Abstract
England’s Foundation Stage (birth to five) encourages children’s interests to be central in developing the curriculum. As children enter school, in the last year of this stage, political and organisational pressures take over forcing teachers to have uneasy pedagogies. From a postructural stance the ‘schoolification’ of the child begins and there is a great divide between the mathematics of the child and that of the school. The literature on transitions exposes curricula dissonance not only in England but across Europe, Australasia and North America. Dialogues from teachers highlight their confusion about how and when to teach calculation and especially mathematical notation. Mathematics becomes more teacher centred with strict objectives. The data from England’s National Assessments continue to show poor achievement in mathematical problem solving in the Foundation Stage. There needs to be a conceptual shift in the teaching of mathematics to young children in English schools to encompass children’s enquiries. This is from a Vygotskian perspective where there is priority given to social and cultural practices stressing the importance of co-participation. This could identify and enhance children’s mathematical problem solving. There is, however, much challenge for teachers not only in understanding children’s own mathematics that involves children’s agency but at the same time they need to confront the organisational walls of opposition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education (ACME). (2013). Response to the consultation on the draft programme of study for the National Curriculum. London: Author.
Anning, A. (2003). Pathways to the literacy club. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3(1), 5–35.
Aubrey, C. (1997). Mathematics teaching in the early years: An investigation of teacher’s subject knowledge. London: The Falmer Press.
Aubrey, C. (2004) Implementing the foundation stage in reception classes. British Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 27–41.
Bennet, N., Wood, E., & Rogers, S. (1998). Teaching through play. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Berk, L. E. (2003). Child development. Boston: Pearson.
Bomer, R., & Bomer, K. (2001). For a better world: Reading and writing for social action. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Brooker, L. (2002). Starting school. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Brooker, L. (2008). Supporting transitions in early years. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Carruthers, E. (2012). Are the children thinking mathematically? The pedagogy of children’s mathematical graphics. In M. McAteer (Ed.), Improving primary mathematics teaching and learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Carruthers, E. (2013, September). Teachers’ perspectives on children’s mathematics. Paper presented at the EECERA Conference, Tallinn, Estonia.
Carruthers, E., & Butcher, E. (2013). Mathematics: Young children co-construct their mathematical enquiries. In P. Beckley (Ed.), Early years foundation stage. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2005). Making sense of mathematical graphics: The development of understanding abstract symbolism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(1), 57–79.
Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2006). Children’s mathematics: Making marks, making meaning. London: Sage.
Carruthers, E., & Worthington, M. (2011). Understanding children’s mathematical graphics; beginnings in play. Maidenhead: Open University press
Coles, A. (2013). Tackling under achievement in mathematics through creativity in the primary school. Project funded by the Rayner Foundation and 5 × 5×5 = Creativity. University Seminars, Bristol.
Department of Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). (2008). Independent review of mathematics teaching in early years settings and primary schools. Final Report. London: DCSF.
Department for Education (DfE). (2012). Statutory framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage. London: DfE.
Edmiston, B. (2008). Forming ethical relationships in early childhood play. London: Routledge.
Einarsdóttir, J. (2010). Children’s experiences of the first years of primary school. European Early Childhood Educational Research Journal, 18, 163–180.
Entwistle, D., & Alexander, K. (1998). Facilitating the transition to first grade: The nature of transition and the factors affecting it. Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 351–64.
Elfer, P., Goldschmeid, E., & Selleck, D. (2003). Key persons in the nursery: Building relationships for quality provision. Abingdon: David Fulton.
Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development: cultural-historical concepts in play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gifford, S. (2005). Teaching mathematics 3–5. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Ginsburg, H. and Seo K. (2000) Preschoolers’ math reading. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7(4), 226–229.
Goouch, K. (2010). Towards excellence in early years education. Oxford: Routledge.
Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2013). Play, learning and children’s development: Everyday life in families and transition to school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoey, B., & Fricke, T. (2007). From sweet potatoes to god almighty. American Ethnologist, 34(3), 540–599.
Hughes, M. (1986). Children and number. Oxford: Blackwell.
Isaacs, S. (1930). Intellectual growth in young children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lancaster, L. (2003). Moving into literacy: How it all begins. In N. Hall, J. Larson, & J. Marsh (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood literacy. London: Sage.
Lazzari A., Picchio, M., & Musatti, T. (2013). Sustaining ECEC quality through continuing professional development: Systematic approaches to practitioners’ professionalisation in the Italian context. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 33(1), 21–32.
Manzo, L., & Brightbill, N. (2007). Towards a participatory ethics. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Connecting people, participation and place: Participatory action research approaches and methods (pp. 33–40). London: Routledge.
Mc Millan, M. (1904). Education through the imagination. London: Brown Press.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Munn, P., & Schaffer, R. (1993). Literacy and numeracy events in social interactive contexts. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1(3), 81–80.
Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted). (2010). Annual report 2009/10. London: Ofsted.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2006). Starting strong 2. Paris: OECD.
Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2002). Early childhood numeracy. Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 9(1), 62–73.
Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rogers, S. (2010). Powerful pedagogies and playful resistance: Role play in early childhood education. In L. Brooker & S. Edwards (Eds.), Engaging play. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sahlberg, P. (2010). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press
Shuard, H. (1986). Primary mathematics today and tomorrow. London: SCDC Publications.
Tickell, C. (2011). The early years foundation for life, health and earning. London: Department of Education.
Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning: Talking and thinking at home and at school. London: Fontana.
Trevarthen, C., & Aitken, K. J. (2001). Infant intersubjectivity, research, theory and clinical applications. Journal of Child Psychology, 42(1), 3–48.
UNICEF (2009). Convention on the rights of the child. New York: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www2.ohcr.org/english/law/crc.htm. Accessed 14 Sept 2013.
van Oers, B. (1996). Are you sure? Stimulating mathematical thinking during young children’s play. European Early Childhood Research Journal, 4, 71–87.
van Oers, B. (2005). The potentials of imagination. Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 24(4), 5–17.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Whitebread, D., & Bingham, S. (2011). School readiness: A critical review of perspectives and evidence. TACYT Occasional Paper No. 2.
Wood, D. (2003). How young children think and learn. Oxford: Open University Press.
Worthington, M. (2010). Play as a complex landscape: Imagination and symbolic meanings. In P. Broadhead, L. Wood, & J. Howard (Eds.), Play and learning in educational settings. London: Sage.
Worthington, M., & van Oers, B. (2015). Pretend play and the cultural foundations of mathematics. European Early Childhood Research Journal. (Accepted for publication).
Acknowledgements
This study has been funded by the Martin Hughes Memorial Trust, Bristol University, England.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carruthers, E. (2015). Listening to Children’s Mathematics in School. In: Perry, B., MacDonald, A., Gervasoni, A. (eds) Mathematics and Transition to School. Early Mathematics Learning and Development. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-215-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-215-9_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-214-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-215-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)