Abstract
This chapter will examine how academe could effectively and efficiently serve industrial demands. This chapter further discusses the academe’s joint production of trained personnel advanced research which are rather complementary in their roles’ objectives to serve innovation system and respective economies. Linear Model, Contrasting Norms, Mode 2 and Triple Helix are to be discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although a national innovation system is difficult to precisely define, earlier works on the Japanese and US national innovation systems (Nelson 1993) have defined them as the network of public and private institutions within an economy that fund and perform R&D, translate the results of R&D into commercial innovations and affect the diffusion of new technologies. More concretely, a national innovation system includes the public agencies that support and/or perform R&D; universities that may perform research and play an important role in the training of scientists and engineers; the firms within an economy that invest in R&D and in the application of new technologies; any public programmes intended to support technology adoption; and the array of laws and regulations that define intellectual property rights.
References
Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention. In The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton: NBER.
David, P., Foray, D., & Steinmueller, W. (1999). The research network and the new economics of science: From metaphors to organizational behaviors. In The organization of economic innovation in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edqvist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. London: Pinter.
Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: Innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 28(2), 115–128.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leytesdorff, L. (1997). Universities in the global economy: A triple helix of academic-industry-government relation. London: Crom Helm.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leytesdorff, L. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 25(3), 195–203.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leytesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national system and “mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., & Healey, P. (1998). Introduction, entrepreneurial science: The second academic revolution. In H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, & P. Healey (Eds.), Capitalizing Knowledge. New York: State University of New York Press.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29, 273–278.
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157–182.
Henderson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Pisano, G. (1999). The pharmaceutical industry and the revolution in molecular biology: Interactions among scientific, institutional and organizational change. In Sources of industrial leadership. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. (1999). Does university-industry collaboration Adversely affect university research? Science and Technology Online. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/issues/15.4/realnumbers.htm
Huff, A. (2000). Changes in organizational knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 288–293.
Kline, S., & Rosenberg, N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–306). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Lundvall, B. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter.
Lundvall, B., & Johnson, B. (1992). National systems of innovation. London: Pinter.
Mongkhonvanit, J. (2009). Development of technological university model. Bangkok: National Council of Education.
Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2004). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. The Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297–306.
Nelson, R. (1982). Government and technical progress: A cross-industry analysis. New York: Pergamon.
Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative study. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. T. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mongkhonvanit, J. (2014). Academes’ Functions Within Innovation System. In: Coopetition for Regional Competitiveness. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-149-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-149-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-148-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-149-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)