Advertisement

The Conflict Between Social Mobility and Individual Development

  • Hsueh-Cheng YenEmail author
  • Yuh-Yin Wu
Chapter
Part of the Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects book series (EDAP, volume 26)

Abstract

This paper discusses some of the controversies in Chinese education with experiences from Taiwan. Taiwanese share the same ethnic Confucian heritage as that of the people from China. The focus is whether education should function as a mechanism for social mobility or to promote individual development. We traced the controversies to the Confucian moral-political order that insists that a good society should allocate its political power, material wealth, and social prestige based on individual merit. When education provides upward mobility, it becomes a mechanism for the distribution of social resources. The mobility motive can be witnessed in modern Chinese and Taiwanese education. However, the joint entrance examination and the classroom ban-ji system as ways for allocating resources also produce ill effects. Schools are ranked as the result of the joint entrance examination. Strategies for educational reform have been adopted to amend the situation for schools/university departments as well as individuals. In the end, it does not seem that the reform has provided an alternative for distribution of resources, and it faces tremendous difficulty as people still wish to find upward mobility in education.

Keywords

Confucian moral-political order Education reform in Taiwan Individual development Joint entrance examination Social mobility 

References

  1. Chin, M. C. (2004). 大學多元入學制度實施與改革之研究 [Better or worse: Examining the feasibility of the college multiple entrance program]. Educational Policy Forum, 7(2), 59–84.Google Scholar
  2. Chou, C. P., & Ching, G. (2012). Taiwan education at the crossroad: When globalization meets localization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chua, A. (2011). The battle hymn of the tiger mother. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  4. Clifford, J. (1983). On ethnographic authority. Representations, 2, 118–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Li, J. (2012). Cultural foundations of learning: East and West. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu, J. (2012). Does cram schooling matter? Who goes to cram school? Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2005). 國民小學及國民中學常態編班及分組學習準則 [Regulations for normal distributed class procedures and grouping of learning for elementary and junior high schools]. Retrieved from http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawContent.aspx?PCODE=H0070026
  8. Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2014a). 直轄市及各縣市短期補習班全國統計 [Statistics of short-term tutorial centers at Taiwan]. Retrieved from http://bsb.edu.tw/
  9. Ministry of Education, Republic of China (Taiwan). (2014b). 大專校院概況表 (80~102 學年度) [Overview of the number of Colleges and Universities (1991–2014)]. Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/main_statistics/u.xls
  10. Miyazaki, I. (1976). China’s examination hell. New York: Weatherhill.Google Scholar
  11. Primary and Junior High School Act, Legislative Yuan of Republic of China §12. (2004). 國民教育法 [Primary and junior high school act]. Retrieved from http://law.moj.gov.tw/Eng/LawClass/LawContent.aspx?PCODE=H0070001
  12. Research center for psychological and educational testing, Taiwan. (2014a). 國中教育會考之標準設定說明 [Standards setting of comprehensive graduation assessment program of junior high schools, Taiwan]. Retrieved from http://cap.ntnu.edu.tw/fly/103/1038505.html
  13. Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, Taiwan. (2014b). 103 年國中教育會考各科能力等級加標示人數百分比統計表 [Percentage of students at three ability levels of 2014 comprehensive graduate assessment results of junior high schools, Taiwan]. Retrieve from http://cap.ntnu.edu.tw/1030605-1.html
  14. Thomas, N. (1999). Becoming undisciplined: Anthropology and cultural studies. In H. Moore (Ed.), Anthropological theory today (pp. 262–279). Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Watkins, D., & Biggs, J. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, the University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and CounselingNational Taipei University of EducationTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations