Abstract
One-to-one interviews have been used extensively in Australia by both researchers and teachers to assess young children’s mathematical understanding. This chapter discusses the use of a one-to-one task based interview developed as part of the Early Numeracy Research Project. The First Year of School Mathematics Interview component has been used in a range of research contexts, both prior to school and in the early years. A recent study, using the interview with children with Down syndrome where the interview was presented in a more flexible manner, raises important questions regarding its use both in research and practice. The opportunities and expectations during the transition to school and how these may be enhanced by the use of one-to-one assessment interviews is also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdelhameed, H., & Porter, J. (2006). Counting in Egyptian children with down syndrome. International Journal of Special Education, 21(3), 176–187.
Bobis, J., & Gould, P. (1999). The mathematical achievement of children in the Count Me in Too program. In J. M. Truran & K. M. Truran (Eds.), Making the difference (Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 84–90). Adelaide: MERGA.
Bobis, J., Clarke, B. A., Clarke, D. M., Gould, P., Thomas, G., Wright, R., & Young-Loveridge, J. (2005). Supporting teachers in the development of young children’s mathematical thinking: Three large scale cases. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(3), 27–57.
Brown, R. I., & Semple, L. (1970). Effects of unfamiliarity on the overt verbalisation and perceptual motor behaviour of nursery school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40(3), 291–298.
Carpenter, T. P., & Moser, J. M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179–202.
Carpenter, T., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clarke, D. J. (1989). Assessment alternatives in mathematics. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.
Clarke, B. A., & Faragher, R. (2004). Possibilities not limitations: Developing mathematics thinking in children with special needs. In B. Clarke, D. M. Clarke, D. V. Lambdin, F. K. Lester, G. Emanuelson, B. Johansson, A. Wallby, & K. Wallby (Eds.), International perspectives on learning and teaching mathematics (pp. 379–395). Goteborg: National Center for Mathematics Education, Goteborg University.
Clarke, B. A., & Robbins, J. (2004). Numeracy enacted: Preschool families’ conception of their children’s engagement with numeracy. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millenium: Towards 2010 (Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 1, pp. 175–182). Townsville: MERGA.
Clarke, D., Cheeseman, J., Gervasoni, A., Gronn, D., Horne, M., McDonough, A., Montgomery, P., Roche, A., Sullivan, P., Clarke, B., & Rowley, G. (2002). Early Numeracy Research Project final report. Melbourne: Mathematics Teaching and Learning Centre, Australian Catholic University.
Clarke, B. A., Clarke, D. M., & Cheeseman, J. (2006). The mathematical knowledge and understanding young children bring to school. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(1), 78–102.
Clarke, D., Clarke, B., & Roche, A. (2011). Building teachers’ expertise in understanding, assessing and developing children’s mathematical thinking: The power of task-based, one-to-one interviews. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(6), 901–913.
Clements, M. A., & Ellerton, N. (1995). Assessing the effectiveness of pencil-and-paper tests for school mathematics. In B. Atweh & S. Flavel (Eds.), Galtha: MERGA 18 (Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia pp. 184–188). Darwin: University of the Northern Territory.
Downs, A., & Strands, P. S. (2006) Using assessment to improve the effectiveness of early childhood education. Journal of Childhood Family Studies, 15, 671–680.
Faragher, R., & Clarke, B. A. (2014). Educating learners with Down syndrome: Research, theory and practice with children and adolescents. London: Routledge.
Faragher, R., Brady, J., Clarke, B. A., Clarke, D. M., & Gervasoni, A. (2008). Narrowing the gap: Empowering teachers and parents through understanding how children with Down syndrome develop mathematically. In L. Graham (Ed.), Proceedings of the ‘Narrowing the Gap: Addressing Educational Disadvantage’ conference (pp. 56–62). Armidale: SiMERR.
Fleer, M., & Quinones, G. (2013). An assessment perezhivanie: building an assessment pedagogy for, with and of early childhood science learning. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstrone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 231–247). Dordrecht: Springer.
Fuson, K. (1992). Research on whole number addition and subtraction. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 243–275). New York: Macmillan.
Gervasoni, A. (2004). Exploring an intervention strategy for six and seven year old children who are vulnerable in learning school mathematics. Unpublished PhD thesis, Latrobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Ginsburg, H. (2009). The challenge of formative assessment in mathematics education: Children’s minds, teachers’ minds. Human Development, 52, 109–128.
Ginsburg, H., Klein, A., & Starkey, P. (1998).The development of children’s mathematical thinking: Connecting research with practice. In I. E. Siegel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 4): Child psychology in practice (pp. 23–26). New York: Wiley.
Higgins, J., Parsons, R., & Hyland, M. (2003). The numeracy development project: Policy to practice. In J. Livingstone (Ed.), New Zealand annual review of education (pp. 157–174). Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
McDonough, A., Clarke, B. A., & Clarke, D. M. (2002). Understanding assessing and developing young children’s mathematical thinking: the power of the one-to-one interview for preservice teachers in providing insights into appropriate pedagogical practices. International Journal of Education Research, 37, 211–226.
Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (1996). Children’s representations of multiplication and division word problems. In J. Mulligan & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Children’s number learning: A research monograph of MERGA/AAMT (pp. 163–184). Adelaide: AAMT.
Schorr, R. Y. (2001). A study of the use of clinical interviewing techniques with prospective teachers. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 153–160). Utrecht: PME.
Wishart, J. G. (1996). Avoidant learning styles and cognitive development in young children. In B. Stratford & P. Gunn (Eds.), New approaches to Down syndrome (pp. 173–205). London: Cassell.
Wright, R. (1998). An overview of a research-based framework for assessing and teaching early number learning. In C. Kanes, M. Goos, & E. Warren (Eds.), Teaching mathematics in new times (Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 701–708). Brisbane: MERGA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clarke, B. (2015). Assessing Young Children’s Mathematical Understanding: Opportunities and Expectations at the Transition to School. In: Perry, B., MacDonald, A., Gervasoni, A. (eds) Mathematics and Transition to School. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-215-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-215-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-214-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-215-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)