The Impact of ICT on Pedagogical Practices in an Interdisciplinary Approach

  • Kathryn ReedEmail author
Conference paper


Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) is a growing area of research that describes the knowledge base required by teachers to proficiently use educational technologies. However, few studies have focused on TPACK in an interdisciplinary approach. This paper reviews the literature related to interdisciplinary approaches in school contexts and outlines the differing views of TPACK. A conceptual framework using ICT-PCK based on Angeli and Valanides (2009) conceptualisation of ICT-TPCK as a distinct body of knowledge is proposed.


Interdisciplinary ICT Pedagogical practices TPACK 


  1. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice elementary teachers as information and communication technology designers: An instructional systems design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archambault, L. M., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616–622.Google Scholar
  6. Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Williston: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boix-Mansilla, V. (2010). MYP guide to interdisciplinary teaching and learning. Retrieved May 22, 2012, from
  8. Brown, S. W. (2008). Assessment is not a dirty word. In D. M. Moss, A. Osborn, & D. Kaufman (Eds.), Interdisciplinary education in the age of assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. CDC-HKEAA. (2014). Liberal studies curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6, pp. 1–232). Retrieved May 7, 2014, from
  10. Cox, S., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in practice: Using an elaborated model of the TPACK framework to analyze and depict teacher knowledge. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 53(5), 60–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and schools. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 1–15). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hammond, C., & McCallum, F. (2009). Interdisciplinary: Bridging the university and field of practice divide. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacobs, H. H. (1989). The growing need for interdisciplinary curriculum content. In H. H. Jacobs (Ed.), Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation (p. 97). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  15. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mishra, P., Koehler, M., & Kereluik, K. (2009). The song remains the same: Looking back to the future of educational technology. TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 53(5), 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moss, D. M., Osborn, T. A., & Kaufman, D. (Eds.). (2008). Interdisciplinary education in the age of assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Niess, M. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nissani, M. (1995). Fruits, salads, and smoothies: A working definition of interdisciplinary. The Journal of Educational Thought, 29(2), 121–128.Google Scholar
  21. Rennie, L. J., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2011). Learning science in an integrated classroom: Finding balance through theoretical triangulation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(2), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tchudi, S., & Lafer, S. (1996). The interdisciplinary teacher’s handbook: Integrated teaching across the curriculum. Portsmouth: Boynton/Cook Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Thompson, A., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK! Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38/64.Google Scholar
  26. Venville, G., Wallace, J., Rennie, L., & Malone, J. (2000). Bridging the boundaries of compartmentalised knowledge: Student learning in an integrated environment. Research in Science and Technological Education, 18(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013a). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., & ten Brummelhuis, A. (2013b). Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A Call to Action. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(1), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhbanova, K., Rule, A., Montgomery, S., & Nielsen, L. (2010). Defining the difference: Comparing integrated and traditional single-subject lessons. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(4), 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations