Skip to main content

The Embattled Religiosity of Religious Fundamentalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Islamist Terrorism and Militancy in Indonesia
  • 879 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses two questions. First, why does religion seem to be so ubiquitous and how feasible is it for humankind to totally secularize, as atheistic commentators are increasingly urging? Second, despite its undoubted capacity for promoting good, is religion nevertheless inherently if counterintuitively prone to violence? The chapter first explores the various reasons that have been offered for the persistence of religion across human societies. Employing evolutionist insights, the chapter shows that while at an individual level, religion is inevitable given the way human brains are constituted, at the group level, religion may well be considered as a complex adaptation that enhances the internal cohesion needed for success in competition and conflict with relevant out-groups. Moreover, while religiosity is a hardwired instinct, religion and religious fundamentalism are in fact cultural artifacts. In short, religion and more specifically religious fundamentalism represent channeled or canalized expressions of the innate religiosity of human beings. The chapter argues that religious fundamentalism represents the fusion of the highly tuned Manichean Mindset with a group religiosity marked by a sense of existential threat. While religious fundamentalism certainly does not ipso facto lead to intergroup violence, it unequivocally possesses violent potentials. Hence the chapter posits that it is not innate religiosity or the cultural product of religion per se that is the problem. Rather it is the defensive, embattled, constricted religiosity of religious fundamentalism that ultimately leads – in conjunction with other intervening factors to be explored – toward religious violence.

Even if religion did no other harm in itself, its wanton and carefully nurtured divisiveness – its deliberate and cultivated pandering to humanity’s natural tendency to favour in-groups and shun out-groups – would be enough to make it a significant force for evil in the world.

– Richard Dawkins

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akyol, M. (2011). Islam without extremes: A Muslim case for liberty. London/New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcorta, C. S. (2010, April 29). Biology, culture, and religiously motivated suicide terrorism: An evolutionary perspective. Politics and Culture. http://www.politicsandculture.org/2010/04/29/biology-culture-and-religiously-motivated-suicide-terrorism-an-evolutionary-perspective/. Accessed 17 June 2014.

  • Ali, A. H. (2013). Raised on hatred. New Perspectives Quarterly, 30(2), 37–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. (1966). The religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 5, 448–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., Appleby, R. S., & Sivan, E. (2003). Strong religion: The rise of fundamentalisms around the world. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, M. (2006). The “god” part of the brain: A scientific interpretation of human spirituality and god. Naperville: Sourcebooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. (2001). The battle for god: Fundamentalism in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bering, J. (2013). The god instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berreby, D. (2005). Us and them: Understanding your tribal mind. New York/Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. (2006). Memetics by another name? Review of P. J. Richerson & R. Boyd, Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. Bioscience, 56, 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. (1997). The Lucifer principle: A scientific expedition into the forces of history. New York: Atlantic Monthly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R. (2009). Virus of the mind: The new science of the meme. London/New York: Hay House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirot, D., & McCauley, C. (2010). Why not kill them all? The logic and prevention of mass political murder. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press. With a new preface by the authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. (2011). Connected: The amazing power of social networks and how they shape our lives. London: Harper Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, S. (2010, August 31). Religiosity highest in world’s poorest nations: United States is among rich countries that buck the trend. Gallup World. http://www.gallup.com/poll/142727/religiosity-highest-world-poorest-nations.aspx. Accessed 17 June 2014.

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deikman, A. J. (2003). Them and us: Cult thinking and the terrorist threat. Berkeley: Bay Tree Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowd, M. (2009). Thank god for evolution: How the marriage of science and religion will transform your life and our world. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2005). The evolution of evil. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 102–123). New York/London: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1994). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York/London: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esslemont, T. (2011, August 26). Spirituality in Estonia – the world’s ‘least religious’ country. BBC News. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14635021. Accessed 17 June 2014.

  • Finkel, D. N., Swartout, P., & Sosis, R. (2009). The socio-religious brain: A developmental model. Proceedings of the British Academy, 158, 287–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Policy: Special Issue100 Top Global Thinkers of 2009. (December 2009). Bill Clinton’s World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladigau, K., & West, B. (2007). Religious affiliation and moral conservatism in Australia and South Australia. Flinders Social Monitor. No. 8. http://smpf.flinders.edu.au/docs/No8%20Apr%2007.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2014.

  • Hamer, D. (2004). The god gene: How faith is hardwired into our genes. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, O. (2011). The price of altruism: George Price and the search for the origins of human kindness. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. (2005). The end of faith: Religion, terror and the future of reason. London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, C. (2008). When atheism becomes religion: America’s new fundamentalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herriott, P. (2007). Religious fundamentalism and social identity. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (2010). Fundamentalist faith states: Regulation theory as a framework for the psychology of religious fundamentalism. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 80–88). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • James, C. A. (2010). The religion virus: Why we believe in god – an evolutionist explains religion’s incredible hold on humanity. Hants, UK: O Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W. (2008). Blood that cries out from the earth: The psychology of religious terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W. (2010). Conclusion: A fundamentalist mindset? In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 216–220). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kosmin, B. A., & Keysar, A. (2009). American religious identification survey 2008 summary report. Hartford: Trinity College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, J. R., Bush, L. S., & Shackelford, T. (2011). An introduction to evolutionary psychology and its application to suicide terrorism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 3(3), 176–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, B. D. (2002). ‘Traditionalist’ Islamic activism: Deoband, tablighis, and talibs. Leiden: International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklethwait, J., & Wooldridge, A. (2010). God is back: How the global revival of faith is changing the world. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, K. A., Pereira, A. A., & Turner, B. S. (2010). Muslims in Singapore: Piety, politics and policies. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, A., & Waldman, M. R. (2006). Why we believe what we believe: Uncovering our biological need for meaning, spirituality and truth. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. (2010). Religion and terrorism: Christian fundamentalism and extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(3), 438–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purzycki, B. G., & Sosis, R. (2010). Religious concepts as necessary components of the adaptive religious system. In U. Frey (Ed.), The nature of god: Evolution and religion (pp. 37–59). Marburg: Tectum Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, D. C. (2001). The fourth wave: September 11 in the history of terrorism. Current History, 100, 419–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishna, K. (2009). Radical pathways: Understanding Muslim radicalization in Indonesia. Westport/London: Praeger Security International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzaque, R. (2008). Human being to human bomb: Inside the mind of a terrorist. Cambridge: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (2004). The agile gene: How nature turns on nurture. New York: Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, M. (2007). Fundamentalism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. (2011). Four lessons from the study of fundamentalism and the psychology of religion. Journal of Strategic Security, 4(4), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, M. (2003). How we believe: Science, skepticism and the search for god (2nd ed.). New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, M. (2004). The science of good and evil: Why people cheat, gossip, care, share, and follow the golden rule. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, M. (2011). The believing brain: From spiritual faiths to political convictions – How we construct beliefs and reinforce them as truths. London: Constable & Robinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, S. (2004). Fundamentalist world: The new dark age of dogma. Cambridge: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Values, Science and Technology. (2005) Special Eurobarometer. 225. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_225_report_en.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2014.

  • Sosis, R. (2009). The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 9, 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2003). Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosis, R., & Alcorta, C. (2008). Militants and Martyrs: Evolutionary perspectives on religion and terrorism. In R. D. Sagarin & T. Taylor (Eds.), Natural security: A Darwinian approach to a dangerous world (pp. 105–124). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, R. (2007). Discovering god: The origins of the great religions and the evolution of belief. New York: Harper One.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strozier, C. B. (2010). The apocalyptic other. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 62–70). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strozier, C. B., & Boyd, K. A. (2010). Definitions and dualisms. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 11–15). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strozier, C. B., & Terman, D. M. (2010). Introduction. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 3–7). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strozier, C. B., Boyd, K. A., & Jones, J. W. (2010). The charismatic leader and the totalism of conversion. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 38–43). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., & Horgan, J. (2001). The psychological and behavioural bases of Islamic fundamentalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(4), 37–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teehan, J. (2010). In the name of god: the evolutionary origins of religious ethics and violence. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Terman, D. M. (2010). Fundamentalism and the paranoid gestalt. In C. B. Strozier, D. M. Terman, J. W. Jones, & K. A. Boyd (Eds.), The fundamentalist mindset: Psychological perspectives on religion, violence and history (pp. 47–61). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster. With a New Afterword by the Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, J. (2005). Becoming evil: How ordinary people commit genocide and mass killing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. (2000). Arguments and icons: Divergent modes of religiosity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L. (2006). Six impossible things before breakfast: The evolutionary origins of belief. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2000). Nonzero: The logic of human destiny. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (2009). The evolution of god. New York: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ramakrishna, K. (2015). The Embattled Religiosity of Religious Fundamentalism. In: Islamist Terrorism and Militancy in Indonesia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-194-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics