An Exploratory Study on Interactive Whiteboard Usage on Enhancing Oral English in Secondary Classrooms

  • Guochen Zhang
  • Liping DengEmail author
Conference paper


This study aims to investigate two secondary school teachers’ use of Interactive Whiteboard (IWB) in the facilitation of students’ oral English and explore students’ perceptions of the role of IWB in learning English. Through analyzing the qualitative and quantitative data, this study has found out that in spite of the similar pedagogical goals, the two teachers differed in their use of IWB. Furthermore, teachers’ and students’ divergent perceptions regarding IWB usage in the teaching and learning of speaking were also discovered. The teachers held positive views of the effect of IWB, yet the majority of students deemed that IWB itself would not necessarily improve their English competency. Instead, what matters most was teachers’ pedagogical use of the technology.


Interactive whiteboard Perception Improvement Oral English 


  1. Al-Saleem, B. I. A. (2012). The interactive whiteboard in English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom. European Scientific Journal, 8(3), 126–134.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, A. V. (2009). Students’ and teachers’ perceptions of effective foreign language teaching: A comparison of ideals. The Modern Language Journal, 93(1), 46–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, Z., & Goh, C. (2011). Teaching oral English in higher education: Challenges to EFL teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(3), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Egbert, J., & Hanson-Smith, E. (1999). CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues. Alexandria: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.Google Scholar
  6. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Handley, Z. (2012). Investigating the use of interactive whiteboards during the pre-task phase of speaking tasks in the secondary English classroom. In Proceedings of the CALL: Using, learning, knowing, EUROCALL conference, Gothenburg, Sweden (pp. 111–116). Scholar
  11. Liddicoat, A. J., Papademetre, L., Scarino, A., & Kohler, M. (2003). Report on intercultural language learning. Australian Government. Department of Education Science and Training. Retrieved on May 6, 2013, from:
  12. López, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54(4), 901–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mathews-Aydinli, J., & Elaziz, F. (2010). Turkish students’ and teachers’ attitudes toward the use of interactive whiteboards in EFL classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKendrick, J. H., & Bowden, A. (1999). Something for everyone? An evaluation of the use of audio-visual resources in geographical learning in the UK. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23(1), 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nerlicki, K. (2011). Foreign language speaking anxiety from the perspective of Polish students of German studies. In M. Pawlak, E. Waniek-Klimczak, & J. Majer (Eds.), Speaking and instructed foreign language acquisition (pp. 183–199). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmid, E. C. (2006). Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the English language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmid, E. C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmid, E. C. (2010). Developing competencies for using the interactive whiteboard to implement communicative language teaching in the English as a foreign language classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Solano-Flores, G. (2008). English language learners. In C. Clauss-Ehlers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cross-cultural school psychology (pp. 427–428). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Thompson, J., & Flecknoe, M. (2003). Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in Key Stage 2. Management in Education, 17(3), 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wen, W. P., & Clement, R. (2003). A Chinese conceptualization of willingness to communicate in ESL. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 16(1), 18–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xu, H. L., & Moloney, R. (2011). Perceptions of interactive whiteboard pedagogy in the teaching of Chinese language. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 307–325.Google Scholar
  27. Yu, L. (2001). Communicative language teaching in China: Progress and resistance. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Huizhou UniversityHuizhouChina
  2. 2.Hong Kong Baptist UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations