Skip to main content

Effects of Spreadsheet Towards Mathematics Learners’ Problem Solving Abilities

  • Conference paper
Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014 Proceedings

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a study exploring the effects of using spreadsheet towards preuniversity students’ problem solving abilities. The sample of this quasi-experimental study comprised 64 preuniversity students from a private college in Malaysia. The experimental group was taught the topic limits using a spreadsheet module while the control group was taught using the traditional module. Observation was done throughout the treatment, and data about problem solving abilities was collected, analysed and transcribed for differences in both groups. The results revealed the following differences between both groups: (a) number of correctly solved problems, (b) problem solving strategy, (c) preference in problem and solution presentation and (d) priority in problem solving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apostol, T. M. (1981). Mathematical analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, N., Brown, T., Hanley, U., & Darby, S. (2006). Forming conjectures within a spreadsheet environment. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 100–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furina, G. (1994, July). Personal reconstruction of concept definitions: Limits. Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the Mathematical Education Research Group of Australasia, Lismore, Australia. Retrieved on June 29, 2013, from http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP_Furina_1994.pdf

  • Mayer, R. E. (1985). Implication of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 123–139). Hillside: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanic, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (1989). Historical perspectives on problem solving in the mathematics curriculum. In R. Charles & E. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 1–22). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tall, D. (1976). Conflicts and catastrophes in the learning of mathematics. Mathematical Education for Teaching, 2(4), 2–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., Ainley, J., & Bills, L. (2004, July). Spreadsheet generalising and paper and pencil generalising. Paper presented at the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Bergen, Norway. Retrieved on June 29, 2013, from http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME28/RR/RR089_Wilson.pdf

  • Wilson, K., Ainley, J., & Bills, L. (2005, July). Spreadsheets, pedagogic strategies and the evolution of meaning for variable. Paper presented at the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved on June 29, 2013, from http://emis.library.cornell.edu/proceedings/PME29/PME29RRPapers/PME29Vol4WilsonEtAl.pdf

  • Yeo, K. K. J. (2009). Secondary 2 students’ difficulties in solving non-routine problems. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 10, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kok Fui Chin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Content of Spreadsheet and Traditional Module

Appendix: Content of Spreadsheet and Traditional Module

W

Learning outcome

Problem to be solved

1

Judge the validity of limits with reference to the formal definition

Lina and John are arguing with the limit of \( {a}_n=\frac{1}{n} \) as n becomes large. Lina says that the limit is 0 but John claims that the limit could be 1. Whose statement do you think is correct? Why?

2

Identify the significance and relationship of ɛ and N in the formal definition

In the previous task, Lina and John were arguing with the limit of \( {a}_n=\frac{1}{n} \) as n becomes large. Lina said that the limit should be 0 but John said that the limit could be 1. From the activity, you saw that Lina’s statement is “more correct” due to more TRUE. However, there is no TRUE for Lina when ɛ = 0.1. Do you think that Lina’s statement is still correct? Why?

3

Prove the implication that if the limit of a sequence exists and is known, then the limit is the horizontal line clustered by infinitely many points

What can you say about the relationship between the limit of a sequence a n and the clustered value of its scatter plot?

4

Predict the limit of a sequence geometrically

Explain how the limit of a sequence a n can be obtained from its scatter plot?

5

Prove the implication that if there exists no horizontal line of clustered points, then the limit does not exist

From previous activities, we know that if the limit of a sequence is A, then the horizontal line y = A would be clustered by infinitely many points. How about if we are not able to identify a horizontal line of clustered points, can we say that a limit does not exist? Why?

6

Disprove the implication that if y = A is a horizontal line of clustered points, then the limit of the sequence is A

From previous activities, we know that if the limit of a sequence is A, then the horizontal line y = A would be clustered by infinitely many points. How about if y = A is a horizontal line of clustered points, can we say that the limit of the sequence is A? Why?

Let {x n } and {y n } be two sequences of real numbers in such a way that \( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim }{x}_n=X \) and \( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim }{y}_n=Y \) where \( X,Y\in \mathrm{R}. \) Is the following statement true? Why?

7

Prove the distributivity of sum of limits

\( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim}\left({x}_n+{y}_n\right)=X+Y \)

8

Prove the distributivity of scalar product of limits

\( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim}\left(l{x}_n\right)=lX \) where \( l\in \mathrm{R} \)

9

Prove the distributivity of difference of limits

\( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim}\left({x}_n-{y}_n\right)=X-Y \)

10

Prove the distributivity of product of limits

\( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim}\left({x}_n\cdot {y}_n\right)=X\cdot Y \)

11

Prove the distributivity of quotient of limits

\( \underset{n\to \infty }{ \lim}\left(\frac{x_n}{y_n}\right)=\frac{X}{Y} \), where Y ≠ 0

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chin, K.F., Syed Zamri, S.N.A.b. (2015). Effects of Spreadsheet Towards Mathematics Learners’ Problem Solving Abilities. In: Tang, S., Logonnathan, L. (eds) Taylor’s 7th Teaching and Learning Conference 2014 Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-399-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics