Advertisement

Six Steps Toward Violent Fundamentalism

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter first reviews the current debate on so-called violent radicalization and extremism. It argues that it is theoretically richer and analytically more useful to situate the discussion of violent religious “extremism” or “radicalism” within the wider rubric of a religious fundamentalism energized by an embattled, constricted religiosity and animated by a highly tuned Manichean Mindset. The chapter suggests that a more nuanced understanding of cognitive radicalization and the related terms “cognitive radicalism” and “cognitive extremism” is warranted in order to better shed light on the key psychological mechanisms that help precipitate actual out-group violence. The chapter subsequently unpacks six mutually reinforcing intervening factors that need to be taken into account to explain how religious fundamentalism ultimately tips over into out-group violence: social humiliation, a tight counterculture, a protean charismatic group, intragroup psychic dynamics, an enabling environment of weak governance, and an enabling ideology. The key analytical construct of the charismatic group is also examined, in the process unpacking the third element of the Human Nature Triad, beyond binarity and religiosity: complexity, as well. It will be seen that the protean charismatic group – essentially what some social network and complexity theorists would call a superorganism – functions much like a complex, self-organizing, adaptive system seeking to preserve equilibrium with the ever-evolving environment. In essence, the chapter sheds explanatory light on the intervening processes that help ensure that the nascent violent potentials within religious fundamentalism are ultimately realized.

Keywords

Extremism Radicalism Religious fundamentalism Charismatic group Complexity Superorganism Social humiliation Intragroup psychic dynamics 

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2009). Terrorist financing in Southeast Asia. In D. Singh (Ed.), Terrorism in South and Southeast Asia: the coming decade (pp. 92–114). Singapore/New Delhi: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies/Macmillan India.Google Scholar
  2. Acharya, A. (2011, September 8). Cutting off the lifeblood of terrorism. The Malaysian Insider. http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/sideviews/article/cutting-off-the-lifeblood-of-terrorism-arabinda-acharya. Accessed 18 June 2014.
  3. Alcorta, C. S. (2010, April 29). Biology, culture, and religiously motivated suicide terrorism: An evolutionary perspective. Politics and Culture. http://www.politicsandculture.org/2010/04/29/biology-culture-and-religiously-motivated-suicide-terrorism-an-evolutionary-perspective/. Accessed: 17 June 2014.
  4. Alderdice, J. (2007). The individual, the group and the psychology of terrorism. International Review of Psychiatry, 19, 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ali, A. H. (2013). Raised on hatred. New Perspectives Quarterly, 30(2), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Almosawa, S. (2013, November 5). Another drone strike, another al Qaida propaganda Coup. iPolitics. http://www.ipolitics.ca/2013/11/05/another-drone-strike-another-al-qaida-propaganda-coup/. Accessed 18 June 2014.
  7. Alper, M. (2006). The “god” part of the brain: a scientific interpretation of human spirituality and god. Naperville: Sourcebooks.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, P. N. (2004). Religion and violence: From pawn to scapegoat. In J. H. Ellens (Ed.), The destructive power of religion: Violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Religion, psychology and violence, Vol. 2, pp. 265–283). London/Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Atran, S. (2010). Talking to the enemy: violent extremism, sacred values and what it means to be human. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  10. Bandura, A. (1998). Mechanisms of moral disengagement. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind (pp. 161–191). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bartlett, J., Birdwell, J., & King, M. (2010). The edge of violence: a radical approach to extremism. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  12. Bell, S. (2005). The Martyr’s oath: The apprenticeship of a homegrown terrorist. Mississauga: John Wiley and Sons Canada Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Bipartisan Policy Center. (2011). Preventing violent radicalization in America. Washington, DC: Bipartisan Policy Center.Google Scholar
  14. Blackmore, S. (2006). Memetics by another name? Review of P. J. Richerson & R. Boyd, Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Bioscience, 56, 74–75.Google Scholar
  15. Bloom, H. (2000). Global brain: the evolution of mass mind from the big bang to the 21st century. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Borum, R. (2011a). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Borum, R. (2011b). Radicalization into violent extremism II: A review of conceptual models and empirical research. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Buruma, I. (2007). Murder in Amsterdam: The death of Theo van Gogh and the limits of tolerance. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
  19. Carpenter, J. S., Levitt, M., Simon, S., & Zarate, J. (2010). Fighting the ideological battle: The missing link in US strategy to counter violent extremism. Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy.Google Scholar
  20. Channel News Asia. (2012). Alleged Bali mastermind regrets attack, begs for forgiveness. http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/1199693/1/.html. Accessed 8 June 2014.
