, education, research and innovation. Paris: OECD Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013b). Education at a glance, Japan. Paris: OECD Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013c). Education at a glance, New Zealand. Paris: OECD Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013d). Australia in education at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-36-en
Pate-Bain, H., & Achilles, C. M. (1986). Interesting developments on class size. Phi Delta Kappa, 67(9), 662–665.
Pate-Bain, H., Achilles, C. M., Boyd-Zaharias, J., & McKenna, B. (1992). Class size makes a difference. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(3), 253–256.
Pedder, D. (2001). The impact of class size on effective teaching and learning: A conceptual and methodological investigation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Faculty of Education, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
Pedder, D. (2006). Are small classes better: Understanding relationships between class, classroom processes and pupils’ learning. Oxford Review of Education, 32(2), 213–234.
Rice, J. K. (1999). The impact of class size on instructional strategies and the use of time in High School mathematics and science courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2(2), 215–229.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2000). Teachers, schools, and achievement. Paper presented at Amherst College, University of Rochester, Amherst/Rochester.
Robinson, G. E., & Wittebols, J. H. (1986). Class size research: A related cluster analysis for decision making. Arlington: Educational Research Service.
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2000). Pupil participation and pupil perspective: Carving a new order of experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(1), 75–90.
Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school: Giving pupils a voice. London: Continuum.
Ruddock, J., Day, J., & Wallace, G. (1997). Students’ perspectives on school improvement’. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Rethinking educational change with heart and mind (The 1997 ASCD year book). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Ryan, J., & Louie, K. (2007). False dichotomy? ‘Western’ and ‘confucian’ concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 404–417.
Schleicher, A. (2015). Seven big myths about top-performing school systems. Downloaded from: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-31087545
Schoenhals, M. (1993). The paradox of power in a People’s Republic of China middle school. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
Shapson, S. M., Wright, E. N., Eason, G., & Fitzgerald, J. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 144–152.
Singapore, Ministry of Education. (2009). Teach less, learn more. Available http://www3.moe.edu.sg/bluesky/tllm.htm
Singapore Ministry of Education (2014) downloaded from: http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/secondary/
Slavin, R. E. (1989). Class size and student achievement: Small effects of small classes. Educational Psychologist, 24(1), 99–110.
Stasz, C., & Stecher, B. (2002). Before and after class-size reduction: A tale of two teachers. In M. C. Wang & J. D. Finn (Eds.), Taking small classes one step further (pp. 19–50). Greenwich: Information Age.
Stigler, J., & Stevenson, H. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools are failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York: Summit.
Taiwan, Ministry of Education. (2006). General guidelines of grades 1–9 curriculum of elementary and Junior High School Education. Taipei: Ministry of Education.
Ting-Toomey, S., & Kurogi, A. (1998). Facework competence in intercultural conflict: An updated face-negotiation theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(2), 187–225.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder: Westview Press.
Tsui, A. B. M. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. M. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, C. M. (1990). Prime Time: A reflection. Contemporary Education, 62(1), 36–37.
UNESCO. (2011). Secondary education regional information base: Country profile, Malaysia. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok.
Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (2001). The paradox of the Chinese learner and beyond. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner, psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 3–26). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Comparative Education Research Centre.
Wilson, V. (2002). Does small really make a difference? A review of the literature on the effects of class size on teaching practice and pupils’ behaviour and attainment. Edinburgh/Glasgow: Scottish Council for Research in Education (SCRE) Centre, University of Glasgow.
Wilson, V. (2006). Does small really make a difference? An update. A review of the literature on the effects of class size on teaching practice and pupils’ behaviour and attainment. Edinburgh/Glasgow: Scottish Council for Research in Education (SCRE) Centre, University of Glasgow.
Woessmann, L. (2006). Where to look for student sorting and class-size effects: Identification and quest for causes based on international evidence. In S. J. Howie & T. Plomp (Eds.), Contexts of learning mathematics and science: Lesson learned from TIMSS (pp. 353–368). New York: Routledge.
Woessmann, L., & West, M. R. (2006). Class-size effects in school systems around the world. European Economic Review, 50(3), 695–736.
Wong, N. Y., & Wong, W. Y. (2002). The ‘confucian heritage culture’ learner’s phenomenon. Asian Psychologist, 3(1), 78–82.
Word, E. R., Johnston, J., Bain, H. P., Fulton, B. D., Boyd-Zaharias, J., & Lintz, M. N. (1990). The State of tennessee’s student/teacher achievement ratio (STAR) project: Technical report 1985–90. Nashville: Tennessee State University.
Zhang, X., & Head, K. (2010). Dealing with learner reticence in the speaking class. English Language Teaching Journal, 64(1), 1–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harfitt, G.J. (2015). Class Size Reduction: A Global Debate. In: Class Size Reduction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-564-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-564-8_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-563-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-564-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)