Skip to main content

Clarifying the Palm-Based Drilling Fluids Potentials

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICGSCE 2014

Abstract

With the goal of increasing awareness of toxicity level and environmental impact of drilling fluid, and for providing continuous findings for a better drilling fluid formulation, an experimental work based on a rheological evaluation of drilling fluid was carried out. The use of palm-based and palm oil-based as an alternative base component in drilling fluid formulation have been explored in terms of sand content, pH, viscosity, yield point and gel strength. Standard laboratory formulation including distilled water, sodium hydroxide, bentonite, barite and 1,2-propylene glycol were used in this study. Tests conducted on palm-based drilling fluid with properties of 17.0 ppg and 80/20 oil-water ratio revealed that palm methyl ester C14 and palm kernel oil have sand content of less than 0.5 % vol. with excellent thermal resistance on high temperature for palm kernel oil based.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Growcock F, Harvey T (2005) Drilling fluids processing handbook. Elsevier Inc., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ismail AR, Khor SF (2001) Feasibility study of palm oil esters as based fluid in drilling operation. In: Regional conference for young scientists, Skudai, Malaysia, pp 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke CJ, Veil JA (1995) Potential environmental benefits from regulatory consideration of synthetic drilling muds. In: Environmental assessment division. Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  4. Veil JA, Burke CJ, Moses DO (1995) Synthetic drilling fluids—a pollution prevention opportunity for the oil and gas industry. In: Annual conference and exposition of the water environment federation, Argonne National Laboratory, Illinois, Miami Beach, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  5. Salleh MK, von Tapavicza S (2005) Palm oil derived esters—an environmentally safe drilling fluid. Oil Palm Ind Econ J (5)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Corley RHV (2009) How much palm oil do we need? Environ Sci Policy 1:134–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Reijnders L, Huijbregts MAJ (2008) Palm oil and the emission of carbon-based greenhouse gases. J Clean Prod 16:477–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tapavicza SV (2005) Special report: vegetable esters make drilling fluids more environmentally friendly. In: Cognis Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Düsseldorf, Germany, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Bagoury M, Steele CD (2012) A new, alternative weight material for drilling fluids. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference and exhibition, San Diego, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. American Petroleum Institute (2009) Recommended practice for field testing water-based drilling fluids. In: ANSI/API recommended practice RP 13B-1, 4th edn. American Petroleum Institute

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmad S (2000) Non-food uses of palm oil and palm kernel oil. MPOPC Palm Oil Inf Ser. MPOB, Kuala Lumpur, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  12. American Petroleum Institute (1996) Recommended practice for drilling fluid processing systems evaluation. In: API recommended practice 13C, 2nd edn. American Petroleum Institute

    Google Scholar 

  13. Amani M, Al-Jubouri M, Shadravan A (2012) Comparative study of using oil-based mud versus water-based mud in HPHT fields. Adv Pet Explor Dev 4:18–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Azar JJ, Samuel GR (2007) Drilling engineering. PennWell Corporation, Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  15. Azizi A, Ibrahim MSN, Hamid KHK, Sauki A, Ghazali NA, Mohd TAT (2013) Agarwood waste as a new fluid loss control agent in water-based drilling fluid. Int J Sci Eng 5(2):101–105

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ismail AR (2001) Managing the environmental friendly drilling fluids in petroleum industries. In: The 2nd international conference on disaster management, Surabaya, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Amani M, Al-Jubouri M, Shadravan A (2012) Comparative study of using oil-based mud versus water-based mud in HPHT fields. Adv Pet Explor Dev 4(2):18–27

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.S.S. Committee (2005) Drilling fluid processing handbook. Gulf Professional Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Research Management Institute (RMI), Universiti Teknologi MARA for the Excellent Fund (600-RMI/ST/DANA 5/3/Dst (57/2009)) for funding the research project. Special grateful to the Ministry of Education, Malaysia (600-RMI/ERGS 5/3 (30/2013)) for providing financial support. The authors wish to thank the referee for making this a better paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hazlina Husin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Husin, H., Hassan, Z., Azizi, A., Mansor, M.F.A., Nasarauddin, R., Syed Ariffin, S.N. (2015). Clarifying the Palm-Based Drilling Fluids Potentials. In: Hashim, M. (eds) ICGSCE 2014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-505-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics