Abstract
Current science curriculum emphasizes the knowledge, skills, and epistemic practices of science. Scientific practices usually involve asking questions, developing models, investigating, constructing explanations, and negotiating meanings. Students are not only expected to acquire more relevant science knowledge, but also to develop the ability to think and reason about phenomena and, furthermore, to take actions and solve problems. However, science teachers utilizing published textbooks and focusing on coverage and neglecting the epistemic practices aspect of science curriculum would restrain the enactment of reformed curriculum. This chapter draws on the paradigm of understanding curriculum and gives examples to illustrate to what extent Taiwanese science teachers enhance their understandings of curriculum, teaching, and learning in science through designing science curriculum modules. We also compare and contrast the approaches of designing professional developing programs in literature and those emerging from the case teachers’ design experiences. Furthermore, we illustrate how teachers’ knowledge about curriculum, teaching, and learning in science interacted with each other and mediated teachers’ learning process. This chapter helps readers understand the trend of curriculum reform in Taiwan, as well as ways science teachers learn under the reform context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chang, J. Y. (2001). The design of multi-situated teaching modules: An example using the topic of carbon dioxide. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 9(3), 235–252.
Chang, C. Y., & Lai, L. C. (2001). Does it work? A study on the earth-system integrated instructional module. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 323–350.
Chang, H. P., Guo, C. J., Chang, W. H., & Lin, J. S. (2002). The cognition and attitudes of inservice teachers toward the nine-year integrated science curriculum. Paper presented at the 2002 NARST Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LO, U.S.A.
Chen, J. Y., Chang, H. P., & Guo, C. J. (2008). Junior high students’ perspectives on grade 1–9 curriculum: Investigating students’ experiences and attitudes toward science class. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 16(5), 495–514.
Chen, Y. C., Tseng, C. M., & Chang, W. H. (2010). The role of the teacher in engaging elementary school students in argumentation utilizing the science writing heuristic: Four year case studies. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 18(5), 417–442.
Chiou, H. J., Lien, C. J., & Lien, I. B. (2003). Factor analysis of middle grades science and technology curriculum materials. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 431–455.
Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., & Dijkstra, S. (2008). Assessing teachers’ beliefs to facilitate the transition to a new chemistry curriculum: What do the teachers want? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(4), 317–335.
Guo, C. J., Chiang, W. H., & Chang, W. H. (1997). An action research study of the development of an in-service teacher education program for high school science and mathematics teachers- Teachers’ change and curriculum adjustment. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 5(3), 295–320.
Hsiung, T. H., Wang, Z. H., & Chen, S. L. (2001). A study of integrated curriculum models: Using science as the core course. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 9(2), 123–145.
Hsu, S. J., & Hsu, C. F. (2012). The effects of a one-day environmental education program on sixth graders’ environmental literacy at Chih-Nan Nature Center. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 69–94.
Hung, J. F., & Chen, Y. K. (2011). The design and enactment of an emerging technology inquiry-based curriculum in senior high school: A case study. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 1–23.
Kao, H. L. (2006). Development and evaluation of instructional modules to promote students’ performance on the capability indexes of the nature of science for the nine-year curriculum. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 401–425.
Lin, M. Y., Chung, W. L., Chang, Y. H., Lee, C. D., & Chen, Y. Y. (2013). High school teachers’ development process in a professional learning community of the innovative science curriculum. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 75–96.
Loucks-Horsley, S., & Stiles, K. E. (2001). Professional development designed to change science teaching and learning. In: J. Rhoton & P. Bowers (Eds.), Professional development: Planning and design. Arlington: NSTA.
Lu, C. C., & Huang, L. Y. (2007). A study of conceptual change teaching activities for the lesson of cell curriculum in junior high school. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 295–316.
Ministry of Education. (2008a). General guidelines of grade 1–9 curriculum. Taipei: MOE.
Ministry of Education. (2008b). Guidelines of grade 1–9 science curriculum. Taipei: MOE.
Sun, Y. S. (2000). Validation of a rubric on junior high school biology teachers’ classroom teaching performance. Changhua, Taiwan: National Changhua University of Education (Unpublished Master thesis).
Tseng, K. H., & Chen, Y. (2005). Teachers and students’ understanding, learning needs, and willingness to integrate advanced nanotechnology into elementary school curricula. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 13(1), 101–120.
Tseng, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. S. (2006). The impact of an online course on eleventh grader students’ conceptual development about seasons. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 14(3), 257–282.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Su, MC., Tsai, CM., Chang, HC., Chang, WH., Lin, CY. (2016). Design to Understand Curriculum: Epistemic Practices, Teaching, and Learning in Science. In: Chiu, MH. (eds) Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-472-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-471-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-472-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)