  21. Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. (2011). Connected: the amazing power of social networks and how they shape our lives. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cilluffo, F., & Saathoff, G. (2007). Out of the shadows: Getting ahead of prisoner radicalization. Washington, DC/Charlottesville: The George Washington University Homeland Security Policy Institute and the University of Virginia Critical Incident Analysis Group.Google Scholar
  23. Collins, L. (2011, September 9). Former extremist warns against post-Bin Laden triumphalism. The National. http://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/books/former-extremist-warns-against-post-bin-laden-triumphalism. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  24. Conway, M. (2012). From al-Zarqawi to al-Awlaki: The emergence and development of an online radical milieu. Combating Terrorism Exchange, 2(4), 12–22.Google Scholar
  25. Cooper, T. D. (2007). Dimensions of evil: Contemporary perspectives. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cozzens, J. B. (2006). Identifying entry points of action in counter-radicalization: countering Salafi-Jihadi ideology through development initiatives – Strategic openings. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.Google Scholar
  27. Deikman, A. J. (2003). Them and us: Cult thinking and the terrorist threat. Berkeley: Bay Tree Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Dimaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Doidge, N. (2008). The Brain that changes itself: stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. Dunbar, R. (2010). How many friends does one person need? Dunbar’s number and other evolutionary quirks. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  31. Ellens, J. H. (2004). Fundamentalism, orthodoxy, and violence. In J. H. Ellens (Ed.), The destructive power of religion: Violence in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Contemporary views on spirituality and violence, Vol. 4, pp. 119–142). London/Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  32. Fink, L. (2014). Understanding radicalisation and dynamics of terrorist networks through political-psychology. Herzliya: International Institute for Counter-Terrorism.Google Scholar
  33. Finkel, D. N., Swartout, P., & Sosis, R. (2009). The socio-religious brain: A developmental model. Proceedings of the British Academy, 158, 287–312.Google Scholar
  34. Firestone, R. (1999). Jihad: The origins of holy war in Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hard to Forget (2012, March 31). The Straits Times.Google Scholar
  36. Fromm, E. (2001). The fear of freedom. London/New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  37. Galanter, M. (1999). Cults: faith, healing, and coercion (2nd ed.). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gaylin, W. (2003). Hatred: The psychological descent into violence. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  39. Gelfand, M., LaFree, G., Fahey, S., & Feinberg, E. (2013). Culture and extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 495–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gladwell, M. (2004). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  41. Grossman, D. (1996). On killing: The psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. New York: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
  42. Halverson, J. R. (2011, December 8). Why story is not narrative. Center for Strategic Communication, Arizona State University. http://csc.asu.edu/2011/12/08/why-story-is-not-narrative/. Accessed 26 June 2013.
  43. Hard to Forget (2012, March 31). The Straits Times.Google Scholar
  44. Harman, O. (2011). The price of altruism: George price and the search for the origins of human kindness. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  45. Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organisations. Human Relations, 51, 847–871.Google Scholar
  46. Hill, D. (2010). Fundamentalist faith states: Regulation theory as a framework for the psychology of religious fundamentalism. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 80–88). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoffman, B. (2011). Al-Qaeda and the continuing challenge of counterterrorism and homeland security. Home Team Journal., 3, 77–83.Google Scholar
  48. Homeland Security Policy Institute and the University of Virginia Critical Incident Analysis Group.Google Scholar
  49. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  50. International Peace Institute. (2010). A new approach? New York: Deradicalization Programs and Counterterrorism.Google Scholar
  51. Jackson, B. A. (2006). Groups, networks, or movements: a command-and-control-driven approach to classifying terrorist organizations and its application to Al Qaeda. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 29(3), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  53. Johnson, S. (2004). Mind wide open: why you are what you think. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  54. Jones, J. W. (2008). Blood that cries out from the earth: the psychology of religious terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jones, D. M., Lane, A., & Schulte, P. (2010). Terrorism, security and the power of informal networks. London: Edwar Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Juergensmeyer, M. (2000). Terror in the mind of god: The global rise of religious violence, updated edition with a new preface. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  57. Kay, A. C., & Eibach, R. P. (2013). Compensatory control and its implications for ideological extremism. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 564–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Khosrokhavar, F. (2010). The psychology of the global jihadists. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, & J. W. Jones (Eds.) with K. A. Boyd. The fundamentalist mindset: psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 139–155). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kilcullen, D. (2009). The accidental guerrilla: fighting small wars in the midst of a big one. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Klein, K. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2013). commitment and extremism: a goal systemic analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kressel, N. J. (2002). Mass hate: The global rise of genocide and terror, revised and updated edition. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  62. Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sensemaking in a complex and complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42(3), 462–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ledoux, J. (2003). Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2010). Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology. Poetics, 38(2), 204–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Maclean, W. (2011, September 5). Islamist videos, populists stir German worries. Reuters. http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/09/05/uk-germany-security-idUKTRE7842HS20110905. Accessed 18 June 2014.
  66. McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2011). Friction: How radicalization happens to them and us. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Miller, A. G. (2005). What can the milgram obedience experiments tell us about the holocaust? Generalizing from the social psychology laboratory. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 193–239). New York/London: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  68. Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Moghaddam, F. M. (2006). From the terrorists’ point of view: What they experience and why they come to destroy. Westport/London: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  70. Moussaoui, A. S., & Bouquillat, F. (2003). Zacarias Moussaoui: The making of a terrorist (trans: Pleasance, S., & Woods, F.). London: Serpent’s Tail.Google Scholar
  71. Nachmani, A. (2009). Europe and its Muslim minorities: Aspects of conflict, attempts at accord. Brighton/Portland: Sussex Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. Nasir, K. A., Pereira, A. A., & Turner, B. S. (2010). Muslims in Singapore: Piety, politics and policies. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. National Counterterrorism Center. (2012). Radicalization dynamics: A primer. Washington, DC: National Counterterrorism Center.Google Scholar
  74. Nawaz, M., & Bromley, T. (2012). Radical: My journey from Islamist extremism to a democratic awakening. London: W.H. Allen.Google Scholar
  75. Neumann, P. R. (2013). The trouble with radicalization. International Affairs, 89(4), 873–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Newberg, A., & Waldman, M. R. (2006). Why we believe what we believe: uncovering our biological need for meaning, spirituality and truth. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  77. Ozerdem, A., & Podder, S. (2011). Disarming youth combatants: mitigating youth radicalization and violent extremism. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pratt, D. (2010). Religion and terrorism: Christian fundamentalism and extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(3), 438–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ramakrishna, K. (2003). US strategy in Southeast Asia: Counter-terrorist or counter-terrorism? In K. Ramakrishna & S. S. Tan (Eds.), After Bali: The threat of terrorism in Southeast Asia (pp. 305–337). Singapore: World Scientific/Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ramakrishna, K. (2005). It’s the Story, stupid: Developing a counter-strategy for neutralizing radical Islamism in Southeast Asia. CSRC Discussion Paper 05/48. http://scholar.google.com.sg/scholar?cluster=16727912978685463890&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&sciodt=0,5. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  81. Ramakrishna, K. (2007). The (psychic) roots of religious violence in South and Southeast Asia. In L. E. Cady & S. W. Simon (Eds.), Religion and conflict in South and Southeast Asia: disrupting violence (pp. 122–134). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Ramakrishna, K. (2009). Radical pathways: Understanding Muslim radicalization in Indonesia. Westport/London: Praeger Security International.Google Scholar
  83. Ramakrishna, K. (2010, July 7). Self-radicalisation and the Awlaki connection. RSIS Commentary 75/2010. Google Scholar
  84. Ramo, J. C. (2009). The age of the unthinkable: why the new world disorder constantly surprises us and what we can do about it. New York: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  85. Razzaque, R. (2008). Human being to human bomb: inside the mind of a terrorist. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  86. Richardson, L. (2006). What terrorists want: understanding the terrorist threat. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  87. Ridley, M. (2004). The agile gene: How nature turns on nurture. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
  88. Samuel, T. K. (2011). The lure of youth into terrorism. SEARCCT’s Selection of Articles, 2, 107–119.Google Scholar
  89. Savage, S. (2011). Four lessons from the study of fundamentalism and the psychology of religion. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schmid, A. P. (Ed.). (2011). The Routledge handbook of terrorism research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  91. Schmid, A. P. (2013). Radicalisation, de-radicalisation, counter-radicalisation: a conceptual discussion and literature review. The Hague: International Center for Counterterrorism (ICCT) Research Paper.Google Scholar
  92. Schmid, A. P. (2014). Violent and non-violent extremism: Two sides of the same coin? The Hague: International Center for Counterterrorism (ICCT) Research Paper.Google Scholar
  93. Sen, A. (2006). Identity and violence: the illusion of destiny. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  94. Shermer, M. (2004). The science of good and evil: why people cheat, gossip, care, share, and follow the golden rule. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  95. Silber, M. D., & Bhatt, A. (2007). Radicalization in the west: the homegrown threat. New York: NYPD Intelligence Division.Google Scholar
  96. Sinai, J. (2012). Radicalization into extremism and terrorism: a conceptual model. The Intelligencer: Journal of US Intelligence Studies, 19(2), 21–25.Google Scholar
  97. Smith, P. B., Bond, M. H., & Kagitcibasi, C. (2006). Understanding social psychology across cultures: living and working in a changing world. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  98. Snowden, D. J. & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 1–8.Google Scholar
  99. Stahelski, A. (2004). Terrorists are made, not born: creating terrorists using social psychological conditioning. Journal of Homeland. http://icsahome.com/idx_topics.asp?Subject=Terrorists+Are+Made,+Not+Born:++Creating+Terrorists+Using+Social+Psychological+Conditioning. Accessed 25 June 2013.
  100. Standard Operating Procedure, produced and directed by Errol Morris, Sony Pictures Classics and Participant Productions, 2008.Google Scholar
  101. Stern, J. (2003). Terror in the name of god: Why religious militants kill. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  102. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Teehan, J. (2010). In the name of god: the evolutionary origins of religious ethics and violence. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act 2007. www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h110-1955&tab=summary. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  106. Thompson, R. L. (2011). Review of Clark McCauley and Sophia Moskalenko, friction: How radicalization happens to them and us. New York: Oxford University Press. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 195–196.Google Scholar
  107. Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justification: a dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology, 14(6), 1675–1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Vidino, L. (2010). Countering radicalization in America: Lessons from Europe. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, Special Report 262.Google Scholar
  109. Volkan, V. (2006). Killing in the name of identity: A study of bloody conflicts. Charlottesville: Pitchstone Publishing.Google Scholar
  110. Waldmann, P. (2008). The radical milieu: The under-investigated relationship between terrorists and their communities. Perspectives on Terrorism, 2(9). http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/51/html. Accessed 17 June 2014.
  111. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster. With a new afterword by the author.Google Scholar
  112. Waller, J. (2005). Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  113. White House. (2011). Empowering local partners to prevent violent extremism in the United States. Washington, DC: White House.Google Scholar
  114. Wiktorowicz, Q. (2005). Radical Islam rising: Muslim extremism in the west. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  115. Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  116. Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). A situationist perspective on the psychology of evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perpetrators. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 21–50). New York/London: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  118. Zimmerman, K. (2014, February 7). Al-Qaeda can’t be defined narrowly. The Straits Times.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.S. Rajaratnam School of International StudiesNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations