Advertisement

Education-Based Mobility and the Chinese Civilization

  • Hsueh-Cheng YenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 26)

Abstract

This article addresses two issues of mobility in Chinese education: the emergence of the meritocratic ideal and its realization through the civil service examination. My argument is based on a theory of civilization. I contend that a complex society must transcend the kinship principle to incorporate non-kin strangers into an enlarged social unit. Historical evidence has shown that the pre-Qin philosophers acknowledged the stranger problem and argued against guanxi or relationalism. Instead of the kinship principle, which calculates social distance, ancient philosophers proposed a ladder structure whereby strangers could be evaluated based on meritocratic standards. They insisted that a person’s position on the ladder should be the basis for distributing political power and material wealth in a complex civilization. However, upward mobility in a meritocracy was a threat to the ruling class. In considering class reproduction, modern scholarship generally agrees that education mobility was only a facade and commoners obtained no true mobility. I argue that this position disregards the power struggles between the Chinese emperors and their court officials. Mobility, as exemplified in the civil service examination, can be seen as a strategy of the emperors to recruit new members to supplant the old guard in court. As the examination system consolidated the power of rulers at the expense of the reigning bureaucrats, both the meritocracy and imperial autocracy reinforced each other. Moreover, encouraging commoners to compete in the examination also provided an efficient way for integrating local societies into the empire.

Keywords

Complex society Meritocracy Social mobility Resource distribution Ladder structure 

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society, 7, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P., & Passerson, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society, and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Dill, D. D., & Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking system. Higher Education, 49, 495–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Ebrey, P. B., & Watson, J. (Eds.). (1986). Kinship organization in late imperial China, 1000–1940. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Elman, B. (1991). Political, social, and cultural reproduction via civil service examinations in late imperial China. The Journal of Asian Studies, 50(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freedman, M. (1958). Lineage organization in southeastern China. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gold, T., Guthrie, G., & Wank, D. (2002). An introduction to the study of guanxi. In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Eds.), Social connections in China: Institutions, culture, and the changing nature of guanxi (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ho, P.-T. (1962). The ladder of success in imperial China: Aspects of social mobility, 1368–1911. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  10. Holland, D., & Kipnis, A. (1994). Metaphors for embarrassment and stories of exposure: The not-so-egocentric self in American culture. Ethos, 22(3), 316–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs, B. J. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic ties in Chinese political alliances: kan-ch’ing and kuan-hsi in a rural Taiwanese township. The China Quarterly, 78, 237–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kipnis, A. (2011). Governing educational desire: Culture, politics, and schooling in China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewellen, T. C. (2003). Political anthropology: An introduction (3rd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  14. Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin, Y.-H. (1947). The golden wing: A sociological study of Chinese familism. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
  16. Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyazaki, I. (1981). China’s examination hell: The civil service examinations of imperial China (C. Schirokauer, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ong, A. (2004). Higher learning: Education availability and flexible citizenship in global space. In J. A. Banks (Ed.), Diversity and citizen education: global perspective. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Sahlins, M. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  20. Service, E. R. (1962). Primitive social organization: An evolutionary perspective. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  21. Shweder, A. R., & Bourne, E. J. (1984). Does concept of person vary cross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Cultural theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Spiro, M. (1993). Is the Western conception of the self “peculiar” within the context of the world cultures? Ethos, 21(2), 107–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wallerstein, I. M. (1974). The modern world-system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Watkins, D., & Biggs, J. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  25. Watson, R. (1985). Inequality among brothers: Class and kinship in south China. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Willis, P. (1981). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Yan, Y. (1996). The flow of gifts: Reciprocity and social networks in a Chinese village. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Yang, M. M.-H. (1994). Gifts, favors, and banquets: The art of social relationships in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Yu, Y.-S. (1980). Chinese intelligentsia: The classical period. Taipei, Taiwan: Lian Jing Publishing (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations