Abstract
This chapter describes a UK school English department’s successful but short-lived attempts in the 1980s to develop more linguistically and culturally inclusive forms of curricula and assessment working in collaboration with like-minded public examination boards. Referencing Basil Bernstein’s distinction between performative approaches to curriculum, assessment and pedagogy, which privilege ‘absences’, and competence approaches, which privilege ‘presences’, the department’s initiative is illustrated via an account of how one student’s non-standard use of English was able to be accommodated within formal examination systems in a way that valued his creativity and critical insights rather than punishing him for his lack of expertise in standard forms of expression. The account is contextualised within education movements and debates of the time, including the development of creative responses to literature study and the challenging of an existing literary ‘canon’, as well as within current central education policy in England which, it is suggested, promotes the return of ‘traditional’, performative, and fundamentally ex-clusive approaches to curriculum, pedagogy and assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernstein, B. (1971a). Class, codes and control. (Vol. 1). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Bernstein, B. (1971b). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. F. D. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and Control (pp. 47–69). London: Collier-Macmillan.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bullock, A. (1975). A language for life (“The Bullock Report”). London: HMSO
Central Advisory Council for Education. (1967). Children and their primary schools (“The Plowden Report”). London: HMSO.
Coard, B. (1971). How the West Indian child is made educationally sub-normal in the British school system. London: New Beacon.
Elwood, J. (2001). Examination techniques: issues of validity and effect on pupils’ performance. In D. Scott (Ed.), Curriculum and assessment (pp. 83–103). Westport Connecticut and London: Ablex Publishing.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Freire, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousness. London: Sheed and Ward.
Labov, W. (1972). The logic of non-Standard English. In P. P. Giglioli (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 179–215). Harmondsworth: Penguin
Moore, A. (1999). Teaching multicultured students: Culturism and anti-culturism in school classrooms. London: Falmer Press.
Moore, A. (2005). Culture, knowledge and inclusion. What place for pluralism in the common curriculum? In D. Halpin & P. Walsh (Eds.), Educational commonplaces (pp. 85–101). London: Institute of Education.
Moore, A. (2006). Curriculum as culture: Entitlement, bias and the Bourdieusian arbitrary. In A. Moore (Ed.), Schooling, society and curriculum (pp. 87–99). London: Taylor and Francis.
Rossiter, A. (2011). Unsettled social work: The challenge of Levinas’s ethics. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 980–995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moore, A. (2015). English Literature at Brondesbury and Kilburn High School (UK 1980–1984). In: Rodríguez, E. (eds) Pedagogies and Curriculums to (Re)imagine Public Education. Cultural Studies and Transdisciplinarity in Education, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-490-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-490-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-489-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-490-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)