Skip to main content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the criterion validity of selected cardiovascular field-based tests in estimating VO2max among healthy male adults. A sample of 20 male adults [(mean ± SD), age 21.4 years (±2.4), height 165.9 cm (±5.9), weight 66.6 kg (±6.6), and BMI 24.2 kg/m2 (±2.1)] was willing to participate in this study. Subjects were required to perform 20-m multistage shuttle run (MST) and Cooper’s 12-min run (12MR) as a test and treadmill-graded Bruce protocol as a criterion test in different weeks. VO2max level and last heart rates were recorded during the test. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0 with the significance level set at p ≤ 0.05. The agreement for both tests was analyzed using the Bland–Altman method. This study found that the difference between the mean (±SD) VO2max values of direct measurement (VO2max = 40.42 ± 4.49 ml/kg/min) and both direct measurement tests (MST = 37.52 ± 4.62 ml/kg/min; 12MR = 41.27 ± 4.2 ml/kg/min) was statistically significant. Both tests showed a strong relationship with the criterion test (MST, r = 0.83, p = 0.01, p < 0.05; 12MR, r = 0.95, p = 0.01, p < 0.05). However, the 12MR test showed a good limit of agreement (−3.59 and 1.88) with a small bias value (−0.86). In conclusion, both tests are valid and can be used to measure aerobic capacity, but the Cooper’s 12-min run test is more suitable in measuring VO2max among healthy male adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Castro-Piñero, J., Artero, E. G., España-Romero, V., Ortega, F. B., Sjöström, M., Suni, J. & Ruiz, J. R. (2010). Criterion-related validity of field-based fitness tests in youth: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44(13), 934–943.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clerk Maxwell, J. (1892). A treatise on electricity and magnetism (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 68–73). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Norasrudin, S., Anis, M., Rahmat, A., Rezian-na, K., & Mohd Norizham, S. (2012). Validity of selected aerobic capacity field-based test among rugby players. IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, 854–857.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, S. M., Baker, J. S., Tong, R. J., Roberts, E., & Hanford, M. (2005). The repeatability and criterion related validity of the 20-m multistage fitness test as a predictor of maximal oxygen uptake in active young men. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(4), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, K. K. (1968). A means of assessing maximal oxygen uptake. Journal of the American Medical Association, 203, 201–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet, 1, 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dewitte, K., Fierens, C., Stöckl, D., & Thienpont, L. M. (2002). Application of the Bland–Altman plot for the interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. Clinical Chemistry, 48, 799–801.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grant, S., Corbett, K., Amjadt, A. M., Wilson, J., & Aitchson, T. (1995). A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 29(3), 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Metaxas, T. I., Koutlianos, N. A., Kouidi, E. J., & Deliagiannis, A. P. (2005). Comparative study of field and laboratory tests for the evaluation of aerobic capacity in soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the Faculty of Sports Science and Recreation, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia, for support throughout the whole process of conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norasrudin Sulaiman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sulaiman, N., Idrus, I., Muhamad Nasir, M.Z., Adnan, R., Ismail, S.I., Osman, M.H. (2014). Criterion Validity of Selected Cardiovascular Field Based Test Among Healthy Male Adults. In: Adnan, R., Ismail, S., Sulaiman, N. (eds) Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Sports Science, Exercise, Engineering and Technology 2014 (ICoSSEET 2014). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-107-7_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-107-7_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-106-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-107-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics