Abstract
Authentic learning research has focused on diverse topics and applied multiple perspectives including cognitive, affective, and sociocultural aspects. The chapters of this book present theoretical and practical issues in the authentic problem, practice, and participation approaches. We suggest that future research efforts focus on developing a robust theoretical framework, examining the effectiveness of authentic learning for the development of twenty-first century competencies, investigating transition from traditional pedagogy to authentic learning practices and exploring the novel research topics of authentic learning that were presented in the earlier chapters. Researchers, practitioners, and other stakeholders need to make collective efforts to improve authentic learning theory and practice and to resolve contradictions between the new practice and other elements of the current school system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J. R., Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11–13.
Barab, S. A., Squire, K. D., & Dueber, W. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37–62.
Bielaczyc, K., & Kapur, M. (2010). Playing epistemic games in science and mathematics classrooms. Educational Technology, 50(5), 19-25.
Bielaczyc, K., Kapur, M., & Collins, A. (2013). Building communities of learners. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, A. M. O’Donnell, C. Chan, & C. A. Chinn (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 233–249). New York: Routledge.
Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.
Cho, Y. H., & Huang, Y. (2014). Exploring the links between pre-service teachers’ beliefs and video-based reflection in wikis. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 39–53.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., den Bossche, P. V., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Goos, M. E., & Bennison, A. (2008). Developing a communal identity as beginning teachers of mathematics: Emergence of an online community of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 41–60.
Greeno, J. G. (1997). Response: On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.
Griffin, P., Care, E., Bui, M., & Zoanetti, N. (2013). Development of the assessment design and delivery of collaborative problem solving in the Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills project. In E. McKay (Ed.), ePedagogy in online learning: New developments in web-mediated human-computer interaction (pp. 55–73). Hershey: IGI Global.
Herrington, A., Herrington, J., Kervin, L., & Ferry, B. (2006). The design of an online community of practice for beginning teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 120–132.
Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments. New York: Routledge.
Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2013). Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(1), 63–65.
Kapur, M. (2013). Comparing learning from productive failure and vicarious failure. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.819000.
Kapur, M. (2014). Productive failure in learning math. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12107.
Kapur, M. (2015). The preparatory effects of problem solving versus problem posing on learning from instruction. Learning and Instruction, 39, 23–31.
Kapur, M., & Bielaczyc, K. (2012). Designing for productive failure. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), 45–83.
Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2009). The assistance dilemma in CSCL. In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O’Malley, D. Suthers, & P. Reimann (Eds.), Computer supported collaborative learning practices- CSCL2009 community events proceedings, Vol. 2 (pp. 37–42). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., & Kinzer, C. (2005). Problem solving as a complex, evolutionary activity: A methodological framework for analyzing problem-solving processes in a computer-supported collaborative environment. In T. W. Chan (Ed.), Proceedings of the Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) conference (pp. 252–261). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C., & Black, J. (2006). Insights into the emergence of convergence in group discussions. In S. Barab, K. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on the learning sciences (pp. 300–306). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Kapur, M., Hung, D., Jacobson, M., Voiklis, J., Kinzer, C., & Chen, D.-T. (2007). Emergence of learning in computer-supported, large-scale collective dynamics: A research agenda. In C. A. Clark, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference of computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 323–332). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, C. A., & Chong, W. H. (2010). Teacher collaborative learning through the lesson study: Identifying pathways for instructional success in a Singapore high school. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(4), 565–572.
Looi, C.-K., Seow, P., Zhang, B., So, H.-J., Chen, W., & Wong, L.-H. (2010). Leveraging mobile technology for sustainable seamless learning: A research agenda. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 154–169.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cho, Y.H., Caleon, I.S., Kapur, M. (2015). Authentic Learning Research and Practice: Issues, Challenges, and Future Directions. In: Cho, Y., Caleon, I., Kapur, M. (eds) Authentic Problem Solving and Learning in the 21st Century. Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-521-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-521-1_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-520-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-521-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)