Abstract
The theory of neuropolitics emerged from that of neuroscience or brain science. In linking this theory to politics, the fundamental study was undertaken to provide insights on the factors for non-apologetic behavior among politicians. During public debates, it is the politician’s responsibility to ensure factual accuracies to avoid controversies and backlashes. The implications of inaccuracies would affect the faith and image of the politician in the eyes of the constituent that they represent. As a public figure, any unwarranted actions are food for the paparazzi, and news travel fast aided by information and communication technologies. Saying sorry in public is not a strong forte of most politicians but failure to apologize will also result in suffrage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hayden, B. Y. (2011). Does brain size predict who you vote for? Psychology Today, 2011.
Hashim, R., Badaruddin, S., Mazuki, M. A., Sharif, N., Ismail, N. M., & Ismail, A. I. (2012). Neuropolitics and political non-apology: A proposed variable framework (Vol. 2012, pp. 363–366). Proceedings of the IEEE business engineering and industrial applications colloquium (BEIAC).
Granger, J. D. (2005). Neuropolitics: Thinking, culture, speed – Out of bounds. Book Review: Anthropological Theory, 5, 583.
Connolly, W. (2005). Neuropolitics: Thinking, culture, speed – Out of bounds. Anthropological Theory, 5, 583–591.
Ariffin, Z. (2011, September 3). All it takes is a sincere apology. New Straits Times.
Carvalho, M., Azhar, S., & Wong, P. M. (2011, September 19). DAP rep’s ‘change Jalur Gemilang’ suggestion shows lack of respect, says DPM, The Star.
Cunningham, M. (2002). Saying sorry: The politics of apology. The Political Quarterly, 70, 285–293.
Dodds, G. G. (2003). Political apologies: Chronological list.
Feaver, P. (2011, June 3) The perils of political apology. Shadow Government.
Goolpacy, P.F. (2011). The perfect “political apology” is anything but. Perfect Apology.
Boyd, S. (2007). Crafting a better political apology: Why politicians apologize badly, and how they should improve. (Are you paying attention, David Vitter?
Harris, S., Grainger, K., & Mulanny, L. (2006). The pragmatics of political apologies. Discourse and Society, 17, 715–737.
Eisinger, R. M. (2011). The political non-apology. Journal of Social Science and Public Policy, 48, 136–141.
Harrel, J., Ware, B. L., & Linkugel, W. A. (1975). Failure of apology in American politics: Nixon and Watergate. Communication Monographs, 42, 245–261.
Hastie, B. (2009). Excusing the inexcusable: Justifying injustice in Nelson’s sorry speech. Discourse and Society, 20, 705–725.
Kampf, Z. (2009). Public (non apologies): The discourse of minimizing responsibility. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2257–2270.
Olson, G. (2009). Toward a Neuropolitics of empathy. Proceedings of the Midwestern political Science Association Conference and Annual Meeting 2009, pp. 1–44.
Kato, J., Ide, H., Kabashima, I., Kadota, H., Takano, K., & Kansaku, K. (2009). Neural correlates of attitude change following positive and negative advertisements. Frontiers of Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 1–13.
Gunnel, J. G. (2008). Are we losing our minds? Cognitive science and the study of politics. Political Theory, 35, 704–731.
Vecchiato, G., Toppi, J., Cincotti, F., Astolfi, L., De Vico Fallani, F., Aloise, F., et al. (2010). Neuropolitics: EEG spectral maps related to a political vote based on the first impression of the candidate's face. 32nd annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Solomos, J. (2009). The politics of official apologies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, 1498–1499.
Kimoga, J. (2010). Remorseless apology: Analysing a political letter. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2181–2188.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: Design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Acknowledgment
The researchers would like to thank the politicians for spending the time to be interviewed. As the research area was rather sensitive, we have to maintain the confidentiality of the interviews and the respondents. We are also grateful to two political analysts who provided us with valuable feedbacks on similar matter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hashim, R., Mazuki, M.A., Ismail, M.F. (2015). Linking Neuropolitics to the Politics of Reconciliation in Relation to Political Non-Apology: A Case of Malaysia. In: Omar, R., Bahrom, H., de Mello, G. (eds) Islamic perspectives relating to business, arts, culture and communication. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-429-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-429-0_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-428-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-429-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)