Skip to main content
  • 2429 Accesses

Abstract

Almost every first mile journey starts with walking, and the last mile journey ends by the same form of transport. Various factors have been identified as having influence on the willingness of pedestrian rail commuters to walk from home to the nearby rail transit station. This pilot study was carried out in three rail commuter stations within the selected Transit Planning Zone of the Kuala Lumpur Conurbation. The main purpose of the study is to evaluate the pedestrian commuters’ perception of their environmental factors to and from the rail transit stations. The proposed framework was evaluated by using a structured questionnaire and survey done on 50 respondents. The findings indicate that physical environment, weather, safety, and rail level of service have positive correlation with walkability. The findings may enhance the actual survey to be carried out, while the final results may provide further insights into walkability and then on increasing the rail patronage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kuala Lumpur City Hall (2003) Draft structure plan Kuala Lumpur 2020. Kuala Lumpur City Hall, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  2. Land Public Transport Commission (2011) Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley Public Transport Master Plan, SPAD

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuala Lumpur City Hall, Kuala Lumpur Structure Plan 2020, Kuala Lumpur. Kuala Lumpur City Hall, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kamba AN, Rahmat RAOK, Ismail A (2007) Why do people use their cars: a case study in Malaysia. J Soc Sci 3:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brons M, Givoni M, Rietveld P (2009) Access to railway stations and its potential in increasing rail use. J Transp Res A 43(2):136–149

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamid NA (2009) Parking demand analysis and user behaviour modelling of park and ride scheme in Kuala Lumpur Conurbation. Thesis, University of Malaya

    Google Scholar 

  7. Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) Walking improvements – strategies to make walking convenient, safe and pleasant. TDM Encyclopedia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Todd L (2011) Economic value of walkability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, TDM Encyclopedia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Leslie E, Coffee N, Frank L, Owen N, Bauman A, Hugo G (2007) Walkability of local communities: using geographical information system to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes. J Health Place 13:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pikora T, Corti BG, Bull F, Jamrozik K, Donovan R (2003) Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Soc Sci Med 56:1693–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sealens B, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and Cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literature. Ann Behav Med 25(2):80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerin E, Sealen BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2006) Neighbourhood environment walkability scale: validity and development of a short form. Am Coll Sport Med: 1682–1691

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tucker P, Gilliland J (2007) The effect of season and weather on physical activity: a systematic review. J R Ins Public Health 121:909–922

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bahari NA, Arshad AK, Yahya Z (2013) Assessing the pedestrians’ perception of the sidewalk facilities based on pedestrian travel purpose. In: IEEE 9th international colloquium on signal processing and its application

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alfonzo MA (2005) To walk or not to walk? The hierarchy of walking needs. J Environ Behav 37(6):808–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Anna LS (2005) Is it safe to walk? Neighbourhood safety and security considerations and their effects on walking. J Plan Lit 20:219–232

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pauley N, Balcombe R, Mackett R, Titheridge H, Preston J, Wardman M, Shires J, White P (2006) The demand for public transport: the effect of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership. J Transp Policy 13:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kingham S, Dickinson J, Copsey S (2001) Travelling to work: will people move out of their cars. J Transp Policy 8:151–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Maghelal PK (2007) Healthy transportation – healthy communities: developing objective measures of built-environment using GIS and testing significance of pedestrian variables on walking to transit. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sekaran U, Bougie R (2009) Research methods for business. A skill building approach. Wiley, Haddington

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pallant J (2010) SPSS survival manual. McGraw-Hill Education, New York, p 134

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilson CR, Voorhis V, Morgan BL (2007) Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample size. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 3(2):43–50

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fain JA (2010) Should we publish pilot/feasibility studies? J Diabetes Educ 36(4):521

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia and the Research Management Institute (RMI) of Universiti Teknologi MARA for the financial support granted through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) [600-RMI/FRGS 5/3 (99/2013)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Mokhlas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mokhlas, H., Hamid, N.A., Mustafa, M., Sham, R. (2016). Measuring Walkability Attributes of Pedestrian Rail Commuter: A Pilot Study. In: Pyeman, J., Wan Rashid, W., Hanif, A., Syed Mohamad, S., Tan, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st AAGBS International Conference on Business Management 2014 (AiCoBM 2014). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-426-9_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics