Skip to main content

Optimal Charging Strategies of Plug-in Electric Vehicles for Minimizing Load Variance Within Smart Grids

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Plug In Electric Vehicles in Smart Grids

Part of the book series: Power Systems ((POWSYS))

Abstract

With serious concerns on global warming and energy crisis, there are plenty of motivations for developing and commercializing plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). It is believed that substitution of PEVs for conventional fuel vehicles can help reduce the greenhouse gases emission, increase the energy efficiency, enhance the integration of renewable energy, and so forth. At the same time, the impact of PEVs as an emerging electrical load for power grid has drawn increasing attention most recently. The possible challenge for power grids lies in that the penetration of large number of PEVs may trigger extreme surges in demand at rush hours, and therefore, harm the stability and security of the existing power grids. Nevertheless, there are also potential opportunities for power grids. An optimal scenario is to dig the potential of PEVs as moveable energy storage devices, which means PEVs withdrawing electricity from grid at off-peak hours and then feeding back energy deposited in the onboard batteries to grid at peak hours. This concept is also termed as vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology. The key to the implementation of V2G is how to effectively integrate information into energy conversion, transmission and distribution. V2G should be carried out within the framework of smart grid, so that the status information of power grid can be perceived. In addition, the demand information of PEV owners should also be taken into account, so that the function of PEVs as transportation tools can be guaranteed. In this chapter, the possible scenarios of V2G implementation within both the household smart micro-grid and the smart regional grid will be discussed. The related mathematical formulation will also be analyzed. It is essentially an optimization problem, and the objective is to minimize the overall load variance of power grids. Case studies will be conducted. The results demonstrate that V2G operation can definitely help flatten the overall power load curves and it enables power grid to contain newly added PEV loads to some extent without boosting its capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (2010) GISS surface temperature analysis. December 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Energy Outlook (2013) http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2013).pdf

  3. Eric Evarts (2011) Leaf, Volt tests show electric cars cost less per mile to operate. Consumer reports. Accessed 10 Dec 2011

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botsford C, Szczepanek A (2009) Fast charging vs. slow charging: pros and cons for the new age of electric vehicles. In: Proceeding of EVS24, Stavanger, Norway, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guildhary F (2012) IBM, Honda, and PG&E enable smarter charging for electric vehicles. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/37398.wss. Accessed 12 Apr 2012

  6. Guille C, Gross G (2009) A conceptual framework for the vehicle-to-grid implementation. Energy Policy 37(11):4379–4390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kempton W, Tomic J (2005) Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: from stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy. J Power Source 144:280–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Amoroso F, Cappuccino G (2012) Advantages of efficiency-aware smart charging strategies for PEVs. Energy Convers Manage 54(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomic J, Kempton W (2007) Using fleets of electric-drive vehicles for grid support. J Power Source 168:459–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clement-Nyns K, Haesen E, Driesen J (2011) The impact of vehicle-to-grid on the distribution grid. Electr Power Syst Res 81:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jian J, Xue H et al (2013) Regulated charging of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles for minimizing load variance in household smart micro-grid. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 60(8):3218–3226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Judd S, Overbye T (2008) An evaluation of PHEV contributions to power system disturbances and economics. In: The 40th North American power symposium

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masoum A, Deilami S et al (2011) Smart load management of plug-in electric vehicles in distribution and residential networks with charging stations for peak shaving and loss minimization considering voltage regulation. IET Proc Gener Transm Distrib 5(8):877–888

    Google Scholar 

  14. Deilami S, Masoum A, Moses P, Masoum M (2011) Real-time coordination of plug-in electric vehicle charging in smart grids to minimize power losses and improve voltage profile. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2(3):456–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mullen S (2009) Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles as a source of distributed frequency regulation. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clement-Nyns K, Haesen E, Driesen J (2010) The impact of charging plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on a residential distribution grid. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(1):371–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sortomme E, Hindi M, Macpherson S, Venkata S (2011) Coordinated charging of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles to minimize distribution system losses. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2(1):198–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh M, Kar I, Kumar P (2010) Influence of EV on grid power quality and optimizing the charging schedule to mitigate voltage imbalance and reduce power loss. In: The 14th international power electronics and motion control conference

    Google Scholar 

  19. Acha S, Green T, Shah N (2010) Effects of optimized plug-in hybrid vehicle charging strategies on electric distribution network losses. In: Transmission and distribution conference and exposition

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang L, Singh C, Kusiak A (2012) Guest editorial: special issue on integration of intermittent renewable energy resources into power grid. IEEE Syst J 6(1):2–3

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saber A, Venayagamoorthy G (2011) Plug-in vehicles and renewable energy sources for cost and emission reductions. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 58(4):1229–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jian J, Xu G et al (2011) Intelligent multi-mode energy-refreshing station for electric vehicles within the framework of smart grid. In: IEEE international conference on information and automation, pp 534–539

    Google Scholar 

  23. Steer K, Wirth A, Halgamuge S (2012) Decision tree ensembles for online operation of large smart grids. Energy Convers Manage 59(1):9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva M, Morais H, Vale Z (2012) An integrated approach for distributed energy resource short-term scheduling in smart grids considering realistic power system simulation. Energy Convers Manage 64:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Slootweg H (2009) Smart grids—the future or fantasy. IET conference: smart metering—making it happen, Feb 2009

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mehrizi-Sani A, Iravani R (2010) Potential-function based control of a microgrid in island and grid-connected modes. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(4):1883–1891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Musavi F, Edington M, Eberle W, Dunford W (2011) Energy efficiency in plug-in hybrid electric vehicle chargers: evaluation and comparison of front end AC-DC topologies. In: IEEE energy conversion congress and exposition, pp 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sun W, Yuan Y (2006) Optimization theory and methods: nonlinear programming. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kanchev H, Colas F, Lazarov V, Francois B (2011) Energy management and operational planning of a microgrid with a PV-based active generator for smart grid applications. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 58(10):4583–4592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Agarwal V, Uthaichana K, DeCarlo R, Tsoukalas L (2010) Development and validation of a battery model useful for discharging and charging power control and lifetime estimation. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 25(3):821–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dogger J, Roossien B, Nieuwenhout F (2011) Characterization of li-ion batteries for intelligent management of distributed grid-connected storage. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 26(1):256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linni Jian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jian, L., Xu, G., Chan, C.C. (2015). Optimal Charging Strategies of Plug-in Electric Vehicles for Minimizing Load Variance Within Smart Grids. In: Rajakaruna, S., Shahnia, F., Ghosh, A. (eds) Plug In Electric Vehicles in Smart Grids. Power Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-317-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-317-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-316-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-317-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics