Skip to main content

The Determinants of Technological Innovation Adoption in Malaysian SMEs

  • Conference paper
  • 2461 Accesses

Abstract

This study used the partial least squares (PLS) and structural equation modeling (SEM) tool to explore the factors to determine the adoption of technological innovation (TI) in the manufacture sector in Malaysian SMEs’ businesses. Statistical results confirm that the adoption of technology is positively associated with its size. It also examines on the best predictor pertaining to the TI adoption. The results, besides indicating the suitability of the PLS in statically analysis, have also contributed to a better understanding of technological innovation adoption in Malaysian SMEs’ business perspectives, and the findings are useful for policy makers and practitioners to enhance their application given the diversified advance to the small business.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Based on PICS (2007) data, Malaysia’s investment climate is benchmarked with the following East Asian countries such as China (2003), Indonesia (2003), the People’s Republic of Korea (2005), the Philippines (2003), Thailand (2006), and Vietnam (2005) and some higher middle-income countries such as Turkey (2005), Brazil (2003), and Mexico (2006).

  2. 2.

    Cleaning data whereby only useful data are maintained in the analysis. For those respondent that did not indicated the firm size in the questionnaire will be executed from the data set.

  3. 3.

    This variable is unique because it is only applied in Malaysia. Firm status establishment refers to firm establishment either Bumiputera or non-Bumiputera. According to Bumiputera-controlled companies (BCCs), 50 % of the equity is owned by Bumiputera shareholder or at least 30 % of its equity is owned by individual Bumiputera shareholder.

References

  1. Duxbury L, Decady Y, Tse A (2002) Adoption and use of computer technology in Canadian small businesses: a comparative study. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, pp 19–47

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baumol WJ (2008) Small enterprises, large firms, productivity growth and wages. J Policy Model 30:575–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shefer D, Frenkel A (2005) R&D, firm size and innovation: an empirical analysis. Technovation 25:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arias-Aranda D, Minguela-Rata B, Rodriguez-Duarte A (2001) Innovation and firm size: an empirical study for Spanish engineering consulting companies. Eur J Innov Manag 4(3): 133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert GB, Watson K, Oliver JE (2007) Technological innovation and organisational culture: an exploratory comparison of larger and smaller firms. J Organ Chang Manag 2(3):65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Welsh JA, White JF (1981) Small business is not a little big business. Harv Bus Rev 59(4):18–32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johannessen JA (1994) Information technology and innovation. Inf Manag Comput Secur 2:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karshenas, Stoneman (1995) Technological diffusion. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbooks of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 265–297

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ollo-Lopez A, Aramendia-Muneta ME (2012) ICT impact on competitiveness, innovation and environment. Telematics Inform 29:204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huergo E (2006) The role of technological management as a source of innovation: evidence from Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 35:1377–1388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Mel S, Mckenzie D, Woodruff C (2009) Innovative firms or innovative owners?: determinants of innovation in micro, small, and medium enterprises. Policy research working paper 4934, pp 3–34

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bugamelli M, Pagano P (2004) Barriers to investment in ICT. Appl Econ 36:2275–2286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hollenstein H (2004) Determinants of the adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT) an empirical analysis based on firm-level data for the Swiss business sector. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 15:315–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Premkumar G, Potter M (1995) Adoption of computer aided software engineering (case) technology: an innovation adoption perspective. Database Adv 26:2–3

    Google Scholar 

  15. Heck RKZ (1998) The entrepreneurial family. Family Business Resources Publishing, Needham

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bruquea S, Moyano J (2007) Organisational determinants of information technology adoption and implementation in SMEs: the case of family and cooperative firms innovation adoption perspective. Technovation 27:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Locke E, Schweiger DM (1979) Participation in decision-making: one more look. In: Cummings LL, Staw BM (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 265–339

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nieto M (2004) Basic propositions for the study of the technological innovation process in the firm. Eur J Innov Manag 7(4):314–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will S (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) Beta, Hamburg. http://www.smartpls.de

  20. Liyanage S, Poon PS (2003) Technology and innovation management learning in the knowledge economy. J Manag Dev 22(7):579–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Krieg EJ (2012) Statistics and data analysis for social science. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Salem

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nunnally J, Berstein I (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sekaran U, Bougie R (2010) Research methods for business: a skill building approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 9(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramayah T, Lee JWC, In JBC (2011) Network collaboration and performance in the tourism sector. Serv Bus 5:411–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hulland J (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strateg Manag J 2(20):195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

I wish to thank Dr. Nurhani Aba Ibrahim for her useful supervision and comments. I gratefully acknowledge the support by Arshad Ayub Graduate Business School, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noni Ngisau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ngisau, N. (2016). The Determinants of Technological Innovation Adoption in Malaysian SMEs. In: Pyeman, J., Wan Rashid, W., Hanif, A., Syed Mohamad, S., Tan, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st AAGBS International Conference on Business Management 2014 (AiCoBM 2014). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-426-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics