Skip to main content

Listening to Children’s Mathematics in School

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematics and Transition to School

Part of the book series: Early Mathematics Learning and Development ((EMLD))

Abstract

England’s Foundation Stage (birth to five) encourages children’s interests to be central in developing the curriculum. As children enter school, in the last year of this stage, political and organisational pressures take over forcing teachers to have uneasy pedagogies. From a postructural stance the ‘schoolification’ of the child begins and there is a great divide between the mathematics of the child and that of the school. The literature on transitions exposes curricula dissonance not only in England but across Europe, Australasia and North America. Dialogues from teachers highlight their confusion about how and when to teach calculation and especially mathematical notation. Mathematics becomes more teacher centred with strict objectives. The data from England’s National Assessments continue to show poor achievement in mathematical problem solving in the Foundation Stage. There needs to be a conceptual shift in the teaching of mathematics to young children in English schools to encompass children’s enquiries. This is from a Vygotskian perspective where there is priority given to social and cultural practices stressing the importance of co-participation. This could identify and enhance children’s mathematical problem solving. There is, however, much challenge for teachers not only in understanding children’s own mathematics that involves children’s agency but at the same time they need to confront the organisational walls of opposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education (ACME). (2013). Response to the consultation on the draft programme of study for the National Curriculum. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anning, A. (2003). Pathways to the literacy club. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, C. (1997). Mathematics teaching in the early years: An investigation of teacher’s subject knowledge. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, C. (2004) Implementing the foundation stage in reception classes. British Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, N., Wood, E., & Rogers, S. (1998). Teaching through play. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, L. E. (2003). Child development. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomer, R., & Bomer, K. (2001). For a better world: Reading and writing for social action. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, L. (2002). Starting school. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, L. (2008). Supporting transitions in early years. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, E. (2012). Are the children thinking mathematically? The pedagogy of children’s mathematical graphics. In M. McAteer (Ed.), Improving primary mathematics teaching and learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, E. (2013, September). Teachers’ perspectives on children’s mathematics. Paper presented at the EECERA Conference, Tallinn, Estonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, E., & Butcher, E. (2013). Mathematics: Young children co-construct their mathematical enquiries. In P. Beckley (Ed.), Early years foundation stage. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2005). Making sense of mathematical graphics: The development of understanding abstract symbolism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2006). Children’s mathematics: Making marks, making meaning. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2011). Understanding children’s mathematical graphics; beginnings in play. Maidenhead: Open University press

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, A. (2013). Tackling under achievement in mathematics through creativity in the primary school. Project funded by the Rayner Foundation and 5 × 5×5 = Creativity. University Seminars, Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2008). Independent review of mathematics teaching in early years settings and primary schools. Final Report. London: DCSF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education (DfE). (2012). Statutory framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage. London: DfE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmiston, B. (2008). Forming ethical relationships in early childhood play. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsdóttir, J. (2010). Children’s experiences of the first years of primary school. European Early Childhood Educational Research Journal, 18, 163–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, D., & Alexander, K. (1998). Facilitating the transition to first grade: The nature of transition and the factors affecting it. Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 351–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfer, P., Goldschmeid, E., & Selleck, D. (2003). Key persons in the nursery: Building relationships for quality provision. Abingdon: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development: cultural-historical concepts in play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S. (2005). Teaching mathematics 3–5. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, H. and Seo K. (2000) Preschoolers’ math reading. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(4), 226–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goouch, K. (2010). Towards excellence in early years education. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, learning and children’s development: Everyday life in families and transition to school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, B., & Fricke, T. (2007). From sweet potatoes to god almighty. American Ethnologist, 34(3), 540–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, S. (1930). Intellectual growth in young children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, L. (2003). Moving into literacy: How it all begins. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzari A., Picchio, M., & Musatti, T. (2013). Sustaining ECEC quality through continuing professional development: Systematic approaches to practitioners’ professionalisation in the Italian context. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 33(1), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzo, L., & Brightbill, N. (2007). Towards a participatory ethics. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Connecting people, participation and place: Participatory action research approaches and methods (pp. 33–40). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Millan, M. (1904). Education through the imagination. London: Brown Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munn, P., & Schaffer, R. (1993). Literacy and numeracy events in social interactive contexts. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1(3), 81–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). (2010). Annual report 2009/10. London: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong 2. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2002). Early childhood numeracy. Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 9(1), 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S. (2010). Powerful pedagogies and playful resistance: Role play in early childhood education. In L. Brooker & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2010). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuard, H. (1986). Primary mathematics today and tomorrow. London: SCDC Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickell, C. (2011). The early years foundation for life, health and earning. London: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning: Talking and thinking at home and at school. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity, research, theory and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology, 42(1), 3–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2009). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www2.ohcr.org/english/law/crc.htm. Accessed 14 Sept 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (1996). Are you sure? Stimulating mathematical thinking during young children’s play. European Early Childhood Research Journal, 4, 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oers, B. (2005). The potentials of imagination. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 24(4), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitebread, D., & Bingham, S. (2011). School readiness: A critical review of perspectives and evidence. TACYT Occasional Paper No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (2003). How young children think and learn. Oxford: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, M. (2010). Play as a complex landscape: Imagination and symbolic meanings. In P. Broadhead, L. Wood, & J. Howard (Eds.), Play and learning in educational settings. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, M., & van Oers, B. (2015). Pretend play and the cultural foundations of mathematics. European Early Childhood Research Journal. (Accepted for publication).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been funded by the Martin Hughes Memorial Trust, Bristol University, England.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Carruthers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carruthers, E. (2015). Listening to Children’s Mathematics in School. In: Perry, B., MacDonald, A., Gervasoni, A. (eds) Mathematics and Transition to School. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-215-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics