Skip to main content

Mercury Removal in Simulated Flue Gas by Oil Palm EFB Activated Carbon

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICGSCE 2014

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of simulated flue gas temperature and mercury inlet concentration on the mercury removal efficiency using activated carbon produced from oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) which is prepared using physical (steam) activation method. The elemental, proximate, porous structure and particle size were performed for the oil palm EFB activated carbon. At low temperature, performance of activated carbon showed a good potential for adsorption of mercury. However, as temperature increase from 90 to 180 °C, the efficiency of mercury was found to be decreased from 92 to 64 %. When the inlet mercury concentration was increased, the mercury removal efficiency is increased from 55 to 98 %. It was observed that mercury removal was favoured at lower temperature, such as 30 and 90 °C and higher mercury concentration, such as 0.192 ppm for virgin oil palm EFB activated carbon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Li P, Feng XB, Qiu GL, Shang LH, Li ZG (2009) Mercury pollution in Asia: A review of the contaminated sites. J Hazard Mater 168:591–601

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hutchison A, Atwood D, Santilliann-Jiminez QE (2008) The removal of mercury from water by open chain ligands containing multiple sulfurs. J Hazard Mater 156:458–465

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yao Y, Velpari V, Economy J (2014) Design of sulfur treated activated carbon fibers for gas phase elemental mercury removal. Fuel 116:560–565

    Google Scholar 

  4. De M, Azargohar R, Dalai AK, Shewchuk SR (2013) Mercury removal by bio-char based modified activated carbons. Fuel 103:570–578

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tan ZQ, Xiang J, Su S, Zeng HC, Zhou CS, Sun LS, Hu S, Qiu JR (2012) Enhanced capture of elemental mercury by bamboo-based sorbents. J Hazard Mater 239:160–166

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tongpoothorn W, Sriuttha M, Homchan P, Chanthai S, Ruangviriyachai C (2011) Preparation of activated carbon derived from Jatropha curcas fruit shell by simple thermo-chemical activation and characterization of their physico-chemical properties. Chem Eng Res Des 89:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  7. Muyibi SA, Kamaldin N, Gombak J (2008) Production Of activated carbon from oil palm empty fruit bunches for removal of zinc. In: Presented at the twelfth international water technology conference, IWTC12. Alexandria, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arami-Niya A, Wan Daud WMA, Mjalli FS, Abnisa F, Shafeeyan MS (2012) Production of microporous palm shell based activated carbon for methane adsorption: Modeling and optimization using response surface methodology. Chem Eng Res Des 90:776–784

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hidayu AR, Mohamad NF, Matali S, Sharifah ASAK (2013) Characterization of activated carbon prepared from oil palm empty fruit bunch using BET and FT-IR techniques. Proc Eng 68:379–384

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hidayu AR, Mohamad NF, Matali S, Sharifah ASAK (2014) Preparation and characterization of activated carbon made from oil palm empty fruit bunch. Key Eng Mater 594-595:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shen Z, Ma J, Mei Z, Zhang J (2010) Metal chlorides loaded on activated carbon to capture elemental mercury. J Environ Sci 22:1814–1819

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeng H, Jin F, Guo J (2004) Removal of elemental mercury from coal combustion flue gas by chlorideimpregnated activated carbon. Fuel 83:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  13. US Environmental Protection Agency (2008) In: Adsorption, control of gaseous emissions (Chapter 4)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takaoka M, Takeda N, Fujiwara T (2002) Control of mercury emissions from a municipal solid waste incinerator in Japan. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 52:931–940

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carey TR, Hargrove OW, Richardson CF, Chang R, Meserole FB (1998) Factors Affecting Mercury Control in Utility Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 48:1166-1174

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ping F, Chao-ping C, Zi jun T (2012) Experimental study on the oxidative absorption of Hg0 by KMnO4 solution. Chem Eng J 198–199:95-102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by the Research Management Institution (RMI) through Excellence Fund (600-RMI/DANA 5/3/RIF (311/2012)) and UiTM Shah Alam. The authors also thanks to Prof. Masaki Takaoka for his contribution in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noor Hidayu Abdul Rani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdul Rani, N.H., Mohamad, N.F., Matali, S., Syed A. Kadir, S.A. (2015). Mercury Removal in Simulated Flue Gas by Oil Palm EFB Activated Carbon. In: Hashim, M. (eds) ICGSCE 2014. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-505-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics