Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Education Innovation Series ((EDIN))

  • 2109 Accesses

Abstract

An underpinning tenet of problem-based learning (PBL) is that solving ill-structured, real-world and authentic problems motivates students to engage in the learning process, leading to deeper and meaningful learning. Hence, designing problems is crucial to successfully implementing PBL. This chapter introduces readers to theories and empirical studies on designing PBL problems and provides a practical approach to designing real-world problems. Readers can also look at how they can evaluate the effectiveness of problems. Overall, this chapter will help the readers design and evaluate real-world problems for PBL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M. C., Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). In L. W. Anderson & D. R. Krathwohl (Eds.), A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, C. (2002). Teachers’ practical theories for the design and implementation of problem-based learning. Science Education International, 13(3), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., & Rumble, M. (2010). Draft white paper 1: Defining 21st century skills. Melbourne: ACTS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Feletti, G. (1991). The challenge of problem-based learning. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colliver, J. A. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine, 75(3), 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, M., Mpofu, D. J. S., Hasan, M. Y., & Stewart, T. S. (2002). Student perceptions of tutor skills in problem‐based learning tutorials. Medical Education, 36(3), 272–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Leng, B. A., Dolmans, D. H., Van de Wiel, M. W., Muijtjens, A. M. M., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (2007). How video cases should be used as authentic stimuli in problem‐based medical education. Medical Education, 41(2), 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Des Marchais, J. E. (1999). A Delphi technique to identify and evaluate criteria for construction of PBL problems. Medical Education, 33(7), 504–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans, D. H., Schmidt, H. G., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1994). The relationship between student-generated learning issues and self-study in problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 22(4), 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolmans, D. H., Snellen-Balendong, H., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (1997). Seven principles of effective case design for a problem-based curriculum. Medical Teacher, 19(3), 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errington, E. P. (2011). Mission possible: Using near-world scenarios to prepare graduates for the professions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijselaers, W. H., & Schmidt, H. G. (1990). Development and evaluation of a causal model of problem-based learning. In Z. H. Nooman, H. G. Schmidt, & E. S. Ezzat (Eds.), Innovation in medical education: An evaluation of its present status. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, B. O. B., & Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science, 25(2), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W. (2006). The 3C3R model: A conceptual framework for designing problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W. (2011). Theory to reality: A few issues in implementing problem-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(4), 529–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., & Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3, 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram, S. (2012). Training models for employment in the digital economy. Washington, DC: Results for Development Institute. Retrieved from http://r4d.org/sites/resultsfordevelopment.org/files/resources/R4D%20ICT%20Models%20Report_0.pdf

  • Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Phillips, W. R., Pinsky, L., Brock, D., Phillips, K., & Keary, J. (2006). A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: A review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Medical Education, 40(9), 867–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, M. M. (2007). In D. G. Oblinger (Ed.), Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Boulder: Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli3009.pdf

  • Maudsley, G. (1999). Roles and responsibilities of the problem based learning tutor in the undergraduate medical curriculum. British Medical Journal, 318(7184), 657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauffette, Y., Kandlbinder, P., & Soucisse, A. (2004). The problem in problem-based learning is the problems: But do they motivate students? In M. Savin-Baden & K. Wilkie (Eds.), Challenging research in problem-based learning (pp. 11–25). Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2003). A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of problem-based learning. On behalf of the Campbell Collaboration Systematic Review Group on the Effectiveness of Problem-based Learning. Newcastle upon Tyne: Learning and Teaching Support Network-01, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. The Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 35(5), 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17(1), 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. G., & Gijselaers, W. H. (1990, April 16–22). Causal modeling of problem-based learning. Paper presented at the Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Characteristics of problems for problem-based learning: The students’ perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sockalingam, N., & Schmidt, H. G. (2013). Does the extent of problem familiarity influence students’ learning in problem-based learning? Instructional Science, 41(5), 921–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sockalingam, N., Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2012). Assessing the quality of problems in problem-based learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soppe, M., Schmidt, H. G., & Bruysten, R. J. (2005). Influence of problem familiarity on learning in a problem-based course. Instructional Science, 33(3), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torp, L., & Sage, S. (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education (2nd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Berkel, H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 40(2), 231–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van den Hurk, M. M., Wolfhagen, I. H., Dolmans, D. H., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (1999). The impact of student‐generated learning issues on individual study time and academic achievement. Medical Education, 33(11), 808–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verkoeijen, P. P., Rikers, R. M., te Winkel, W. W., & van den Hurk, M. M. (2006). Do student-defined learning issues increase quality and quantity of individual study? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11(4), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychology process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., & Leary, H. (2009). A problem based learning meta-analysis: Differences across problem types, implementation types, disciplines, and assessment levels. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 12–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. A. (2005). Understanding by design. Philadelphia: ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nachamma Sockalingam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sockalingam, N. (2015). A Design Model for Problem-Based Learning. In: Cho, Y., Caleon, I., Kapur, M. (eds) Authentic Problem Solving and Learning in the 21st Century. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-521-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics