Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper examines the auditor’s choice of audit procedure in response to client’s business risk assessment. Business risk ultimately translates into the risk of financial statement error. Therefore, an approach which focuses on understanding a business, its environment, and business processes provides the best means by which an auditor will recognize risks leading to business failure. To test the hypothesis that auditors change audit procedures in response to business risk, researchers will provide each subject with a statement of risk and a statement of risk with an additional environmental issues that will enhance business risk. Respondents will be provided with the audit procedures for each risk. The results will indicate whether auditor’s assessment of relevant audit procedures is affected by business risk. This study will contribute to the literature by examining the effect of business risk in audit planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bell, T., Marrs, F., Solomon, I., & Thomas, H. (2007). The 21st century of public company audit: Conceptual elements of KPMG global audit methodology. Montvale: KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paino, H., Smith, M., & Ismail, Z. (2010). Auditor acceptance to dysfunctional audit behaviour: An explanatory study in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 18(2), 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mock, T. J., & Wright, A. M. (1998). An explanatory study of auditor’s evidential planning judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mock, T. J., & Wright, A. M. (2008). Are audit program plans risk-adjusted? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 12(2), 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eilifien, A., Knechel, W. R., & Wallange, P. (2010). Application of the business risk audit model: A field study. Accounting Horizons, 15, 198–215.

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Donnell, E., & Schultz, J. J., Jr. (2005). The halo effect in business risk audits: Can strategic risk assessment bias auditor judgment about accounting details? The Accounting Review, 80(3), 921–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Mardyatul Miza Wan Tahir .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tahir, W.M.M.W., Paino, H., Rashid, S.A. (2014). Client’s Business Risk Assessment and Auditor’s Test. In: Kasim, A., Wan Omar, W., Abdul Razak, N., Wahidah Musa, N., Ab. Halim, R., Mohamed, S. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Science, Technology and Social Sciences (ICSTSS) 2012. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-077-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics