Skip to main content

Sovereign, Déjà Vu! Unmasking the Resonating Structures in the Rwandan and Cambodian State-Making Genocides

  • Chapter
Discerning the Powers in Post-Colonial Africa and Asia
  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

A viable sociology of the powers should be able to account for the sociological linkages between the instituted objective structures and embedded subjective structures, for which the devil uses to induce massive systematic violence. This chapter aims to reimagine the unceasing interplays between these two structures as a structural resonance field. Genocide is a modern evil because it has been closely associated with the state-building project. I will outline an alternative historical sociology to illustrate how such evils as interethnic rivalry and inter-class jealousy contributed to the state-endorsed genocidal mobilizations in Africa and Asia. Genocide was made possible by the agents of darkness because they managed to instrumentalize the historically embedded cultural–spiritual specifics found in the structural resonance field of the concerned society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In social science, an actor refers to the person who carries out an action. For example, in the sentence ‘a chef cooks’, the chef is the actor while ‘cooks’ is the action that the actor carries out.

References

  • Abrams, Philip. 1982. Historical sociology. Somerset: Open Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, Ana Maria. 2005. Territorializing the nation and “Integrating the Indian”: “Mestizaje” in Mexican Official discourses and public culture. In Sovereign bodies: Citizens, migrants, and states in the postcolonial world, ed. T.B. Hansen and F. Stepputat. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 1989. Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkhof, Hendrik. 1962. Christ and the Powers. Trans. J.H. Yoder. Scottdale: Herald Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. In Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Joseph M. 1994. Evidence and explanation in history and sociology: Critical reflections on Goldthorpe’s critique of historical sociology. British Journal of Sociology 45(1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael. 1998. The extended case method. Sociological Theory 16(1): 4–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, Mary P. 2003. Making enemies: War and state building in Burma. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charon, J.M. 1998. Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an intervention, an integration, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Tony. 2002. Fluid iron: State formation in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swaan, Abram. 1988. In care of the state: Health care, education and welfare in Europe and the USA in the modern era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Mitchell. 2007. Governing societies: Political perspectives on domestic and international rule. Maidenhead: Open University Press with McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, Enrique. 2000. Europe, modernity, and eurocentrism. Nepantla: Views from South 1(3): 465–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, B. Peter, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol. 1985. Bringing the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1984. What is enlightenment? In The Foucault reader, ed. P. Rabinow. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1998. The Will to Knowledge. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1. Trans. R. Hurley. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1987. The nation-state and violence: Volume two of a contemporary critique of historical materialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Rene. 1986. The Scapegoat. Trans. Y. Freccero. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Rene. 2001. I see Satan fall like lightning. New York: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girard, Rene. 2005. Violence and the Sacred. Trans. P. Gregory. London/New York: Continuum

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, John H. 1991. The uses of history in sociology: Reflections on some recent tendencies. British Journal of Sociology 42(2): 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, John H. 1994. The uses of history in sociology: A reply. British Journal of Sociology 45(1): 55–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, John H. 2000. On sociology: Numbers, narratives, and the integration of research and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, John H. 2007. On sociology, second edition. Volume one: Critique and program. Ed. D. B. Grusky and P. England. Studies in social inequality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, Philip. 1998. We wish to inform you that tomorrow we will be killed with our families. New York: Farrar Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. Modernity: An incomplete project. In Postmodern culture, ed. H. Foster. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Thomas Blom. 2005. Sovereigns beyond the State: On legality and authority in urban India. In Sovereign bodies: Citizens, migrants, and states in the postcolonial world, ed. T.B. Hansen and F. Stepputat. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Thomas Blom, and Finn Stepputat. 2005. Introduction. In Sovereign bodies: Citizens, migrants, and states in the postcolonial world, ed. T.B. Hansen and F. Stepputat. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Thomas Blom, and Finn Stepputat. 2006. Sovereignty revisited. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Nicky. 1994. John Goldthorpe and the relics of sociology. British Journal of Sociology 45(1): 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, Alexander Laban. 2005. Why did they kill? Cambodia in the shadow of genocide. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, Bruce. 2011. The self illusion: Who do you think you are? London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1968. Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieh, George Klay Jr. 2006. The crises of the neo-colonial state and the Sierra Leonean civil war. African Strategic Review 1(1):47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, Ben. 2004. How Pol Pot came to power: Colonialism, nationalism, and communism in Cambodia, 1930–1975, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder, Derek. 1994. Understanding social theory. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1996. The Savage mind (La Pensee Sauvage). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locard, Henri. 2004. Pol Pot’s little red book: The sayings of Angkar, Foreword by David Chandler. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, Mahmood. 2001. When victims become killers: Colonialism, nativism, and the genocide in Rwanda. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Michael. 1994. In praise of macro-sociology: A reply to Goldthorpe. British Journal of Sociology 45(1): 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metaxas, Eric. 2010. Bonhoeffer: Pastor, martyr, prophet, spy. New York: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel S. 1988. Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel S. 2001. State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel S. 2004. Mental maps and virtual checkpoints: Struggles to construct and maintain state and social boundaries. In Boundaries and belonging: States and societies in the struggle to shape identities and local practices, ed. J.S. Migdal. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D. 2009. Dispensable and bare lives: Coloniality and the hidden political/economic agenda of modernity. Human Architecture: Journal of The Sociology of Self-Knowledge 7(2): 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D. 2010a. Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. In Globalization and the decolonial option, ed. W.D. Mignolo and A. Escobar. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D. 2010b. Introduction: Coloniality of Power and De-Colonial Thinking. In Globalization and the Decolonial Option, ed. W.D. Mignolo and A. Escobar. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D., and Michael Ennis. 2001. Coloniality at large: The western hemisphere in the colonial horizon of modernity. CR: The New Centennial Review 1(2): 19–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Barrington Jr. 1993[1966]. Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. With a new foreword by Edward Friedman and James C. Scott. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, Nicos P. 1994. In defence of ‘Grand’ historical sociology. British Journal of Sociology 45(1): 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pottier, Johan. 2002. Re-imagining Rwanda: Conflict, survival and disinformation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, Anibal. 2000. Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South 1(3): 533–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, Anibal. 2010. Coloniality and modernity/rationality. In Globalization and the decolonial option, ed. W. D. Mignolo and A. Escobar. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1921. Die Diktatur. Munich-Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 1999. Four articles, 1931–1938. Trans. S. Draghici. Washington, DC: Plutarch Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 2003[1950]. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum (Der Nomos der Erde im Völkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum). Trans. G.L. Ulmen. New York: Telos Press Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 2005. Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Trans. G. Schwab. London: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 2007. The Concept of the Political. Expanded Edition. With a Foreword by Tracy B. Strong and Notes by Leo Strauss. Transl. G. Schwab. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carl. 2008. Constitutional Theory (Verfassung-slehre). Trans. J. Seitzer. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed., The Yale Institution for Social and Policy Studies at Yale University (ISPS) series. London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, Philip. 2004. Pol Pot: The history of a nightmare. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, Theda (ed.). 1984. Vision and method in historical sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wink, Walter. 1992. Engaging the powers: Discernment and resistance in a world of domination. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Pak Nung. 2013. Post-colonial statecraft in South East Asia: Sovereignty, state building and the Chinese in the Philippines, Tauris Academic Studies. London/New York: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wong, P.N. (2016). Sovereign, Déjà Vu! Unmasking the Resonating Structures in the Rwandan and Cambodian State-Making Genocides. In: Discerning the Powers in Post-Colonial Africa and Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-511-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics