Skip to main content

Disciplinary Intuitions in the English Language Classroom: Implications for Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disciplinary Intuitions and the Design of Learning Environments
  • 683 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter builds on the previous one, in that it proposes a dialogic pedagogy that seeks to provide a space for the teacher and the learner to interrogate intuitions. The question addressed is to what extent do our current methods of teaching allow the space for such a discourse? The epistemological practices of our education systems do not seem to give due regard to intuitions as a way of knowing. Students are taught to know mainly from authority, to a certain extent and depending on the subject, from their senses and in a most limited way from their personal experiences. Depending on one’s intuitions and worse still expressing them are risky ventures in a system that values homogeneity and conformity and where responses are constantly evaluated against authoritative ‘answers’. In a world of an overwhelming amount of information, it might be an opportune time to consider the place of intuition in the curriculum and with that, a dialogic pedagogy as a means to nurture it. If dialogic practices are prevalent enough in a child’s social milieu, it is likely the same child that will mature into a dialogic adult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, R. (2010). Dialogic teaching essentials. University of Cambridge. Available at: http://www.nie.edu.sg/files/oer/FINAL%20Dialogic%20Teaching%20Essentials.pdf

  • Aukerman, M. S., Belfatti, M. A., & Santori, D. M. (2008). Teaching and learning dialogically organized reading instruction. English Education, 40(4), 340–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.); C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, M. P., & Markarian, W. C. (2011). Dialogic teaching: Talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language & Education: An International Journal, 25(6), 515–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2010). Teaching, learning and talking: Mapping “the trail of fire”. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 9(2), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. (2010). Developing a hierarchical framework of critical reading proficiency. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(6), 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and Education, 22(3), 222–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 22(3), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I., & Freire, P. (1987). What is the “dialogical method” of teaching? Journal of Education, 169(3), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, D. (2006). Pedagogy and dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(4), 503–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaish, V. (2008). Interactional patterns in Singapore’s English classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 19(4), 366–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S., & Grant, R. (2009). Nurturing cultures of peace with dialogic approaches to language and literacy. TESOL in Context, 19(2), 4–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anselm Premkumar Paul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paul, A.P. (2015). Disciplinary Intuitions in the English Language Classroom: Implications for Practice. In: Lim, K. (eds) Disciplinary Intuitions and the Design of Learning Environments. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-182-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics