Advertisement

Developing a Deeper Understanding of Design in Technology Education

Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Issues in Technology Education book series (CITE)

Abstract

The fundamental position for this chapter is that design is central to being human—everyone designs and engages in the process of designing. However, design is different in different contexts. While designing is an innate capacity, it is also a disciplined activity system located in industry, commerce, the arts and education, and has multiple definitions and uses. Common across contexts is that all design should be creative (though not all creativity involves design). Design also involves riskiness and uncertainty, and is an integral aspect of a sustainable economy, ethical lifestyle and the shaping of communities. While such views of design represent empowering learning opportunities for children associated areas such as creativity, riskiness and uncertainty have become increasingly marginalised in educational contexts demanding ever-greater accountability in terms of productivity and performativity. An opportunity does, however, arise when considering future-focussed technology education programmes that value ‘design thinking’ and how this can contribute to students’ learning and ‘being’.

Keywords

Technology Education Design Activity Educational Context Sustainable Economy Design Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 10, 123–167.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. (1990). Within you, without you: The social psychology of creativity, and beyond. In M. Runco & R. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 61–91). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Colorado: West View.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, S. (2000). Does the need for high levels of performance curtail the development of creativity in Design and Technology project work? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(3), 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, S. (2002). Creativity versus the need for high levels of performance. In G. A. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Teaching Design and Technology in secondary schools (pp. 161–176). London: Routledge Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barlex, D. (2003). Creativity in crisis? Design and Technology at KS3 and KS4 (DATA research paper 18). Wellesbourne: DATA.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, F., & Ferguson, D. H. (1990). Innovation: Creativity techniques for hospitality managers. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  11. Carroll, R. T. (2003). The skeptic’s dictionary: A collection of strange beliefs, amusing deceptions, and dangerous delusions. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N. (2000). Chomsky on MisEducation (D. Macedo, Ed.). New York: Rowan and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Damasio, A. (2006). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  15. Davies, T. (1999). Taking risks as a feature of creativity in the teaching and learning of design and technology. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4(2), 101–108.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Flusser, V., & Cullars, J. (1995). On the word design: An etymological essay. Design Issues, 11 (3), 50–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  19. Heskett, J. (2001). Past, present, and future in design for industry. Design Issues, 17(1), 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  21. Keirl, S. (2004). Creativity, innovation and life in the lily pond: Nurturing the design and technology family while keeping the alligators fed. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 9(3), 145–157.Google Scholar
  22. Kimbell, R. (2000). Critical concepts underpinning the Design & Technology curriculum in England. Keynote address, international Technology Education conference, University of Brunswick, Germany.Google Scholar
  23. Kimbell, R. (2002). Assessing design innovation: The famous five and the terrible two. In E. W. L. Norman (Ed.), DATA international research conference 2002. Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.Google Scholar
  24. Kimbell, R., Wheeler, T., Stables, K., Shepard, T., Martin, F., Davies, D., Pollitt, A., & Whitehouse, G. (2009). e-Scape portfolio assessment: A research & development project for the Department of Children, Families and Schools. Phase 3 report. London: TERU, Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
  25. Liddament, T. (1996). Design and problem solving. In J. S. Smith (Ed.) International Design and Technology Educational and Research Conference (Idater 96), Loughborough University, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Love, T. (2002). Constructing a coherent body of theory about designing and designs: Some philosophical issues. Design Studies, 23(3), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mau, B. (2007). “What is massive change?” Massive change. Accessed 15 Jan 2012 from: http://www.massivechange.com/about/
  28. McCormick, R. (1994). Learning through apprenticeship. In D. Blandow & M. J. Dyrenfurth (Eds.), Technology education in school and industry (pp. 16–36). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCormick, R., & Davidson, M. (1996). Problem solving and the tyranny of product outcomes. Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1(3), 230–241.Google Scholar
  30. Pagram, J., & Williams, P. J. (2010). Digital assessment: A Western Australian experience in a senior secondary engineering course. In D. Spendlove & K. Stables (Eds.), Ideas worth sharing. The Design and Technology Association Education & International Research Conference, Keele University 2010 (pp. 85–92). Wellesbourne: Design and Technology Association.Google Scholar
  31. Papanek, V. J. (1971). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Chicago: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  32. Pigliucci, M. (2012). Answers for Aristotle: How science and philosophy can lead us to a more meaningful life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Roberts, P., Archer, B., & Baynes, K. (1992). Modelling: The language of designing (Design: Occasional paper no. 1). Loughborough: Loughborough University.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, P. (2013). Articulating design thinking. Design Studies, 34, 433–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharot, T. (2012). The optimism bias: A tour of the irrationally positive brain. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  36. Spendlove, D. (2005). Creativity in education: A review. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 10(2), 9–18.Google Scholar
  37. Spendlove, D. (2007a). We feel therefore we learn: The location of emotion in a creative and learning orientated experience. Keynote paper presented at the Design and Technology Educational and International Research conference, Wolverhampton.Google Scholar
  38. Spendlove, D. (2007b). A conceptualisation of emotion within Art and Design Education: A creative, learning and product orientated triadic schema. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 26(2), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spendlove, D. (2008). The locating of emotion within a creative, learning and product orientated Design and Technology experience: Person, process, product. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spendlove, D., & Hopper, M. (2005). Coping with uncertainty: an exploration of the place of emotion within the creative curriculum. Paper presented at the British Education Research Association annual conference, Glamorgan.Google Scholar
  41. Spendlove, D., & Hopper, M. (2006). Using ‘electronic portfolios’ to challenge current orthodoxies in the presentation of an Initial Teacher Training Design and Technology activity. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spendlove, D., & Rutland, M. (2007). Creativity in Design and Technology. In D. Barlex (Ed.), Design and Technology—for the next generation (pp. 140–153). Shropshire: Cliffeco.Google Scholar
  43. Spendlove, D., & Wells, A. (2013). Creativity for a new generation. In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Debates in design and technology education (pp. 166–179). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Spendlove, D., & Wyse, D. (2007). Creative learning: Definitions and barriers. In A. Craft, T. Cremin, & P. Burnard (Eds.), Creative learning 3–11 and how we document it: What how & why? (pp. 11–18). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  45. Stables, K., & Kimbell, R. (2000). The unpickled portfolio: Pioneering performance assessment in design and technology. In R. Kimbell (Ed.), Design and technology international millennium conference (pp. 195–202). Wellesbourne: DATA.Google Scholar
  46. Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welch, M., & Barlex, D. (2004). Portfolios in design and technology education: Investigating differing views. In E. W. L. Norman, D. Spendlove, P. Grover, & A. Mitchell (Eds.), DATA international research conference 2004 (pp. 193–197). Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
  48. Welch, M., Barlex, D., & Taylor, K. (2005). I don’t enjoy making the folder: Secondary students’ views of portfolios in technology education. In E. W. L. Norman, D. Spendlove, P. Grover, & A. Mitchell (Eds.), DATA international research conference 2005 (pp. 175–180). Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, C. R., & Arrigo, B. A. (2002). Law, psychology, and the ‘new sciences’: Rethinking mental illness and dangerousness. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46(1), 6–29.Google Scholar
  50. Zizek, S. (2001). What can Lenin tell us about freedom today? Rethinking Marxism, 13(2), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Singapore 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Institute of EducationThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations