Skip to main content
  • 1855 Accesses

Abstract

The article raises the question for an ethical model for the continuous mixed forestry. Among the plethora of approaches reaching from individualistic to holistic ones especially, the question of the dignity or integrity of plants is discussed. This important approach has been regulated since many years in the constitution of Switzerland. The problem is still that the term “dignity” contains too many uncertainties to be exactly described. Another approach to forest ethics is the one of social or Christian ethics. This approach emphasizes the position of the human being as the guard of the creation, and his task is to take care of animals and plants for the common sake. The holistic model finally stresses the interconnectedness of all living beings and their social obligation toward the others. An approximation to it can be found even in some statutory provisions, for example, in § 1 of the German Federal Nature Conservation Act. There, goals of nature conservation and landscape management are that nature and landscape have to be protected because of their own value and as a basis for life and health of people in responsibility for future generations. The holistic model fulfills all expectations and demands for a sustainable world. It also contains the more individualistic aspects of plant dignity or integrity as well as social or Christian ethics and is the optimal approach for the realization of the “continuous mixed forestry” model with all its requirements of an ethically responsible, sustainable forest management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altner, G. (1992). Ethische Aspekte der gentechnischen Veränderung von Pflanzen – Gutachten erstellt im Auftrag des Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asendorpf, D. (2013). Der atmende Planet, Die Zeit, 19. September, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranzke, H. (2002). Würde der Kreatur? Die Idee der Würde im Horizont der Bioethik, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1993). The third Chimpanzee. The evolution and future of the human animal. New York/London et al.: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECNH (2008). The dignity of living beings with regard to plants. http://www.ekah.admin.ch/en/topics/dignity-of-living-beings/index.html.

  • Gill, B. (1992). Pflanzen und Ethik – Zur Kulturgeschichte der “Pflanzenseele” und den ökologischen Folgen ihres Verschwindens. B-gill.userweb.mvn.de/publika/PFLANZS2.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hangartner, G. H. (2002). Waldethik. Theologisch-ethische Überlegungen zu Wald- und Forstwirtschaft – Eine wissenschaftliche Arbeit im Bereich der Umwelt- und Sozialethik, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. (1987). Technik, Medizin und Ethik. Praxis des Prinzips Verantwortung. Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallhoff, A. (2012). Antrittsvorlesung Wien, 23.5.2012, nach Martin Kugler, Die Presse v. 26.5.2012 (Online-Nachrichten).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1968). Anthropologie § 1, BA 3–4, 407, Werkausgabe (W. Weischedel, Ed.). Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kather, R. (2008). Von der Umwelt zur Mitwelt. Die Wiederentdeckung der Natur, Marburger Forum. Beiträge zur geistigen Situation der Gegenwart, Jg. 9, Heft 2., www.Philosophia-online.de/mafo/heft2008-2/Kath_Nat.htm. Accessed 17 Sept 2013.

  • Koechlin, F. (2009). The dignity of plants, plant signaling & Behavior 4:1, Landes Bioscience, Letter to the Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1992). Am Anfang war die Erde. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lötscher, A. (2000). “Würde der Kreatur” – “integrite’ des organismes vivantes”. Sprachanalytische Betrachtungen zur Bedeutung und Auslegung zweier umstrittener Ausdrücke, LEGES 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller, A. (1922). Der Dauerwaldgedanke. Sein Sinn und seine Bedeutung. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odparlik, S. (2010). Die Würde der Pflanze. Ein sinnvolles ethisches Prinzip im Kontext der Grünen Gentechnologie, Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, D. (2007). Die Würde der Kreatur. Rechtsvergleichende Betrachtungen, ZaöRV 67, pp. 319–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöcklin, J. (2007). Die Pflanze. Moderne Konzepte der Biologie. Bern.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen W. Simon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Simon, J.W. (2015). The Holistic Ethics of Sustainability. In: Hongladarom, S. (eds) Food Security and Food Safety for the Twenty-first Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-417-7_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics