Skip to main content

Students’ Patterns and Level of Social Interaction in an Online Forum

  • Conference paper

Abstract

Of late, learning management system is widely used in higher education. One of the most widely used asynchronous communication tools in online courses offered in LMS platform is discussion forum. For blended or hybrid learning courses, online forum can be used to complement face-to-face sessions. In an online forum environment, the students’ participation and interaction levels can be measured and analyzed using social network analysis. This analysis includes measuring (1) degree centrality, (2) betweenness centrality, (3) closeness centrality, and (4) density. In this study, a total of 23 postgraduate students currently undertaking a blended learning course offered by a public university in Malaysia were involved, in which an online forum was conducted for 3 weeks as part of the course requirement. The finding indicates that the communication among the students in the forum is quite low as the network density value is 0.11. Also, six students were identified as the leaders of the information, five students were identified as bridging participants, 13 students were identified as risk participants, 13 students were identified as isolated participants, while two students were not involved in the discussion. This study suggests some recommendations to increase the students’ engagement in online forum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anna, E., César, C., & Alfonso, B. (2012). Distributed teaching presence and communicative patterns in asynchronous learning: Name versus reply networks. Computers & Education, 60(1), 184–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J. (1992). Power in organizations: A social network perspective. In G. Moore & J. A. Whitt (Eds.), Research in politics and society (pp. 295–323). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. S. (1983). Range. In R. S. Burt & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 176–194). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K., & Chan, Y. Y. (2011). Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in knowledge forum. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1445–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e-learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, P. R., Doran, C., & Mazur, A. (2011). Social network analysis as a method for analyzing interaction in collaborative online learning environments. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(7), 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Analyzing patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ online science discussion. In European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning. Proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning. Maastricht. (pp. 421–428).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen, L. P., & Dawson, S. (2010). Mining LMS data to develop an “early warning system” for educators: A proof of concept. Computers & Education, 54(2), 588–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, B., Stuckey, B., Noakes, N., & Nyrop, S. (2005). Breaking down learner isolation: How network analysis informs design and facilitation for online learning. Paper presented at the AERA, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved April 5, 2013, from http://cpsquare.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/stuckey-etal-aera-sna.pdf

  • Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions of online writing: Simultaneous implementation of a forum, blog, and wiki in an EFL blended learning setting. System, 38(2), 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., & Salas, C. J. (1991). Effects of communication network structure: Components of positional centrality. Social Networks, 13, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamela, K. (2010). Participation in online forums: Some insight of Malaysian distance learners. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(4), 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabbany, R., Takaffoli, M., & Zaïane, O. R. (2012). Social network analysis and mining to support the assessment of on-line student participation. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 13(2), 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vercellone-Smith, P., Jablokow, K., & Friedel, C. (2012). Characterizing communication networks in a web-based classroom: Cognitive styles and linguistic behavior of self-organizing groups in online discussions. Computers & Education, 59(2), 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F., & Hsiao, Y. (2012). Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors. Instructional Science, 41(2), 323–343. Advance online publication.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, M., & Spires, H. (2011). Teachers’ interactions in an online graduate course on MOODLE: A social network analysis perspective. Meridian, 13(2).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamalambala/p Durairaj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Umar, I.N., Durairaj, K. (2015). Students’ Patterns and Level of Social Interaction in an Online Forum. In: Tang, S., Logonnathan, L. (eds) Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014 Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-399-6_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics