Skip to main content

Variable-Centered and Person-Centered Approaches to Studying the VARK Learning Style Inventory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover New Media, Knowledge Practices and Multiliteracies

Abstract

With the increased integration of technology in education process, teachers are challenged to personalize and create interactive learning environments to fulfill students’ needs. An understanding of how an individual’s preferred learning style interacts with the instructional medium presented is needed. This study examined the VARK (visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic) learning style inventory using the variable-centered and person-centered approaches. Based on a sample of 807 Secondary 1 (Grade 7) students in Hong Kong, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using the correlated trait–correlated uniqueness (CTCU) model affirmed that the model fits the responses from the inventory well. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified five meaningful subgroups of students (all rounded (6.2 %), mediocre (16.2 %), kinesthetic oriented (21.9 %), read/write oriented (50.4 %), and uninvolved (5.3 %)).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainley, M., & Buckley, S. (2010). Understanding educational achievement: Person, process and content. In S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Using analytical frameworks for classroom research: Collecting data and analysing narrative (pp. 1–18). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Hawthorn: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practitioners. Retrieved September 25, 2013, from http://itslifejimbutnotasweknowit.org.uk/files/LSRC_LearningStyles.pdf

  • Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1989). Learning styles inventory. Lawrence: Price Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C., & Cools, E. (2011). Applying styles research to educational practice. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(3), 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, N. D. (2001). Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Christchurch: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, N. D. (2011). The VARK questionnaire. Retrieved October 3, 2013, from http://www.vark-learn.com/english/page.asp?p=questionnaire

  • Grigerenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 205–230). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1976). The learning styles inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, W. W. F., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2009). Exploring the effects of gender and learning styles on computer programming performance: Implications for programming pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 696–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, W. W. F., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2010). Promoting conceptual change of learning sorting algorithm through the diagnosis of mental models: The effects of gender and learning styles. Computers & Education, 54(1), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, W. W. F., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2011). Modelling programming performance: Beyond the influence of learner characteristics. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1202–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite, W. L., Svinicki, M., & Shi, Y. (2010). Attempted validation of the scores of the VARK: Learning styles inventory with multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(2), 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning, I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. P. (1994). Learning style: A critical analysis of the concept and its assessment. In R. Hoey (Ed.), Design for learning: Aspects of educational technology (pp. 5–10). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analysis: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(6), 882–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs type indicator manual. Princeton: The Educational Testing Service.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G., & Scott, B. C. E. (1972). Learning strategies and individual competence. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 4, 217–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poncheri, R. M., & Ward, S. J. (2008). Personality remix: Integrating variable-centered and person-centered approaches to personality. Paper presented at the 23rd annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1997). Towards a categorisation of cognitive styles and learning styles. Educational Psychology, 17(1/2), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezler, A. G., & Rezmovic, V. (1981). The learning preference inventory. Journal of Applied Health, 10, 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. (1977). Verbaliser-visualiser: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1, 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. (1991). Cognitive styles analysis. Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles-an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3/4), 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. J., & Taylor, E. M. (1976). Imagery performance and prose comprehension in 7 year old children. Educational Studies, 2, 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation: Studies of development. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilfred W. F. Lau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lau, W.W.F., Yuen, A.H.K., Chan, A. (2015). Variable-Centered and Person-Centered Approaches to Studying the VARK Learning Style Inventory. In: Ma, W., Yuen, A., Park, J., Lau, W., Deng, L. (eds) New Media, Knowledge Practices and Multiliteracies. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-209-8_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics