Skip to main content

A Study on Syariah Whipping as Punishment for Drug Dependents in Malaysia

  • Conference paper
Islamic perspectives relating to business, arts, culture and communication

Abstract

The government has introduced various programmes to rehabilitate and give treatment to drug dependent. However, statistic from Agensi Anti Dadah Kebangsaan (AADK) has shown that a number of drug dependents have increased annually. It is high time for the government to review and enhance the punishment for drug dependents. The Drug Dependants (Treatment and Rehabilitation) Act 1983 is silent on imposing punishment on a first offender. Therefore, this paper will examine on imposing whipping as punishment for drug dependent as provided by Syariah law. Adopting the application of qiyas, the rule and punishment of drinking liquor which is stated in the Qur’an (5:90) and the hadith is extended to consuming drugs. This paper seeks to discuss alternative methods to deter the public from drug abuse and at the same time to decrease the government expenditure in providing rehabilitation programmes and services for drug dependents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Zulkifli, A. H. (2006). Punishment Under Islamic Law and Common Law: A comparative Study. Johor: Perniagaan Jahabersa [1].

  2. 2.

    Hosein, I. (2008). The Qur’an, Crime and a Philosophy of Punishment. Retrieved 1 29, 2014, from Understanding Islam: http://www.imranhosein.org/articles [2].

  3. 3.

    El-Awa, M. S. (1982). Punishment In Islamic Law: A Comparative Study. Indiapolis: American Trust Publications [4].

  4. 4.

    Ibid pg. 13.

  5. 5.

    Kamaruddin, A. R. (2007). The Misuse Of Drugs In Malaysia: Past and Present. Jurnal Anti Dadah Malaysia, 1–24 [5].

  6. 6.

    A. Nadelmaan, E. (2014). Drug Prohibition in the United States: costs, consequences and Altenative. Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 783–808 [8].

  7. 7.

    Hasan, A. (1983). Modes of Reasoning in Legal Cause (Ijtihas Fi’I-“illah). Islamic Studies, 76–12 [10].

  8. 8.

    Al-Salami, M. A.-M. (1999). Al-Qiyas (Analogy) and Its Modern Application. Eminent Scholars Lecture Series, 11 [11].

  9. 9.

    Rahman, A. (1999). Non-Muslims Under Shariah (Islamic Law). Kuala Lumpur: A.S Nordeen [12].

  10. 10.

    Kamali, M. H. (2001). Issues in Legal Theory and Prospect For Reform. Islamic Studies, 5–23.

  11. 11.

    Ibid pg. 7 [14].

  12. 12.

    Moghul, U. F. (1999). Approximating Certainty in Ratiocination: How To Ascertain The Illah in the Islamic Legal System and How to Determine the Ratio Decidendi in the Anglo-American Common Law. Islamic Law Journal, 125–150 [15].

  13. 13.

    Malaysia, J. K. (1970, 1 1). Pengertian Ahli al Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Retrieved 1 1, 26, from e-fatwa: http://www.e-fatwa.gov.my/fatwa [16].

  14. 14.

    Moghul pg. 130.

  15. 15.

    Idris, A. G. (1997). Himpunan hadith Sahih Mengenai hukuman Hudud. Kuala Lumpur: Al-Hidayah Publishers [17].

  16. 16.

    Al-Ewa pg. 30.

  17. 17.

    Anwarullah. (2002). The Criminal Law of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: As Nordeen [18].

  18. 18.

    Al-Ewa pg. 30.

  19. 19.

    Jamal Ali, S. H. (2009). Kos Ekonomi Penyalahgunaan Dadah. Jurnal Anti Ddah Malaysia, 1–14 [19].

  20. 20.

    Kamaruddin pg. 15.

  21. 21.

    The Siberian Times, 2013.

  22. 22.

    Ibid, 2013.

References

  1. Zulkifli, A. H. (2006). Punishment under Islamic law and common law: A comparative study. Johor: Perniagaan Jahabersa.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hosein, I. (2008). The Qur’an, crime and a philosophy of punishment. Retrieved January 29, 2014, from understanding Islam: http://www.imranhosein.org/articles

  3. Bagaric, R. E. (2000). Australian sentencing principle and practice. Sydney: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. El-Awa, M. S. (1982). Punishment in Islamic law: A comparative study. Indianapolis: American Trust Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kamaruddin, A. R. (2007). The misuse of drugs in Malaysia: Past and present. Jurnal Anti Dadah Malaysia, 1, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Majid, M. K. (1999). Criminal procedure in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Respondant. (2014, 2 13). Agensi Anti Dadah Kebangsaan. (I. R. Yuhanza, Interviewer)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nadelmaan, E. A. (2014). Drug prohibition in the United States: Costs, consequences and alternative. Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 783–808.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mohd Sukki Othman, M. H. (2008). Mengapa Perlu Kepada Undang-Undang Jenayah Islam? Kuala Lumpur: Pustaka Yamien Sdn Bhd.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hasan, A. (1983). Modes of reasoning in legal cause (Ijtihas Fi’I-“illah). Islamic Studies, 22, 76–125.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Salami, M. A.-M. (1999). Al-Qiyas (Analogy) and its modern application (Eminent scholars lecture series, 11). U.K.: Edward Edgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rahman, A. (1999). Non-Muslims under Shariah (Islamic law). Kuala Lumpur: A.S Nordeen.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kamali, M. H. (1999). Al Qiyas (Analogy) and its modern applications (Eminent scholars lecture series, 32). U.K.: Edward Edgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kamali, M. H. (2001). Issues in legal theory and prospect for reform. Islamic Studies, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moghul, U. F. (1999). Approximating certainty in ratiocination: How to ascertain the Illah in the Islamic legal system and how to determine the ratio decidendi in the Anglo-American Common Law. Islamic Law Journal, 4, 125–150.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malaysia, J. K. (1970, 1 1). Pengertian Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Retrieved 1 1, 26, from e-fatwa: http://www.e-fatwa.gov.my/fatwa-pengertian-ahli-al-sunnah-wal-jamaah

  17. Idris, A. G. (1997). Himpunan hadith Sahih Mengenai hukuman Hudud. Kuala Lumpur: Al-Hidayah Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anwarullah, A. (2002). The criminal law of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: As Nordeen.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jamal Ali, S. H. (2009). Kos Ekonomi Penyalahgunaan Dadah. Jurnal Anti Ddah Malaysia, 2, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Safian, Y. H. (2013). An analysis on Islamic rules on drugs. International Journal of Education and Research, 4, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kebangsaan, A. A. (2012). Buku Maklumat Ddah. Kuala Lumpur: Agency Anti Dadah Kebangsaan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper is a work in progress under the Exploratory Research Grant Scheme from the Ministry of Higher Education entitled ‘Exploring the Deterrent Effect of Death Penalty on Drug Trafficking’. We wish to express our gratitude to the Ministry of Education for awarding the grant and to UiTM for the co-operation given.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhanza Binti Othman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Othman, Y.B., Mahat, I.R.B., Joni, E.K.E. (2015). A Study on Syariah Whipping as Punishment for Drug Dependents in Malaysia. In: Omar, R., Bahrom, H., de Mello, G. (eds) Islamic perspectives relating to business, arts, culture and communication. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-429-0_43

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics