Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology ((BRIEFSWATER))

  • 532 Accesses

Abstract

The present study is an attempt to assess the vulnerability of watersheds in face of climate change and change in urbanization with the help of multi-criteria decision-making and artificial neural networks. The study was carried out keeping in view the scarcity in amount of water and degradation in quality of water observed in different watersheds in various parts of the World due to the onset of climatic vulnerabilities and rapid change in urbanization. An indicator was also proposed and a model was developed linked to the indicator. The said indicator is objective, relative and cognitive in nature so that it can depict accurate representation of the status of any watershed. The study results provided a platform to uniformly rate different river basins in terms of climate change and urbanization which in turn will help to mitigate the disasters by concentrating funds and energy to the locations where it is really required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chaves, H. M. L., & Alipaz, S. (2007). An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: The watershed sustainability index. Water Resources Management, 21(5), 883–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, T. (2014). Eight foods you’re about to lose due to climate change. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/vital-signs/2014/oct/29/diet-climate-maple-syrup-coffee-global-warming.

  • Heede, B. H. (1975). Watershed indicators of landform development.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. S., et al. (2005). Spatial considerations for linking watershed land cover to ecological indicators in streams. Ecological Applications, 15(1), 137–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA. (2014). Global Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Retrieved from http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/.

  • Pasco, M. M., & Picut, N. G. (2011). Vulnerability assessment of Cugman River Watershed. IUFRO World Series, 29, 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M. T. (2001). A critique of EPA’s index of watershed indicators. Journal of Environmental Management, 62(4), 429–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevention Web. (2007). Preparing for flood disaster: Mapping and assessing hazard in the Ratu watershed, Nepal. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=9295.

  • Conservation Ontario Report. (2009, August). Natural Hazards. Retrieved from http://www.conservationhalton.ca/natural-hazards.

  • Chang, C.-L., & Hsu, C.-H. (2010). Applying a modified VIKOR method to classify land subdivisions according to watershed vulnerability. Water Resources Management, 25, 301–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, C., Malcolm, S. B., Dahlberg, K. A., & Bojie, F. (2000). A conceptual framework for integrating hydrological and biological indicators into watershed management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49(1–2), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque, Y. M., Tripathi, S., Hantush, M. M., & Govindaraju, R. S. (2012). Watershed reliability, resilience and vulnerability analysis under uncertainty using water quality data. Journal of Environmental Management, 109, 101–112. Retrieved October 30, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junior, R. F. V., Varandas, S. G. P., Fernandes, L. F. S., & Pacheco, F. A. L. (2015). Multi Criteria Analysis for the monitoring of aquifer vulnerability: A scientific tool in environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, 250–264. Retrieved April, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik, P., Joshi, P. K., & Yang, X. (2005). Multiple hazard mapping (MHM) for vulnerability assessment in Pali Gad watershed using geospatial tools. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 33, 441–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, L. F. (2007). Comparison of Water Quality Index (WQI) between DOE Method and Harkin’s Index. Master Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoudi, M., & Amiri, E. (2015). A new model for Hazard evaluation of vegetation degradation using Dpsir framework, a case study: Sadra Region, Iran. Polish Journal of Ecology, 63(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, A., Winkler, R., & Fry, L. (2014). Classification of watersheds into integrated social and biophysical indicators with clustering analysis. Ecological Indicators, 45, 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narmada, K., Gobinath, K., & Bhaskaran, G. (2015). An assessment of resource potentials for sustainable development of micro-watershed in Tirunelveli District using geoinformatics—a case of Nambiyar micro-watershed in Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu. Aquatic Procedia, 4(2015), 1299–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, G. J., Johnston, C. A., & Wolter, P. T. (2015). Development of Environmental Indicators for the US Great Lakes Basin Using Remote Sensing Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Policy Research Initiative, Sustainable development briefing note. Canadian water sustainability index. (2007). http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/PH2-1-14-2007E.pdf. Retrieved December 30, 2013.

  • Sanchez, G. M., Nejadhashemi, A. P., Zhang, Z., Marquart-Pyatt, S., Habron, G., & Shortridge, A. (2015). Linking watershed-scale stream health and socioeconomic indicators with spatial clustering and structural equation modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 70, 113–127. Retrieved August, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, C. (2002). Calculating a water poverty index. World Development, 30(7), 1195–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilt, B. (2012). Damming China’s Angry River: Vulnerability in a Culturally and Biologically Diverse Watershed. In Water, Cultural Diversity, and Global Environmental Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. T., O’Neill, R. V., & Smith, E. R. (2012). A watershed-based method for environmental vulnerability assessment with a case study of the Mid-Atlantic region. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 34, 58–64. Retrieved April, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernier, F., Miralles, A., Pinet, F., Carluer, N., Gouy, V., Molla, G., & Petit, K. (2013). EIS Pesticides: An environmental information system to characterize agricultural activities and calculate agro-environmental indicators at embedded watershed scales. Agricultural Systems, 122, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusoff, S. M. A. M., & Zardari, N. H. (2015). Trend analysis of publications on watershed sustainability indicators in popular academic databases. In ISFRAM 2014, pp 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uttam Roy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roy, U., Majumder, M. (2016). Introduction. In: Vulnerability of Watersheds to Climate Change Assessed by Neural Network and Analytical Hierarchy Process. SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-344-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics