Skip to main content

A Sociocultural Perspective of Factors Influencing Academic Writing from School to Postsecondary Education

  • Conference paper
Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014 Proceedings

Abstract

This study examined the experience of academic writing of English as a second language (ESL) students in postsecondary education by examining their writing transition from secondary school to postsecondary level in order to obtain a rich picture. A sociocultural approach was used to look into students’ beliefs about writing, expectations of writing and desire for self-expression in writing as they moved from school to postsecondary education. The instruments used in this study were interviews, personal narratives and students’ essays. The findings depicted that students’ academic writing was impacted by students’ histories, experiences and participation in the writing community which were intertwined with individual, institutional and societal factors. This study has implications for teaching and learning of academic writing, i.e. the impact of sociocultural factors, students’ personal histories, experience and intent participation on academic writing should not be underestimated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bacha, N. N. (2002). Developing learners’ academic writing skills in higher education: A study for educational reform. Language and Education, 16(3), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2011). Students’ writing and the transitions from school to university: Hybrid ‘discourse of writing’ positions of students and teachers. In 1st International Australasian conference on enabling access to higher education, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2013). Transition and shifting understandings of writing: Building rich pictures of how moving from school to university is experienced through exploration of students’ discourses of writing. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 7(2), A35–A49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, L. (2005). Identity work and cultural artefacts in literacy learning and use: A sociocultural analysis. Language and Education, 19(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budden, H., Nicolini, M. B., Fox, S. L., & Greene, S. (2002). What we talk about when we talk about college writing. In T. C. Thompson (Ed.), Teaching writing in high school and college: Conversations and collaborations (pp. 73–93). Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. H., & Ain, N. A. (2004). Exploring affect in ESL writing behaviour. The English Teacher, XXXIII, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, Y. M. (1998). The examination culture and its impact on literacy innovations: The case of Singapore. Language and Education, 12(3), 192–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-m. (2002). The problems of university EFL writing in Taiwan. The Korea TESOL Journal, 5(1), 50–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clerehan, R., & Walker, I. (2003). Student perceptions of preparedness for first-year university assignment writing: The discipline of marketing. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 2(1), 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffin, C., Curry, M. J., Goodman, S., Hewings, A., Lillis, T. M., & Swann, J. (2003). Teaching academic writing: A toolkit for higher education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crème, P. (2000). The ‘personal’ in university writing: Uses of reflective learning journals. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 97–111). Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. (2010). Preface. In K. Ecclestone, G. Biesta, & M. Hughes (Eds.), Transitions and learning through the lifecourse (pp. xvii–xxiv). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (2006). Multilingual writing in preschool through 12th grade. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 337–354). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales-Villegas, S. (2007, September 15–17). L2 writing around the Pacific Rim. Invited colloquim, Symposium on second language writing: Second language writing in the Pacific Rim. Organised by Symposium on second language writing (SSLW) and hosted by Nagoya Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, J. P., & Stowe, S. (2005). Language problems of international and domestic ESL students at UBC, York, McGill and Dalhousie, and academic achievements. http://www.csse.ca/ccse/docs/JPaulGraysonSusanStave.pdf. 14 July 2012.

  • Harklau, L. (2001). From high school to college: Students perspectives on literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 33(1), 33–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, P. (2007). Towards a philosophy of human learning: An existentialist perspective. In P. Jarvis & S. Parker (Eds.), Human learning: An holistic approach (pp. 1–15). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. E. (2006). The sociocultural turn and its challenges for second language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, C. (2005). Discourses of schooling in contemporary Malaysia: Pedagogical practices and ethnic politics. Australian Journal of Education, 49(1), 28–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, K. (2007, September 15–17). L2 writing around the Pacific Rim. Invited colloquim, Symposium on second language writing: Second language writing in the Pacific Rim. Organised by Symposium on second language writing (SSLW) and hosted by Nagoya Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketter, J., & Hunter, J. (2002). Creating a writer’s identity on the boundaries of two communities of practice. In C. Bazerman & D. R. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives. Perspectives on writing (pp. 307–329). Colorado: The WAC Clearinghouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, Y. L., & Soo, H. P. L. (2007). The social construction of literacy by Malaysian Chinese parents: Perceptions of parents towards the language and literacy practices of two teenage children. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer-Dahl, A. (2004). Writing and learning in cross-national perspective: Transitions from secondary to higher education. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 47(4), 352–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer-Dahl, A. (2007, September 15–17). L2 writing around the Pacific Rim. Invited colloquim, Symposium on second language writing: Second language writing in the Pacific Rim. Organised by Symposium on second language writing (SSLW) and hosted by Nagoya Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In M. P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contribution to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141–158). England: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P. (2006). Sociocultural theory and L2: State of the art. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 67–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1–31). London: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: Sociocultural perspectives on academic work. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(6), 711–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 32–46). Buckingham: SRHE & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F. (2012). Changing participation and identity in writing transition: A case study. Asian Journal of University Education, 8(1), 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F. (2013). Writing transition in postsecondary education: A case study. 6th international conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2012). Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F., Lee, S. K., Siti, H. S., & Saadiyah, D. (2009). The culture of writing of L2 writers in transition from secondary school to postsecondary education. Asian Journal of University Education, 5(2), 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlewood, W. (1996). Academic writing in intercultural contexts: Integrating conventions and personal voice. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lvovich, N. (2003). Sociocultural identity and academic writing: A second-language learner profile. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 31(2), 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthey, S. J., & Garcia, G. E. (2005). English language learners’ writing practices and attitudes. Written Communication, 22(1), 36–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, J. (2006). Learning English writing in a Japanese university: Developing critical argument and establishing writer identity. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(2), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2004). Identity and language use: The politics of speaking ESL in schools. In A. Pavlenko & A. Blackledge (Eds.), Negotiation of identities in multilingual context (pp. 290–395). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (2004). Second language learning theories. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Na’ilah, S. N., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2005). Development through life: A psychosocial approach. Massachusetts: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oda, S., & Yamamoto, Y. (2007, September 15–17). Japanese university students’ transition from high school English to EAP. Symposium on second language writing: Second language writing in the Pacific Rim. Organised by Symposium on second language writing (SSLW) and hosted by Nagoya Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preto-Bay, A. M. (2004). The socio-cultural dimension of academic literacy development and the explicit teaching of genres as community heuristics. The Reading Matrix, 4, 86–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubdy, R. (2004). Reinventing knowledge in the ESL writing classroom. In K. Kaur & M. E. Vethaman (Eds.), Second language writing (pp. 142–173). Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spack, R. (2004). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: A longitudinal case study, updated. In V. Zamel & R. Spack (Eds.), Crossing the curriculum: Multilingual learners in the college classroom (pp. 19–45). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. E., & Miller, J. (2007). Writing in English in Malaysian high schools: The discourse of examinations. Language and Education, 21(2), 124–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L. (2004). Cultural historical activity theory and the object of innovation. In O. St. John, K. van Esch, & E. Schalkwijk (Eds.), New insights into foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 51–70). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ting, S. H., & Tee, P. F. (2008). TESL undergraduates’ ability to handle text-types at University Malaysia Sarawak. ASIATIC, 2(2), 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuraidah, A., & Melor, Md. Y. (2004). An ESL writing course: Unravelling students’ needs and concerns. www.melta.org.my/ET/2004/2004-114.pdf. 17 April 2007.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) from the Ministry of Education (MOE) and Principal Investigator Support Initiative (PSI) from Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lai Fong Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, L.F., Sidhu, G.K., Chan, Y.F. (2015). A Sociocultural Perspective of Factors Influencing Academic Writing from School to Postsecondary Education. In: Tang, S., Logonnathan, L. (eds) Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014 Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-399-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics